International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 737-738
Research Article
To Compare the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as An Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Prospective Comparative Study
 ,
 ,
Received
Aug. 16, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 5, 2025
Published
Sept. 25, 2025
Abstract

Background: α2-adrenergic agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine have been used as intrathecal adjuvants to bupivacaine to enhance block quality and prolong postoperative analgesia.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgeries.

Methods: Sixty ASA I–II patients aged 18–65 years undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries were randomized into two groups (n=30 each). Group C received clonidine 30 mcg with 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine; Group D received dexmedetomidine 3 mcg with 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. Block characteristics, duration of analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and complications were assessed.

Results: Demographics were comparable between groups. Mean sensory block onset was 6.43 ± 2.87 min (clonidine) vs 6.04 ± 2.93 min (dexmedetomidine, p=0.600). Motor block onset was 7.6 ± 2.85 min vs 7.02 ± 2.84 min (p=0.431). Analgesia duration was 333.3 ± 94.0 min vs 367.7 ± 89.0 min (p=0.152). Hemodynamic changes and side effects (hypotension, bradycardia) were minimal and not significantly different.

Conclusion: Both clonidine 30 mcg and dexmedetomidine 3 mcg as intrathecal adjuvants provide effective block characteristics and stable hemodynamics. Dexmedetomidine showed a non-significant trend toward earlier onset and prolonged analgesia, while clonidine remains more cost-effective.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine provides reliable intraoperative anaesthesia but is limited by shorter postoperative analgesia. Intrathecal adjuvants have been evaluated to improve block duration and patient comfort. α2-adrenergic agonists, particularly clonidine and dexmedetomidine, have shown promise due to their sedative, analgesic, and opioid-sparing effects without significant respiratory depression.


This study aimed to compare intrathecal clonidine (30 mcg) and dexmedetomidine (3 mcg) as adjuvants to bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative study.
Population: 60 patients, ASA I–II, aged 18–65 years, scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgery.
Groups:
- Group C (n=30): Bupivacaine 12.5 mg + Clonidine 30 mcg
- Group D (n=30): Bupivacaine 12.5 mg + Dexmedetomidine 3 mcg

Assessments:
- Onset of sensory block (T10 level)
- Onset of motor block (Modified Bromage 3)
- Duration of analgesia (time to first rescue analgesic, tramadol 50 mg IV)
- Hemodynamic parameters (HR, MAP at intervals for 12h)
- Complications (hypotension, bradycardia, sedation)

Statistics: SPSS v20 used. Independent t-test, chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. p < 0.05 considered significant.

 

RESULTS

- Sensory block onset: 6.43 ± 2.87 min (clonidine) vs 6.04 ± 2.93 min (dexmedetomidine), p=0.600
- Motor block onset: 7.6 ± 2.85 min vs 7.02 ± 2.84 min, p=0.431
- Analgesia duration: 333.3 ± 94.0 min vs 367.7 ± 89.0 min, p=0.152
- Hemodynamics: HR and MAP trends comparable; occasional bradycardia/hypotension treated effectively.
- Complications: None had excessive sedation; adverse events minimal and comparable.

 

DISCUSSION

Both adjuvants provided comparable efficacy with stable hemodynamics. Dexmedetomidine showed a trend toward longer analgesia, consistent with prior studies. Clonidine, however, remains a cost-effective option, especially in resource-limited settings. Importantly, both agents were free of major complications at low doses, supporting their role as opioid-sparing alternatives.

 

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine (3 mcg) and clonidine (30 mcg) are safe and effective intrathecal adjuvants to bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgeries. Dexmedetomidine may offer marginal clinical benefit, while clonidine remains more economical. Further multicentre trials with larger sample sizes are warranted.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Sur D, Agarwal A, Chaudhary A, Bogra J, Singh P, Gupta R et al. A comparative study of different adjuncts to enhance the effects of intrathecal bupivacaine. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(5):2046-52.
  2. Verma D, Naithani U, Jain D, Singh A. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of intrathecal tramadol versus nalbuphine added to bupivacaine. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(33):6196-6206.
  3. Asano T, Dohi S, Ohta S, Shimonaka H, Iida H. Antinociception by α2-agonists in rat spinal cord. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(2):400-407.
  4. Akhter M, Mir AW, Ahmad B, Ahmad F, Sidiq S, Shah AM et al. Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia in urological procedures. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4(1):154-158.
  5. Jamliya RH, Vansola R, Shah B, Chauhan DL. Effect of clonidine with bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in lower limb surgery. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2012;3(1).
  6. Sethi BS, Samuel M, Sreevastava D. Low-dose intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant. Indian J Anaesth. 2007;51(5):415-9.
  7. Kaabachi O, Zarghouni A, Ouezini R, et al. Clonidine 1 mcg/kg as an adjuvant in adolescents. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(2):516-9.
  8. Elia N, Culebras X, Mazza C, Schiffer E, Tramèr MR. Clonidine as intrathecal adjuvant: systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(2):159-67.
  9. Niemi L. Intrathecal clonidine with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:724–8.
  10. Patro SS, Deshmukh H, Ramani YR, Das G. Dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine in infraumbilical surgeries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(3):13-16.
  11. Halder S, Das A, Mandal D, et al. Different doses of dexmedetomidine in spinal anaesthesia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(11):GC01.
  12. Al-Mustafa MM, Abu-Halaweh SA, Aloweidi AS, et al. Dexmedetomidine added to spinal bupivacaine in urology. Saudi Med J. 2009;30(3):365-70.
  13. Gupta R, Bogra J, Verma R, et al. Dexmedetomidine as intrathecal adjuvant. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:347-51.
  14. Kim JE, Kim NY, Lee HS. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine in elderly TURP patients. Biol Pharm Bull. 2013;36(6):959-65.
  15. Kanazi GE, Aouad MT, Jabbour-Khoury SI, et al. Low-dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:222-7.
  16. Singh R, Shukla A. Intrathecal clonidine vs dexmedetomidine. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci. 2012;2:24-33.
  17. Anandani DN, Shelat SD, Vaniya J, Patel P. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine vs clonidine in gynecological surgery. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015;4:1163-7.
  18. Suthar O, Sethi P, Sharma UD. Dexmedetomidine vs clonidine as adjuvants. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care. 2015;18(2):149-54.
  19. Chandra G, Krishna S, Singh P. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine vs clonidine in lower limb fractures. Int Surg J. 2017;4(12):3833.
  20. Ganesh M, Krishnamurthy D. Dexmedetomidine vs clonidine in abdominal surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2018;12(2):539–545.

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Functional Outcomes of Early vs. Delayed Weight Bearing After Tibial Intramedullary Nailing
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 739-744
Research Article Open Access
Posterior Capsular Opacification in High Myopic Eyes Post Cataract Surgery: A Single Centre Experience from Western India
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 720-727
Research Article Open Access
Current Consensus of Surgical Management for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Review of Articles
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 728-736
Research Article Open Access
A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON HISTOPATHOLOGICAL SPECTRUM AND CLINICAL PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT OVARIAN TUMOUR AT MEDICAL COLLEGE KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 568-575
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17178694
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue-5
Citations
2 Views
2 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright IJMPR | All Rights Reserved