Surgery is one of the most important branches of medical science, and its success depends greatly on the proper use of surgical instruments. Millions of surgical procedures are performed worldwide every day, and surgical instruments play a vital role in ensuring precision, safety, and successful outcomes. Even with skilled surgeons, the absence of appropriate instruments may compromise the effectiveness of a procedure. The importance of surgical instruments has been well recognized in Ayurveda since ancient times. Acharya Sushruta, regarded as the Father of Surgery, provided a comprehensive description of Śastras (sharp surgical instruments) in the Sushruta Samhita. He elaborated on their classification, design, indications, methods of manufacture, and maintenance of sharpness. The detailed knowledge of surgical instrumentation described by Sushruta reflects the advanced state of surgical science in ancient India. In addition to Sushruta, other classical Ayurvedic texts such as Ashtanga Hridaya, Harita Samhita, Hastiayurveda, and Yogaratnakara have also documented various Śastras and their applications in surgical practice. This review aims to explore the conceptual understanding, classification, utility, and significance of Śastras in Ayurvedic surgery and their relevance in contemporary surgical practice.
Yantras are the blunt instruments and Sastras are the Sharp instruments that are considered as two important aspect of the Surgery. Surgical equipment have been identified as one of the main factors contributing to an infection outbreak following surgery, even in most successful cases. The Surgeons in the ancient time consist of good number of surgical instruments. Acharya Susrutha mentioned 20 types of Sastras.1Acharya Vagbhata mentioned 26 kinds of Sastras.2Haritha mentioned 12types of Sastras in HarithaSamhitha.3Palakapya mentioned 10types of Sastras in Hasthi Ayurveda(Treatment for Elephants).4
MATERIALS FOR INSTRUMENTS:
Acharya Susrutha says – ‘A Wise Surgeon should get the instruments made of pure iron and with sharp edges by an expert blacksmith who is skilful and experienced in his craft’.5 Acharya Charaka mentions to cut the navelcord of the newborn ardhadhara type of instrument made of gold, or silver or iron.6Yogarantakara mentioned a cautery of gold, to burn fistulous track around the anus.7
EDGES FOR SHARP INSTRUMENTS
Four different types of edges:8
TYPES OF SASTRAS ACCORDING TO VARIOUS ACHARYAS:
|
ACHARYA SUSHRUTA - 20 TYPES |
ACHARYA VAGBATTA -26 TYPES |
HARITHA SAMHITA -12 TYPES |
HASTI AYURVEDA (PALAKAPYA)-10 TYPES |
|
Mandalagra |
Mandalagra |
Ardhachandra |
Vriddhipatra |
|
Karapatra |
Vrddhipatra |
Vrihimukha |
Kusapatra |
|
Vrddhipatra |
Utpalapatra |
Kankapatra |
Mandalagra |
|
Nakhasastra |
Adhyarddhadhara |
Kutharika |
Vrihimukha |
|
Mudrika |
Sarpasya |
Karavirakapatraka |
Kuthari |
|
Utpalapatra |
Esandupadamukha, Sucimukha |
Salaka |
Vatsadanta |
|
Arddhadhara |
Vetasa |
Karapatraka |
Utpalapatra |
|
Suci |
Sarari |
Badisha |
Salaka |
|
Kusapatra |
Trikurccaka |
Grudhrapada |
Suci |
|
Atimukha |
Kusapatra |
Suli |
Rampaka |
|
Sararimukha |
Ativadana |
Suci |
|
|
Antarmukha |
Antarmukha |
Mudgara |
|
|
Trikurccaka |
Vrihibaktra |
|
|
|
Kutharika |
Kuthari |
|
|
|
Vrihimukha |
Kura Vakasala |
|
|
|
Ara |
Anglisastra |
|
|
|
Vetasapatraka |
Badisa |
|
|
|
Badisa |
Karapatra |
|
|
|
Dantasanku |
Kartari |
|
|
|
Esani |
Nakhasastra |
|
|
|
|
Dantalekhana |
|
|
|
|
Suci |
|
|
|
|
Kurcca |
|
|
|
|
Khaja |
|
|
|
|
Acha |
|
|
|
|
Karnavedhani |
|
|
Table no. 1 - Types of Sastras according to different Acharyas
TEMPERING OF SHARP INSTRUMENTS (SHASTRA PAYANA):
1) Three types of tempering for sharp instruments:9
2) Acharya Vrudha Sharangadhara mentions about Payana of arrow heads with paste of Pippali, Saindhava and Kushta with Gomutra and heated to red hot. In another instance he mentions about smearing Sastras with Panchalavana, Sarsapa and Madhu and heat them in furnance followed by dipping in water. When the color resembling those of a peacocks feather are displayed then the burning is adequate.10
3) Muni Sukracharya mentions the Payana of swords in Brihat Samhita. A milk from mare, a camel and an elephant, mixture of fish bile, deer milk, horse milk, goat milk, blended with toddy and then with Arka Ksheera, Aja sringa, Paravatha sakrut is fit for piercing stone.11
GOOD AND BAD QUALITIES OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS:
Acharya Susruta mentioned it should have a well-made handle, affording a firm grasp, it should be made of iron of good quality, it should have fine edge, a pleasant shape and a well finished point.
Acharya Susruta points out eight defects of the instrument – they must not be bent, or blunt, or broken, or jagged, or too thick, or too thin, or too long, or too short.12
Acharya Vagbatta also mentioned same defects.13
METHOD OF HOLDING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS:
NISANA – SHARPENING OF THE INSTRUMENTS:
ANCIENT INSTRUMENT CASE
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SASTRAS:
SIX ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTS BY ACHARYA VAGBATTA :
DISCUSSION:
The nomenclature of surgical instruments has evolved over time. Ancient surgeons closely observed nature and named instruments based on the resemblance of their shapes to animals, birds, or natural objects, such as Aatimukha and Shararimukha Śastras. In contrast, modern surgical instruments are often named after the scientists or surgeons who developed them, such as Kocher's forceps, Babcock's forceps, and Mayo's towel clip.
Acharya Sushruta emphasized that Śastras should be made from pure and strong iron. Modern metallurgy has further enhanced instrument quality by incorporating elements such as carbon, chromium, nickel, and silicon, resulting in stainless steel that is corrosion-resistant, durable, and capable of retaining a sharp cutting edge.
Several Śastras described by Sushruta, including Mandalagra, Vriddhipatra, Karapatra, Soochi, Badisha, and Eshani, continue to have similarities with modern surgical instruments and remain relevant in present-day surgical practice. Some instruments are used in modified forms; for example, Karapatra resembles the modern Gigli saw used for bone cutting.
The methods of handling surgical instruments described by Sushruta, such as pencil grip, fingertip grip, and palm grip, are remarkably similar to modern surgical techniques. He also stressed the importance of maintaining sharpness, proper storage, and appropriate indications for each instrument. The resemblance between ancient and modern surgical instruments highlights the advanced surgical knowledge of ancient Ayurvedic scholars and their lasting contribution to the field of surgery.
CONCLUSION:
Acharya Sushruta was one of the earliest surgeons to provide a systematic and detailed description of surgical instruments and their applications. His concepts regarding the design, quality, handling, maintenance, and indications of Śastras demonstrate a profound understanding of surgical science. The wide variety of instruments described in the classical texts reflects the advanced nature of Ayurvedic surgery and provides flexibility in instrument selection according to the surgical requirement. The striking similarities between several classical Śastras and modern surgical instruments further emphasize the scientific relevance of Sushruta's contributions. His pioneering work laid the foundation for the development of surgical instrumentation and operative techniques, justifying his recognition as the "Father of Surgery."
REFERENCE: