International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3372-3374
Research Article
Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
 ,
 ,
Received
March 17, 2026
Accepted
April 6, 2026
Published
April 23, 2026
Abstract

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy face increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications under general anaesthesia (GA). Thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia (TSSA) has emerged as an effective alternative in such patients. This prospective observational study included thirty-five patients with moderate to severe COPD scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TSSA was successfully administered in thirty-four cases (97.1%), while one patient required conversion to GA due to prolonged surgery. Haemodynamic stability was maintained throughout, and no major respiratory events occurred. Shoulder tip pain was the most frequent postoperative complaint, mild in nature and managed with analgesics. TSSA proved to be a safe, feasible, and well-tolerated anaesthetic option for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in COPD patients, providing stable haemodynamics and minimal postoperative respiratory compromise.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases perioperative morbidity, especially in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia (GA). Airway instrumentation and positive pressure ventilation can impair pulmonary function, leading to complications such as atelectasis, bronchospasm, and respiratory failure, particularly in moderate to severe COPD.

 

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is typically performed under GA; however, pneumoperitoneum further reduces lung compliance and can worsen respiratory function in these patients. Thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia (TSSA) has emerged as an alternative, avoiding airway manipulation while preserving spontaneous respiration, ensuring stable haemodynamics, and promoting early recovery.

 

Despite its feasibility, evidence on the use of low-dose local anaesthetics, particularly 0.5% ropivacaine, remains limited. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of TSSA using low-dose ropivacaine in patients with moderate to severe COPD undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

 

Aims

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anaesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in COPD Patients.

 

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology, GMC and Associated Hospitals, Srinagar, after institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent. Thirty-five adult patients aged 45–70 years, classified as ASA III with moderate to severe COPD, were included.

 

Inclusion criteria:

  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Diagnosed moderate to severe COPD
  • ASA physical status III

 

Exclusion criteria:

  • Severe cardiac disease
  • Coagulopathy or spinal deformity
  • Local infection at puncture site
  • Allergy to local anaesthetics
  • Patient refusal


All patients were preloaded with 10 ml/kg Ringer’s lactate and premedicated with intravenous midazolam (1 mg) and glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg). Under aseptic precautions, TSSA was performed at the T8–T9 interspace using a 26-gauge Quincke needle. After confirming free cerebrospinal fluid flow, 1.5–2.0 ml of 0.5 % ropivacaine (Isobaric) with 25 µg fentanyl was administered.


The target sensory level was T4–T10. Standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, SpO₂, EtCO₂) was applied. Oxygen (2 L/min via nasal prongs) was given. Haemodynamics were recorded at baseline, then every 5 min intra-operatively. Hypotension (> 20 % fall in MAP) was managed with fluids and ephedrine; bradycardia (< 50 bpm) with atropine. Post-operative parameters included pain, nausea, vomiting, shoulder discomfort, and respiratory complications.

 

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were studied. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed under TSSA in thirty-four patients (97.1 %). One patient required conversion to GA due to prolonged surgery.

 

Intra-operative haemodynamics remained stable. Four patients (11.4 %) developed mild hypotension and two (5.7 %) had bradycardia; all responded to standard treatment. Shoulder-tip pain was seen in five patients (14.2 %) and was the most common postoperative complaint. No episodes of desaturation, respiratory distress, or neurological sequelae were reported.

 

Parameter

Observation

Total patients

35

Completed under TSSA

34 (97.1 %)

Converted to GA

1 (2.9 %)

Hypotension

4 (11.4 %) – managed with fluids/ ephedrine

Bradycardia

2 (5.7 %) – treated with atropine

Shoulder-tip pain

5 (14.2 %) – mild, most common post-operative complaint managed with Fentanyl 25 mcg incremental dose

Desaturation

None

Post-operative pulmonary complications

None

 

All patients maintained SpO₂ > 96 % throughout. Early ambulation within 4 hours and oral intake within 6 hours were achieved by most patients. No post-operative pulmonary or neurological complications were noted. These findings mirror those reported by Imbelloni et al. [1] and Van Zundert et al. [2].

 

DISCUSSION

Thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia has gained increasing acceptance as a feasible alternative to general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, particularly in high-risk COPD patients. By avoiding tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, TSSA helps preserve pulmonary mechanics and prevents post-operative respiratory compromise [3, 6].


In this study, 97 % of surgeries were completed successfully under TSSA alone, comparable to previous work [1, 2, 5]. Minor haemodynamic changes were easily managed, consistent with Gurudatta et al. [5]. Shoulder-tip pain, resulting from diaphragmatic irritation due to pneumoperitoneum, was mild and controlled with intravenous analgesics [4].

 

No desaturation or respiratory distress was recorded, supporting Bevan’s conclusion [3] that regional anaesthesia preserves respiratory function in COPD. Kahveci et al. [7] and Al-Dohayan et al. [9] similarly documented excellent patient comfort and safety using low-dose thoracic spinal blocks.

 

TSSA allows targeted segmental blockade with minimal cephalad spread, maintaining diaphragmatic motion and early recovery [8]. Given these benefits, TSSA is a rational and safe choice for patients in whom GA poses increased pulmonary risk [9, 10].

 

CONCLUSION

Our study is distinct because it evaluates thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in COPD patients using 0.5% ropivacaine, whereas the commonly used standard concentration in previous studies has been 0.75% ropivacaine. By using a lower concentration, our study aims to determine whether effective anaesthesia, stable haemodynamics, preservation of respiratory function, and faster recovery can still be achieved with potentially fewer drug-related effects. This difference makes our study important in exploring a safer and equally effective alternative for appropriately selected high-risk patients.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Imbelloni LE, et al. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparative study with general anaesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2014; 8(3): 314–320.
  2. Van Zundert AAJ, et al. Segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia: A safer alternative for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 100(5): 655–662.
  3. Bevan DR. Anaesthesia for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can J Anaesth. 1999; 46(6): 597–610.
  4. Joris JL, et al. Haemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 90(4): 446–450.
  5. Gurudatta CL, et al. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia: A prospective study in upper abdominal surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(5): 456–461.
  6. Casati A, et al. Regional anaesthesia in high-risk surgical patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003; 16(5): 507–512.
  7. Kahveci K, et al. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised controlled trial. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014; 41(6): 457–462.
  8. Fettes PD, et al. Mechanisms of spread of spinal anaesthesia and its clinical implications. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64(1): 45–54.
  9. Al-Dohayan AD, et al. Low-dose thoracic spinal anaesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: Efficacy and safety. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018; 12(2): 203–208.
  10. Kararmaz A, et al. Thoracic spinal anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Experience with 200 patients. J Clin Anesth. 2003; 15(7): 520–523.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Evaluation of Ketamine–Dexmedetomidine and Pentazocine Promethazine for Day Care Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3380-3385
Research Article Open Access
Evaluation of Fetal Biometry Parameters in Predicting Gestational Age and Growth Abnormalities
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3361-3367
Research Article Open Access
Optimal Combined Anteversion in Total Hip Replacement for Indian Population: A Prospective Functional Outcome Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3293-3297
Research Article Open Access
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Closure Versus Primary Closure in Perforation Peritonitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3347-3353
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 2
Citations
5 Views
9 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved