International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 116-122
Research Article
Study of Coagulation Profile in Patient with Liver Diseases
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
May 27, 2026
Accepted
June 10, 2026
Published
July 3, 2026
Abstract

Introduction: The liver is the primary site for the synthesis of coagulation factors and regulatory proteins. Hepatic dysfunction disrupts this haemostatic balance, predisposing patients to both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis are significant global health burdens, necessitating a thorough understanding of these complex haemostatic alterations to improve clinical management.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the coagulation profile in patients with liver disease, investigate the association between coagulation abnormalities and disease severity, and assess the risk of clinical bleeding.

Material and Methods: This hospital-based, prospective observational study was conducted from January 2024 to June 2025 at a medical college. A total of 100 clinically and radiologically confirmed liver disease patients (aged 20–70 years) were included. Coagulation parameters—Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), platelet count, and D-dimer—were measured using standard laboratory techniques and compared with existing literature.

Results: The study cohort comprised 79% males and 21% females, with a mean age of 54.4±13.1 years. Cirrhosis (49%) and alcoholic liver disease (30%) were the most common diagnoses. Haemostatic abnormalities were prevalent: 71% of patients exhibited prolonged PT, 84% had prolonged aPTT, 70% demonstrated thrombocytopenia, and 72% showed elevated D-dimer levels. A history of clinical bleeding was observed in 48% of patients, correlating with more pronounced coagulation derangements.

Conclusion: Liver disease, particularly cirrhosis, is associated with significant coagulation abnormalities, reflecting a rebalanced haemostatic state where synthetic impairment and increased fibrinolysis coexist. These profiles serve as valuable indicators of disease progression. Regular assessment of these parameters is essential for evaluating severity and guiding effective patient care.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

The liver acts as a manufacturing facility responsible for the production of the majority of proteins involved in blood clotting. These include procoagulant factors such as fibrinogen, prothrombin, and factors V, VII, IX, X and XI as well as natural anticoagulants including protein C, protein S and antithrombin III. In addition, the liver synthesizes key components of the fibrinolytic system, thereby contributing to the dissolution of clots and maintenance of vascular integrity.1 The liver is responsible for the production of thrombopoietin (also known as the c-Mpl ligand), which is the primary physiological growth factor for megakaryocytes and platelet production. Furthermore, the liver serves as a storage site for essential elements required for haematopoiesis, including iron, vitamin B12, and folic acid. Another important function of the liver is the clearance of activated clotting factors, fibrin degradation products, and other circulating substances once they are no longer required, thereby preventing excessive coagulation and maintaining haemostatic balance. 2 Haemostasis consists of three major components: primary, secondary and fibrinolysis.1

 

Since the liver is involved in both coagulation and anticoagulation pathways, any hepatic dysfunction leads to disruption of this balance, resulting in significant haemostatic abnormalities. An impaired liver may have insufficient capacity to produce adequate quantities of clotting proteins. Even when synthesized, their functional activity may be compromised. Certain liver conditions may also lead to increased intravascular coagulation, resulting in reduced availability of clotting factors. Additionally, impaired clearance of activated clotting factors further contributes to haemostatic imbalance.3 Bleeding in liver disease may result from decreased levels of haemostatic proteins synthesized by the liver. Multiple mechanisms contribute to coagulation abnormalities, including reduced synthesis of clotting factors and natural anticoagulants, vitamin K deficiency, production of abnormal clotting proteins, increased consumption and decreased clearance. Hyper fibrinolysis and in some cases, disseminated intravascular coagulation may also occur.4

 

Several laboratory investigations includes prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), platelet count and platelet function tests. Normally, PT ranges from 11–13 seconds, with mild prolonged and aPTT ranges from 26–40 seconds. Prolongation indicates impaired haemostasis; however, PT-INR does not always accurately predict bleeding risk and should be interpreted cautiously.5 PT mainly reflects vitamin K–dependent clotting factors, whereas aPTT reflects intrinsic pathway factors.6

 

Coagulation followed by fibrinolysis results in decreased fibrinogen levels and increased fibrin degradation products. D-dimer is widely used in the diagnosis of thrombotic conditions.7            In chronic liver disease, levels of natural anticoagulants such as antithrombin III, protein C and protein S are reduced further contributing to haemostatic imbalance.8 Therefore, coagulopathy in liver disease represents a complex rebalanced haemostatic state rather than a purely hypo coagulable condition.3 Normocytic normochromic anaemia is the most common anaemia seen in chronic liver disease and is often associated with chronic inflammation.9

 

The present study is therefore undertaken to evaluate the coagulation profile in patients with liver disease to better understand haemostatic abnormalities and improve patient care.

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES           

The study aims to examine coagulation profile alterations in liver disease patients, assess the association between coagulation abnormalities and liver disease severity, evaluate bleeding risk, and compare findings with similar studies.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This hospital-based, prospective observational study was conducted from January 2024 to June 2025 at Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Ajmer. A total of 100 clinically and radiologically confirmed liver disease patients (aged 20–70 years) were included. Patients without a liver disease diagnosis, pregnant women and individuals with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC). Additionally, patients unwilling to provide complete medical history, those with prior coagulation disorders or taking medications like aspirin, NSAIDs, or anticoagulants, recent blood transfusion recipients (<7 days), and known malignancy cases were excluded. A written informed consent was taken from all patient included in the study. History taking, relevant clinical findings and routine laboratory investigations was done. Permission from the institutional ethical committee was taken for conducting the study.

 

Methodology: Venous blood samples were collected10 using standard phlebotomy techniques. For complete blood count (CBC), 2ml of blood was drawn into a lavender-top tube containing K3EDTA anticoagulant (1.5mg/ml blood). CBC parameters, including hemoglobin, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte count, platelet count, and red blood cell count, were analyzed using an automated analyzer (Sysmex XP-1000), with platelet counts confirmed manually. For coagulation profiling, blood was collected in a vacutainer with 3.2% sodium citrate without a tourniquet to avoid hemoconcentration. Prothrombin time (PT) samples were not refrigerated to prevent F-VII activation, while aPTT plasma was stored at 4°C for up to 4 hours to prevent F-V and FVIII degradation. D-dimer samples were collected in blue-top tubes with 3.2% sodium citrate2.

 

Coagulation parameters—Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), platelet count, and D-dimer—were measured using standard laboratory techniques.

 

Prothrombin Time11 : The prothrombin time measures the clotting time of recalcified plasma in the presence of an optimal concentration of tissue extract (thromboplastin) and indicates the overall efficiency of the extrinsic clotting system.

 

Reagents:  Thromboplastin reagent: This contains Tissue factor and phospholipid.

Normal range of PT: -11 to 13.5 sec

International normalized ratio (INR): - by international sensitivity index chart was provided by the reagent manufacturer. Normal range of INR: -1.0

 

aPTT (Activated partial thromboplastin time)11 : The test measures the clotting time of plasma after the activation of contact factors and the addition of phospholipid and CaCl2 but without added tissue thromboplastin and so indicates the overall efficiency of the intrinsic pathway.

 

Reagents:12 Ck priest, calcium chloride

D-Dimer11 : Sandwich immunoluminometric assay; Use an anti-D-dimer monoclonal antibody to label ABEI, and use another monoclonal antibody to label FITC. Sample, Calibrator or Control, ABEI Label, FITC Label and magnetic micro beads coated with anti-FITC are mixed thoroughly and incubated at 37℃, forming a sandwich; after sediment in a magnetic field, decant the supernatant, then cycle washing for 1 time Subsequently, the starter reagents are added and a flash chemiluminescent reaction is initiated. The light signal is measured by a photomultiplier as RLU within 3 seconds and is proportional to the concentration of D-DIMER present in controls or samples.

 

Statistical analysis: The qualitative data was expressed in proportions and percentages and the quantitative data was expressed as mean and standard deviations. The appropriate test was applied using computer software (SPSS Trial version 23 and primer). Statistical significance was kept at p<0.05.

 

RESULTS

Table 1 : Age and Sex Wise Distribution of Cases with Liver Disease

 

Number of Patients

Percentage

Age Range (years)

20-40

20

20

41-60

41

41

61-80

39

39

Mean Age (years)

54.4±13.1

Sex Distribution

Male

79

79

Female

21

21

 

Table 2 : Distribution of Patients According to Ultrasonographic Findings

USG

Number of Patients

Percentage

Gross Ascites with Hepatomegaly

60

60

Moderate Ascites

19

19

Mild Ascites

12

12

Ascites with Hepatosplenomegaly

6

6

Hetero-echoic lesion

3

3

Total

100

100

 

Table 3 : Distribution of Patients According to  Clinical Diagnosis

Clinical Diagnosis

Number of Patients

Percentage

Cirrhosis

49

49

Alcoholic Liver Disease

30

30

Non-Alcoholic Liver Disease

9

9

Viral Hepatitis

9

9

Liver Abscess

3

3

Total

100

100

              

Table 4 : Mean Values of Liver Function and Coagulation Profile Parameters among Patients

Parameter

Mean

SD

LFT

AST (IU/L)

192.9

159.5

ALT (IU/L)

101.8

76.5

ALP (IU/L)

99

49.7

Coagulations Profile

PT (sec.)

25.62

15.54

INR

2.95

3.83

APTT (Sec.)

52.69

26.38

Platelets Count (K)

174.21

122.62

D-Dimer (μg/ml)

3.91

2.77

                            

Table 5 : Distribution of Patients According to Prothrombin Time (PT) Severity; Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Severity; Platelets Count Severity; and D-Dimer Levels

Parameter

Number

Percentage

Prothrombin Time (Sec.)

Normal (11 to 13)

29

29

Mildly Prolonged (14-20)

54

54

Moderately Prolonged (21-50)

18

18

Severely Prolonged (>51)

8

8

aPTT

Normal (25 -29)

16

16

Mildly Prolonged (30 - 50)

59

59

Moderately Prolonged (51-100)

15

15

Severely Prolonged (>100)

10

10

Platelets Count (K)

Normal (150-400)

30

30

Mild thrombocytopenia    (75-150)

45

45

Moderate thrombocytopenia  (50-75)

13

13

Severely thrombocytopenia (< 50)

12

12

D-Dimer (μg/ml)

Normal (< 0.5)

28

28

Elevated (> 0.5)

72

72

 

Table 6 : Variations in Coagulation Parameters by Hepatic Pathology

Coagulation Parameters

Cirrhosis

Alcoholic Liver Disease

NALD

Viral Hepatitis

Liver Abscess

PT

Moderate

Normal

Normal

Normal/Mild

Mild

aPTT

Moderate

Mild

Normal

Normal

Mild

Platelets Count

Mild

Mild

Mild

Normal

Normal

D-dimer

Elevated

Normal

Normal

Normal

Normal

 

Table 7 : Correlation of Hemostatic Markers with Clinical Bleeding Status

Coagulation Parameters

Bleeders (n=48)

Non-Bleeders (n=52)

PT

Moderate

Normal

aPTT

Moderate

Mild

Platelets Count

Moderate

Mild

D-dimer

Elevated

Normal

 

DISCUSSION

The present study was conducted from January 2024 to June 2025 on 100 cases of liver diseased. The mean age observed was 54.42 ± 13.16 years, which was comparable to the study of Raza F et al. (2025)14 (46.2 ± 14.5 years).

 

In the present study, males constituted 79% of the study population, while females accounted for 21%, demonstrating a marked male predominance among patients with liver disease. The gender distribution observed in the present study closely resembles that reported by Raut AA et al. (2025)17 who documented 78% males and 22% females. (Table 1)

 

In the present study, cirrhosis was the most common liver disease, accounting for 49% of cases, followed by alcoholic liver disease at 30%. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD/NASH) and viral hepatitis each contributed 9.00% of the cases, while liver abscess constituted 3.00% of the study population. In the present study, the prevalence of cirrhosis observed in the (49%) was highly. Similarly, Raut AA et al.17 documented cirrhosis in 45% of patients, which closely resembles our findings. In the present study, the prevalence of alcoholic liver disease observed in (30%) was represented the second most common etiology. The prevalence observed in our study was higher than that reported by Melkamu A et al. (8.4%)16.  In the present study, the prevalence of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD/NASH) accounted for 9% of cases. The prevalence observed in our study was higher than that reported by Mistry PA et al. (3%)19. In the present study, viral hepatitis accounted for 9% of cases. The prevalence was lower than that reported by Raja F et al. (24.2%)14. In the present study, Liver abscess accounted for 3% of cases was highly similar to the study by Shakyawal B et al (2.7%)15. (Table 3)

 

In the present study, the mean AST, ALT, and ALP levels were 192.9 IU/L, 101.8 IU/L, and 99 IU/L respectively.  Mistry PA et al. (2024)19 study reported mean AST and ALT levels of 123 IU/L and 124.6 IU/L, respectively. In contrast, the present study demonstrated substantially higher AST levels and a clear predominance of AST over ALT. In the present study, the mean AST value was found to be 192.9 IU/L which was markedly higher than the mean ALT value of 101.8 IU/L.

 

In the present study, the mean Prothrombin Time (PT) was 25.6 ± 15.5 seconds. Similarly, Agrawal KV et al. (2023)20 reported 27±13 seconds . In the present study, the mean International Normalized Ratio (INR) was 2.9 ± 3.8 was higher than the values reported by Aryaprabha et al. (2023)21 (1.7 ± 2.6). In the present study the mean Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) was 52.6 ± 26.3 seconds. Similarly, study by Mistry PA et al. (2024)19 (48.9 ± 19.3 seconds). In the present study, the mean platelet count was 174.2±122.6 × 10³/µL which was similar to the study by Mistry PA et al. (2024)19 (177.8 ± 121.2× 10³/µL). In the present study, the mean D-dimer level was 3.9 ± 2.7 µg/mL, similarly reported by Agrawal KV et al. (2023)20 (3.7 ± 3.9 µg/mL). Overall, the coagulation profile observed in the present study indicates significant impairment of hemostatic function, particularly among patients with advanced liver dysfunction and cirrhosis. (Table 4)

 

In the present study, based on severity grading, 30.0% of patients had normal PT values (11–13 seconds), while 70.0% demonstrated varying degrees of PT prolongation. Mild prolongation (14–20 seconds) was observed in 49.0% of cases, moderate prolongation (21–50 seconds) in 15.0% and severe prolongation (>51 seconds) in 6.0% of patients. When compared with previous studies, the mean PT in the present study (25.62 ± 15.53 seconds) was higher than that reported by Patil AY et al. (2020)6 (18.50 ± 11.56 seconds). The proportion of patients with normal PT values in the present study (30.0%) was identical to that reported by the findings of Kotadiya TP et al. (2018)23 (25.0%). In the present study, the combined prevalence of mild and moderate PT prolongation was 64.0%, which is comparable to the proportions reported by Bhatia G et al.  (2017)24 (62.0%). (Table 5)

 

In the present study, only 16.0% of patients had normal APTT values (25–29 seconds), whereas 84.0% demonstrated varying degrees of prolongation. Mild prolongation (30–50 seconds) was observed in 45.0% of cases, moderate prolongation (51–100 seconds) in 29.0% and severe prolongation (>100 seconds) in 10.0% of patients. The mean APTT observed in the present study (52.69 ± 26.37 seconds) was substantially higher than that reported by Patil AY et al. (2020)6 (35.56 ± 19.85 seconds). The proportion of patients with normal APTT values in the present study (16.0%) was lower than that reported by Srinivas GKP et al. (2025)22 (30.0%). Mild APTT prolongation was observed in 45.0% of patients which was comparable to the 48.33% reported by Patil AY et al. (2020)6. Moderate prolongation was present in 29.0% of cases, compared with 5.0% reported by Patil AY et al. (2020)6. 74.0% of patients demonstrated moderate degrees of APTT prolongation, a proportion slightly higher than that reported by Srinivas GKP et al.  (2025)22. Severe APTT prolongation (>100 seconds) was observed in 10.0% of patients in the present study, compared with only 2.5% reported by Patil AY et al. (2020)6. Overall, the significantly prolonged APTT values observed in the present study highlight the severity of coagulation abnormalities associated with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis. (Table 5)

 

The mean platelet count observed in the present study (174.21 ± 122.62 × 10³/µL) was lower than that reported by Garg RP et al. (2020)13 (215.70 ± 79.60 × 10³/µL). The proportion of patients with normal platelet counts in the present study (30.0%) was comparable to the findings of Garg RP et al. (2020)13 (29.0%). In the present study, the combined prevalence of mild and moderate thrombocytopenia was 58.0%, which was comparable to the rates reported by Mistry PA et al. (2024)19 (51.0%). Severe thrombocytopenia (<50 × 10³/µL) was observed in 12.0% of patients in the present study.  (Table 5)

 

In the present study, a threshold of 0.5 μg/mL was used to categorize D-dimer levels. Normal D-dimer levels (≤0.5 μg/mL) were observed in 28% of patients while 72% showed elevated levels (>0.5 μg/mL). These findings are comparable to those reported by Rai V et al. (2017)26, who observed normal D-dimer levels in 30% and elevated levels in 70% of patients. Bohania N et al. (2021)27 reported a higher prevalence of elevated D-dimer levels (86.67%), with only 13.33% of patients having normal values. In contrast, Garg RP et al. (2020)13 found elevated D-dimer levels in 58% of cases and normal levels in 42%, suggesting the inclusion of patients with less severe liver dysfunction. (Table 5)

 

CONCLUSION

Advanced liver disease, particularly cirrhosis and alcoholic liver disease was associated with significant coagulation abnormalities that were commonly observed in middle-aged and elderly male patients. These abnormalities included prolonged Prothrombin Time (PT), prolonged Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), thrombocytopenia and elevated D-dimer levels, reflecting impaired hepatic synthetic function and disease progression. Such derangements were important indicators of liver dysfunction and may contribute to complications associated with portal hypertension.

 

Therefore, regular assessment of coagulation parameters may be useful for evaluating disease severity and guiding patient management. In contrast, patients with chronic hepatitis or early-stage liver disease may initially demonstrate normal laboratory findings despite underlying hemostatic alterations. This phenomenon is explained by a rebalanced hemostatic state in which both bleeding and thrombotic risks coexist. In the present study, elevated D-dimer levels were observed in 72% of patients, suggesting that D-dimer may serve as a valuable marker of advanced liver disease and ongoing coagulation activation.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Department of Pathology, JLN Medical College, Ajmer; and the contribution of Dr. Shailendra Vashistha (Assistant Professor, Transplant Immunology HLA Lab, Dept of IHTM, GMC, Kota) and the VAssist Team (www.thevassist.com) in manuscript editing and submission process.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Greer JP, Arber DA, Glader B. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer. 2019; Section 5.
  2. McPherson RA, Pincus MR, editors. Henry's clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 24th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2021;821-70.
  3. Kujovich JL. Hemostasis and Thrombosis in Liver Disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2015; 19(1): 1–17.
  4. Devrajani BR, Shah SZA, Devrajani T, Das T, Rahman UA, Talpur AAM. Coagulopathies in patients with liver cirrhosis. World Appl Sci J. 2012;16(1):105–9.
  5. Wei Y, Li J, Zhang L, Zheng D, Shi B, Cong Y. Assessment of validity of INR system for patients with liver disease associated with viral hepatitis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010;30(1):84-9. 
  6. Patil AY, Suryawanshi PB, Deshpande SA. Evaluation of coagulation profile in patients with chronic liver disease. Int J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(3):15–20.
  7. Dangana A, Ibrahim A, Musa A. D-dimer levels and fibrinolytic activity in chronic liver disease patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2023;37(4):e24876.
  8. Daniel WW, editor. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999. Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health science.
  9. Haider E, Khan S, Ali M, Joshi D, Akram M, Das K. Hematological abnormalities in chronic liver disease patients. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43210.
  10. Giavarina D, Lippi G. Blood venous sample collection: Recommendations overview and a checklist to improve quality. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(10–11):568–73.
  11. ARKRAY Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. ThromboSpan LSPT: Brain thromboplastin with calcium reagent for prothrombin time (Package Insert/Instruction Manual). Surat, Gujarat, India: ARKRAY Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.; 2016.
  12. Diagnostica Stago. STA®–C.K. Prest® 5: Determination of the Kaolin-Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT). Package Insert. Asnières-sur-Seine, France: Diagnostica Stago SAS; 2008.
  13. Garg RP, Agrawal A, Bhake AS, Vagha S. Correlation study of coagulation profile in spectrum of liver diseases. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(08):549-54.
  14. Raza F, Shoba KL, Amrutha. Coagulation profile in patients with liver disease: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital Mandya. Int J Med Pub Health 2025; 15 (3): 932-5.
  15. Shakyawal B, Fagna RR, Dosi M. A cross sectional study of coagulation profile in various liver diseases at tertiary care centre. Int J Pharma Clin Res. 2024;16(4):256-60.
  16. Melkamu A, Woldu B, Sitotaw C Seyoum M, Aynalem M. The magnitude and associated factors of coagulation abnormalities among liver disease patients at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Northwest, Ethiopia, 2022. Thrombosis J. 2023;21:35.
  17. Raut AA, Deshmukh AT. Correlation of liver diseases with coagulation abnormalities: A tertiary care hospital-based study. J Med Excell 2025;2:10-4.
  18. Prajapati S, Shah MM, Gidwani RK, Goswami S, Shah V N, Prajapati A. Coagulation profile in liver diseases: A study of 250 cases in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Clin Diag. Pathol. 2020;3(3):185-8.
  19. Mistry PA, Patel PN, Patel K, Gauswami NP. Correlation of coagulation profile in liver disease patients in tertiary care hospital. Int J Pharma Clin Res. 2024;16(6);2071-6.
  20. Agrawal KV, Dhawle MS, Joshi AR. The prospective study of coagulation profile in chronic liver diseases at tertiary care centre. Int J Sci Res. 2023; 12(5):36-8.
  21. Aryaprabha SS, Chaithra H. Haematological and coagulation profile in liver cirrhosis. IJNRD. 2023; 8(5):j327-j334.
  22. Srinivas GKP, Ramalingam A, Suresh A, Malaiyan J. Coagulation Profile Alterations in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Study of Clinical and Diagnostic Implications. J Neonatal Surg. 2025;14(16S):949-55.
  23. Kotadiya TP, Khant V, Prajapati B. A study of coagulation profile in diseases of liver: At tertiary care center hospital. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2019;6(1):107-11.
  24. Bhatia G, Kaushik S, Kumar R, Kishore S, Bhatia U. Coagulation Profile in Liver Diseases: A Study of 300 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Uttarakhand, India. Int. J. Adv. Integr. Med. Sc. 2017;2(2):61-4.
  25. Sarwar F, Khan S, Yasmeen F,Abbas N, Faiz W. Coagulation profile in patients with liver disease: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital. J Sheikh Zayed Med Coll (JSZMC). 2025;15(02):3-6.
  26. Rai V, Dhameja N, Kumar S, Shukla J, Singh R, Dixit KV. Haemostatic profile of patients with chronic liver disease- its correlation with severity and outcome. J Clin. Diag. Res. 2017; 11(8): EC24-EC26.
  27. Bohania N, Agrawal A, Prakash A, Nangia A, Kumar A. coagulation profile and its correlation with severity of liver dysfunction and gastrointestinal bleed in alcoholic liver disease patients. J Assoc. Phys.Ind. 2021; 69:63-7.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Study of Comparison of Conventional Nasal Pack with Merocele Nasal Pack in the Management of Epistaxis
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 79-85
Research Article Open Access
Impact of Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Shoulder Pain
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 110-115
Research Article Open Access
Clinical Study on Etiopathogenesis of Hoarseness of Voice at Tertiary Care Hospital
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 66-72
Research Article Open Access
Burden and Outcomes of Bacterial and Fungal Infections in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 60-65
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 4
Citations
7 Views
8 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved