International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1387-1394
Original Article
TO EVALUATE THE ROLE OF FDG PET CT SCAN TO DIFFERENTIATE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND BIPOLAR AFFECTIVE DISORDER A COMPARATIVE STUDY FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE
 ,
 ,
Received
Nov. 10, 2025
Accepted
Dec. 4, 2025
Published
Dec. 15, 2025
Abstract

Introduction: Schizophrenia and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) often share overlapping symptoms, complicating early diagnosis. Functional neuroimaging, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT (FDG PET-CT), may help identify disorder-specific metabolic patterns. This study evaluated its utility in differentiating schizophrenia from BPAD.

Aims and Objectives: To compare cerebral glucose metabolism patterns on FDG PET-CT among patients with schizophrenia, BPAD, and healthy controls, and evaluate its role as an adjunct diagnostic tool.

Materials and Methods: In a one-year cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata, 72 patients with schizophrenia or BPAD were assessed. Sociodemographic data (age, sex, marital status, residence) were collected. FDG PET-CT analyzed metabolism in the prefrontal cortex, posterior frontal lobes, medial and lateral temporal lobes, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and other regions.

Results: Age (p = 0.0231) and marital status (p = 0.0196) differed significantly; sex (p = 0.4652), residence (p = 0.6429), mean age (33.28 ± 7.41 vs. 29.5 ± 9.58; p = 0.0655), and symptom scores (6.81 ± 3.76 vs. 6.83 ± 5.66; p = 0.9805) did not. FDG PET-CT showed predominantly normal metabolism. Mild hypometabolism occurred in the prefrontal cortex (30.6% left, 27.8–30.6% right; p = 0.5195–0.6468) and medial temporal lobes (47.2–55.6%; p = 0.5493–0.6844). Parietal, cingulate, occipital, cerebellum, and basal ganglia regions showed no significant differences (p = 0.1837–0.7358).

Conclusion: FDG PET-CT reveals subtle metabolic patterns that may aid in differentiating schizophrenia from BPAD. Although not diagnostic alone, it can serve as an adjunct to clinical assessment, improving accuracy in ambiguous cases.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia and Bipolar Affective Disorder (BPAD) are two of the most prevalent and debilitating psychiatric disorders worldwide, contributing significantly to disability, healthcare utilization, and socioeconomic burden [1]. Both conditions frequently present with overlapping symptoms—such as mood disturbances, psychosis, and cognitive dysfunction—which often complicates early diagnosis, particularly in resource-limited settings [2]. Misdiagnosis between schizophrenia and BPAD can lead to inappropriate treatment strategies, delayed initiation of effective therapy, and poorer long-term outcomes [3]. Therefore, identifying reliable biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy remains a critical focus within psychiatric research.

 

Over the past decade, advances in neuroimaging have provided valuable insights into the pathophysiological underpinnings of major psychiatric illnesses. Among these, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) has emerged as a promising modality for assessing cerebral glucose metabolism, a surrogate marker for neuronal activity [4]. FDG PET-CT can detect functional abnormalities even in the absence of structural changes, thus offering potential utility in differentiating between psychiatric disorders with similar clinical presentations [5].

 

Several studies have reported characteristic metabolic patterns in schizophrenia, typically demonstrating hypometabolism in the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and temporal lobes, regions associated with executive function, emotional regulation, and perceptual abnormalities [6]. Conversely, BPAD exhibits more variable metabolic changes depending on mood state. Manic episodes often show hypermetabolism in limbic and subcortical regions, whereas depressive phases may be associated with hypometabolism in prefrontal and parietal areas [7]. Despite this knowledge, most existing literature is derived from Western populations, and substantial heterogeneity persists regarding regional metabolic variations.

 

Data from India remain limited, particularly concerning direct comparisons of metabolic profiles in schizophrenia and BPAD using FDG PET-CT [8]. Furthermore, the clinical applicability of PET-CT findings in routine psychiatric practice has not been well established in low- and middle-income countries, where diagnostic challenges are compounded by symptom overlap, delayed healthcare seeking, and limited availability of specialized mental health services [9]. There is a growing need for region-specific research to evaluate the utility of FDG PET-CT as an adjunct diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of major psychiatric disorders.

 

In the context of a tertiary care setting—where patients often present with diagnostic complexity, refractory symptoms, or atypical clinical profiles—functional neuroimaging may add considerable value to clinical evaluation. Establishing consistent metabolic patterns in schizophrenia and BPAD could improve diagnostic accuracy, guide individualized treatment strategies, and potentially enhance long-term outcomes [10]. To compare cerebral glucose metabolism patterns on FDG PET-CT among patients with schizophrenia, patients with bipolar affective disorder, and healthy controls, and to assess its utility as an adjunct diagnostic tool.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Study design: It was a comparative cross-sectional observational study.

 

Place of study: Psychiatry OPD in a tertiary care general hospital (NRS medical college & hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal)

 

Period of study: 1 Year.

 

Study population: Patients attending Psychiatry OPD in a tertiary care general hospital (NRS medical college & hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal)

 

Study Variables: Age, Sex, Marital Status, Residence Type, Bipolar, Schizophrenia, Prefrontal Cortex Left, Prefrontal Cortex Right, Posterior Frontal Lobe Left, Posterior Frontal Lobe Right, Medial Temporal Lobe Left, Medial Temporal Lobe Right, Lateral Temporal Lobe Left, Lateral Temporal Lobe Right, Basal Ganglia Right, Basal Ganglia Left.

 

Sample size: 72 Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder were included in the study.

 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-60 years diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder according to DSM-5 criteria.
  • Patients willing to undergo FDG PET-CT scanning.
  • Patients providing informed consent.

 

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with major neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, epilepsy, brain tumors).
  • Patients with severe medical comorbidities affecting brain metabolism (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, thyroid disorders).
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients on medications that significantly alter cerebral glucose metabolism (e.g., high-dose corticosteroids).
  • Patients with claustrophobia or contraindications to PET-CT scanning.

 

Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using Student’s t-test or ANOVA, as appropriate. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages and analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Correlations between clinical parameters and regional cerebral glucose metabolism were assessed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

RESULT

 

Table 1: Socio-demographic Characteristics of Patients with Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

 

Bipolar

Schizophrenia

Total

p-value

Age Group

≤20

1 (2.8%)

5 (13.9%)

6 (8.3%)

0.0231

21–30

13 (36.1%)

18 (50.0%)

31 (43.1%)

31–40

16 (44.4%)

5 (13.9%)

21 (29.2%)

>40

6 (16.7%)

8 (22.2%)

14 (19.4%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Sex

Male

21 (58.3%)

24 (66.7%)

45 (62.5%)

0.4652

Female

15 (41.7%)

12 (33.3%)

27 (37.5%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Marital Status

Unmarried

21 (58.3%)

30 (83.3%)

51 (70.8%)

0.0196

Married

15 (41.7%)

6 (16.7%)

21 (29.2%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Residence Type

Urban

34 (94.4%)

33 (91.7%)

67 (93.1%)

0.6429

Rural

2 (5.6%)

3 (8.3%)

5 (6.9%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

 

Table 2: Distribution of Mean Duration of Illness by Diagnosis

Diagnosis

Number

Mean

SD

Minimum

Maximum

Median

p-value

Bipolar

36

6.8056

3.7631

2

21

7

0.9805

Schizophrenia

36

6.8333

5.6594

1

25

5

 

Table 3: PET Scan Findings of Prefrontal and Temporal Lobes in Patients with Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

 

Bipolar

Schizophrenia

Total

p-value

Prefrontal Cortex Left

Diffuse hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.5195

Diffuse hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypermetabolism

3 (8.3%)

1 (2.8%)

4 (5.6%)

Mild hypometabolism

11 (30.6%)

11 (30.6%)

22 (30.6%)

Mild to moderate hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

12 (33.3%)

8 (22.2%)

20 (27.8%)

Normal

10 (27.8%)

13 (36.1%)

23 (31.9%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Prefrontal Cortex Right

Diffuse hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.6468

Diffuse hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypermetabolism

2 (5.6%)

1 (2.8%)

3 (4.2%)

Mild hypometabolism

10 (27.8%)

11 (30.6%)

21 (29.2%)

Mild to moderate hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

12 (33.3%)

8 (22.2%)

20 (27.8%)

Normal

12 (33.3%)

13 (36.1%)

25 (34.7%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Posterior Frontal Lobe Left

Mild hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

0.3139

Normal

35 (97.2%)

36 (100.0%)

71 (98.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Posterior Frontal Lobe Right

Mild hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

0.3139

Normal

35 (97.2%)

36 (100.0%)

71 (98.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Medial Temporal Lobe Left

Diffuse hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.5493

Mild hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

Mild hypometabolism

20 (55.6%)

17 (47.2%)

37 (51.4%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

12 (33.3%)

9 (25.0%)

21 (29.2%)

Moderate hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

2 (5.6%)

2 (2.8%)

Moderate to severe hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

Normal

2 (5.6%)

5 (13.9%)

7 (9.7%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Medial Temporal Lobe Right

Diffuse hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.6844

Mild hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

Mild hypometabolism

20 (55.6%)

17 (47.2%)

37 (51.4%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

11 (30.6%)

9 (25.0%)

20 (27.8%)

Moderate hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

2 (5.6%)

2 (2.8%)

Moderate to severe hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

Normal

3 (8.3%)

5 (13.9%)

8 (11.1%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Lateral Temporal Lobe Left

Mild to moderate hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.3139

Normal

36 (100.0%)

35 (97.2%)

71 (98.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Lateral Temporal Lobe Right

Mild to moderate hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.3139

Normal

36 (100.0%)

35 (97.2%)

71 (98.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

 

Table 4: PET Scan Findings of Parietal, Cingulate, and Occipital Lobes in Patients with Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

 

Bipolar

Schizophrenia

Total

p-value

Parietal Lobe Left

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

0.7063

Diffuse hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypometabolism

3 (8.3%)

3 (8.3%)

6 (8.3%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

3 (8.3%)

4 (11.1%)

7 (9.7%)

Normal

29 (80.6%)

28 (77.8%)

57 (79.2%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Parietal Lobe Right

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

0.603

Diffuse hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypometabolism

3 (8.3%)

3 (8.3%)

6 (8.3%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

4 (11.1%)

6 (8.3%)

Normal

30 (83.3%)

28 (77.8%)

58 (80.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Cingulate Cortex Left

 

Diffuse hypermetabolism

2 (5.6%)

1 (2.8%)

3 (4.2%)

0.7212

 

Mild hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

2 (5.6%)

4 (5.6%)

Normal

32 (88.9%)

32 (88.9%)

64 (88.9%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Cingulate Cortex Right

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

0.7358

Mild hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

2 (5.6%)

4 (5.6%)

Normal

32 (88.9%)

32 (88.9%)

64 (88.9%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Occipital Lobe Left

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

0.5553

Mild hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

Mild hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild to moderate hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Normal

34 (94.4%)

33 (91.7%)

67 (93.1%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Occipital Lobe Right

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

0.5553

Mild hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

1 (2.8%)

2 (2.8%)

Mild hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild to moderate hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Normal

34(94.4%)

33 (91.7%)

67 (93.1%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

 

Table 5: PET Scan Findings of Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia in Patients with Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

 

Bipolar

Schizophrenia

Total

p-value

Cerebellum Left

Diffuse hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.4548

Hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypermetabolism

2 (5.6%)

2 (5.6%)

4 (5.6%)

Mild hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

5 (13.9%)

7 (9.7%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Moderate to severe hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

Normal

31 (86.1%)

26 (72.2%)

57 (79.2%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Cerebellum Right

Diffuse hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

0.1837

Hypermetabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Mild hypermetabolism

2 (5.6%)

1 (2.8%)

3 (4.2%)

Mild hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

8 (22.2%)

10 (13.9%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Moderate to severe hypometabolism

1 (2.8%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.4%)

Normal

31 (86.1%)

24 (66.7%)

55 (76.4%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Basal Ganglia Left

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

4 (11.1%)

5 (6.9%)

0.235

Mild hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

4 (11.1%)

5 (6.9%)

Mild hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

1 (2.8%)

3 (4.2%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Normal

32 (88.9%)

26 (72.2%)

58 (80.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

Basal Ganglia Right

 

 

Diffuse hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

4 (11.1%)

5 (6.9%)

0.235

 

 

Mild hypermetabolism

1 (2.8%)

4 (11.1%)

5 (6.9%)

Mild hypometabolism

2 (5.6%)

1 (2.8%)

3 (4.2%)

Mild to moderate hypometabolism

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.8%)

1 (1.4%)

Normal

32 (88.9%)

26 (72.2%)

58 (80.6%)

Total

36 (100.0%)

36 (100.0%)

72 (100.0%)

 

 

Figure 1: Distribution of Mean Duration of Illness by Diagnosis

 

 

Figure 2: Socio-demographic Characteristics of Patients with Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

 

Among the 72 patients, the age distribution differed significantly between bipolar and schizophrenia groups (p = 0.0231), with most bipolar patients aged 31–40 (44.4%) and most schizophrenia patients aged 21–30 (50.0%). There was no significant sex difference (p = 0.4652). Marital status showed a significant difference (p = 0.0196), with more schizophrenia patients being unmarried (83.3%) compared to bipolar patients (58.3%). Most participants resided in urban areas, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.6429).

 

The mean age of bipolar patients was 33.28 ± 7.41 years (range 17–45, median 34.5) compared to 29.5 ± 9.58 years (range 16–45, median 27) in schizophrenia patients, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.0655). Symptom scores were similar between groups, with bipolar patients having a mean score of 6.81 ± 3.76 (range 2–21, median 7) and schizophrenia patients 6.83 ± 5.66 (range 1–25, median 5; p = 0.9805).

 

PET scan findings showed no statistically significant differences between bipolar and schizophrenia patients in any brain region examined. In the prefrontal cortex, mild hypometabolism was observed in 30.6% of patients in both groups on the left side and in 27.8–30.6% on the right, while most remaining scans were normal (p = 0.5195 for left, 0.6468 for right). Posterior frontal lobes were largely normal in both groups (97.2–100%, p = 0.3139). In the medial temporal lobes, mild hypometabolism predominated (47.2–55.6%), with a few cases showing moderate or moderate-to-severe hypometabolism; differences were not significant (p = 0.5493 left, 0.6844 right). Lateral temporal lobes were almost entirely normal, with only one case of mild-to-moderate hypermetabolism in schizophrenia on each side (p = 0.3139).

PET scan analysis of the parietal, cingulate, and occipital lobes revealed predominantly normal findings in both bipolar and schizophrenia patients, with no statistically significant differences observed. In the parietal lobes, 77.8–83.3% of scans were normal, with mild to moderate hypometabolism seen in a minority of patients (p = 0.603–0.7063). The cingulate cortex showed mostly normal metabolism (88.9%), with occasional diffuse hypermetabolism or mild-to-moderate hypometabolism in a few cases (p = 0.7212–0.7358). Occipital lobes were also largely normal (91.7–94.4%), with rare instances of hyper- or hypometabolism (p = 0.5553).

 

PET scan analysis of the cerebellum and basal ganglia showed mostly normal findings in both groups, with no statistically significant differences. In the cerebellum, 72.2–86.1% of scans were normal, with mild hypometabolism observed more frequently in schizophrenia patients (13.9–22.2%) than in bipolar patients (5.6%; p = 0.1837–0.4548). The basal ganglia were largely normal (72.2–88.9%), with a few cases of diffuse or mild hypermetabolism more common in schizophrenia (11.1%) compared to bipolar patients (2.8%; p = 0.235). Overall, metabolic abnormalities were infrequent and mild across these regions.

 

DISCUSSION

In this study of 72 patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, we observed largely preserved cortical glucose metabolism, with only mild and infrequent regional abnormalities. Mild hypometabolism in the prefrontal cortex was seen in 28–31% of patients, while most scans were normal. Posterior frontal lobes were predominantly normal (97–100%), and mild hypometabolism was most common in the medial temporal lobes (47–56%), with occasional moderate or moderate-to-severe hypometabolism. Lateral temporal lobes were largely normal, with only isolated cases of mild-to-moderate hypermetabolism in schizophrenia [11,12]. Analysis of parietal, cingulate, and occipital lobes revealed mostly normal metabolism, with mild-to-moderate hypometabolism observed in a minority of patients. Cerebellar and basal ganglia scans were also predominantly normal, although mild hypometabolism occurred more frequently in schizophrenia, and rare diffuse or mild hypermetabolism was noted. Overall, metabolic abnormalities were mild and infrequent across all regions [13,14]. These findings are consistent with prior studies reporting subtle cortical metabolic changes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, often limited to the prefrontal or temporal regions, while the majority of scans remain normal [15,16]. Although classical reviews suggest frontal hypometabolism is more prominent in schizophrenia and temporal-cerebellar changes in bipolar disorder, our cohort exhibited largely overlapping profiles, suggesting that cortical metabolism differences may be less pronounced in carefully managed or early-phase illness [17]. Differences reported in previous studies may reflect chronicity, medication exposure, or sample heterogeneity, highlighting the need for careful cohort characterization [18]. Subcortical and cerebellar metabolism showed trends consistent with prior observations: schizophrenia patients more frequently exhibited mild basal ganglia and cerebellar hypometabolism, whereas bipolar patients largely had normal findings [19]. This supports the concept that subcortical dysfunction may differentiate the two disorders more than cortical metabolism at rest. Furthermore, structural neuroimaging has demonstrated overlapping grey matter volume reductions in prefrontal and temporal cortices in both disorders, with more pronounced subcortical and cerebellar changes in schizophrenia [20].

 

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that while schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder exhibit some overlapping clinical features, their cerebral glucose metabolism patterns on FDG PET-CT are largely similar, with mild regional metabolic abnormalities observed in both groups. Age and marital status differed between the groups, but sex and residence showed no significant variation. Overall, metabolic changes were infrequent and predominantly mild, suggesting that FDG PET-CT may have limited standalone diagnostic utility; however, it can serve as a supportive adjunct to clinical evaluation, particularly in complex or ambiguous cases. These findings underscore the need for further larger-scale, multicentric studies to validate region-specific metabolic biomarkers and refine their role in differential diagnosis.

 

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. The global burden of mental disorders. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
  2. Kessler RC, Bromet EJ. The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:119–138.
  3. Craddock N, Owen MJ. The Kraepelinian dichotomy – going, going…but still not gone. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(2):92–95.
  4. Chawla JM, et al. FDG PET imaging in psychiatric disorders: current status and future directions. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:673891.
  5. Volkow ND, et al. Brain glucose metabolism in psychiatric and neurological disorders. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(8):1233–1240.
  6. Tamminga CA, et al. Functional imaging in schizophrenia: implications for pathophysiology. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014;231:147–164.
  7. Blumberg HP, et al. Neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder: evidence for abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(7):1238–1248.
  8. Chatterjee S, et al. Neuroimaging in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in India: a systematic review. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020;62(5):519–528.
  9. Grover S, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of severe mental disorders in low-resource settings. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;30:41–46.
  10. Saxena S, et al. FDG PET-CT in differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: potential clinical applications. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2019;292:49–58.
  11. Townsend L, Pillinger T, Selvaggi P, Veronese M, Turkheimer F, Howes O. Brain glucose metabolism in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET studies in schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2022;53(11):4880–4897.
  12. Voxel-based meta-analysis of cerebral glucose metabolism in bipolar disorder. Brain Behav. 2021;16:738–747.
  13. White matter metabolism differentiates schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a preliminary PET study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2013;214(1):31–37.
  14. Brain structural abnormalities at the onset of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of controlled MRI studies. Schizophr Res. 2011;125(1–3):194–205.
  15. Brain structure in schizophrenia vs. psychotic bipolar I disorder: a VBM study. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:174–183.
  16. Morphometry and gyrification in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a comparative MRI study. Schizophr Res. 2020;218:118–125.
  17. No change to grey and white matter volumes in bipolar I disorder patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258:345–349.
  18. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(3):177–186.
  19. Brain morphological characteristics of cognitive subgroups of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022;33:192–220.
  20. Comparative multimodal meta-analysis of anisotropy and volume abnormalities in white matter in people suffering from bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2022;48(1):69–80.
Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
Assessment of lumbar lordosis and pelvic parameters in chronic low back pain patients
2023, Volume-4, Issue-1 : 199-205
Original Article Open Access
Anatomical Variations of High Division of Sciatic Nerve and its Relation to Piriformis – A Cadaveric Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1595-1600
Original Article Open Access
Anatomical Variations of the Branching Pattern of Renal Vessels: A Cadaveric Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1606-1611
Original Article Open Access
IMPACT OF NEBULIZED KETAMINE ON INTRAOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1612-1618
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue 6
Citations
29 Views
28 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved