Introduction: Intraoperative frozen sections (IFS) play a vital role in guiding surgical procedures, especially in gynaecological oncology. The rapid diagnosis provided by frozen sections allows surgeons to make real time decisions during surgery, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. It is a demanding task for pathologists, requiring keen observation skills and the ability to make quick yet accurate assessments. The information gleaned from frozen sections helps surgeons determine the extent of the surgery needed and whether further interventions such as lymph node dissection, are necessary. This approach enables a more precise and tailored treatment plan for each patient, improving overall care and potentially reducing the need for additional surgeries. Objectives: To compare the results of intraoperative frozen section examination with the final histopathology report and assess its accuracy in diagnosing uterine tumors. Methods: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, a cross sectional study was carried out on 10 frozen section specimens of uterine origin. Later histopathological evaluation was done. Both frozen section diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis were compared to find out the accuracy of frozen section examination. Results: Fromthe10 cases studied on frozen section, 5 cases were diagnosed as Endometrial adenocarcinoma. Others included 1 of Low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, 1 of Smooth muscle tumour of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and 3 cases of Cellular leiomyoma. The diagnosis given on frozen section matched the final histopathological diagnosis in all the cases. Conclusion: We found that frozen section diagnosis in uterine tumors were accurate in all the cases we studied, because it matched the diagnosis given on subsequent histopathology. Hence frozen section can be a useful tool for intraoperative diagnosis of uterine tumors.