International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 2156-2160
Original Article
Study comparing platelet indices between stable angina, acute coronary syndrome with age sex matched normal controls
 ,
Received
Nov. 28, 2025
Accepted
Dec. 16, 2025
Published
Dec. 31, 2025
Abstract

Background: Platelet activation is a key factor in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) and associated acute symptoms. Mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and plateletcrit (PCT) are all easy and cheap blood tests that show how reactive platelets are. They could also be used as stand-ins for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Objectives: To compare platelet indices (MPV, PDW, PCT, and platelet count) among patients with acute coronary syndrome, stable angina, and age- and sex-matched healthy controls, and to evaluate their potential value in predicting ACS.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional comparison study was undertaken at Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital cum Medical Research Institute in Jaipur, India, from September 2020 to August 2021. A total of 150 volunteers were recruited and categorized into three groups: acute coronary syndrome (n=50), stable angina (n=50), and healthy controls (n=50). We used an automated hematology analyzer (XN-1000 Sysmex) to assess platelet indices in blood samples that had been treated with EDTA to stop them from clotting. We used one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests to do the statistical analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age and sex distribution were similar among the three groups (p>0.05). The mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW) were significantly elevated in cases (acute coronary syndrome and stable angina) relative to controls (MPV: p<0.001; PDW: p=0.003). The ACS group had the highest MPV and PDW values, although the difference between ACS and stable angina was not statistically significant. Platelet count was considerably reduced in ACS patients relative to those with stable angina (p=0.045). ROC curve study indicated that MPV and PDW provide limited discriminatory power for predicting ACS, however increased sensitivity was noted at lower cut-off values.
Conclusion: MPV and PDW are markedly enhanced in individuals with coronary artery disease, especially in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), indicating heightened platelet activation. While their specificity is constrained, these indices may function as adjunctive, economical screening indicators for patients exhibiting probable ACS and stable angina when analyzed in conjunction with clinical and biochemical metrics.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

There has been growing increase in cases of coronary artery disease in epidemic proportion in India. Platelets have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disorders including atherosclerosis and its complications such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (UA) and sudden cardiac death. The acute coronary syndromes (ACS) includes ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), Non ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA). Platelets not only act as mediators in thrombus formation but have potent inflammatory properties. They induce inflammatory response in nearby adjacent cells like leukocytes and endothelial cells. This bidirectional interaction between platelets and inflammatory cells causes continuing or non resolving inflammation in atherosclerosis1,2 .The increased platelet reactivity causing shorter bleeding time is associated with increased platelet volume. The larger sized platelets with higher volume have more dense granules consequently they are more active enzymatically and metabolically with higher thrombotic potential.These metabolically active platelets have higher level of procoagulatory surface proteins such as β selectin and glycoprotein III a4,5 .The acute coronary syndrome have been shown to be assosciated with higher mean platelet volume (MPV). MPV been marker of platelet function and is indicative of more reactive platelets which are associated with myocardial damage in ACS. The higher MPV has been associated with unfavourable outcome among survivor of AMI6,7. Therefore larger platelets as measured by hematological analyzers (MPV) may be useful marker in patients with ACS. It could play an important role in the early detection of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and , could be beneficial in strategies for preventive treatment. The other platelet index – platelet distribution width (PDW) provides information about the range of platelet size in blood sample and is more specific indicator of platelet activation than MPV as it does not increase during platelet swelling.8,9,10 Patients with higher plateletcrit (PCT) and PDW are at increased risk of ACS.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross sectional study was carried out at Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital cum Medical Research Institute Jaipur,india from 1 september 2020 to  30 august 2021. Sample Size was calculated at 80% study power and alpha error of .05, expecting standard deviation of 10.6 for PLCR as found in reference study. For minimum detectable difference in PLCR of 7 as found in reference study between stable and unstable angina group.46 patients in each of these groups are required as sample size which is further enhanced and rounded off to 50 patients in each of 3 groups as final sample size for present study expecting 10% attrition. Formula used for sample size as follows- n = (Zα/2 + Zβ)2 * 2*σ/d2 Where Zα/2 is the critical value of normal distribution at α/2 (e.g. for a confidential level of 95%, α is 0.05 and the critical value is 1.96), Zβ is the critical value of normal distribution at β (e.g. for a power of 80%, β is 0.2 and the critical value is 0.84), σ2 is the population variance, and d is the difference we would like to detect

 

3 groups were included in the study each consisting of 50 patients.GROUP 1   Age >18 years. Patient with diagnosis of ACS based on ECG or Echocardiography or Positive Trop-T, or h/o typical resting chest pain. 3 Those who consent for participation in study. GROUP 2  Age >18 years.  Patients with Diagnosis of stable CAD (angina on exertion), absence of dynamic ECG and Echocardiographic changes, negative Trop-T.  Those who consent for participation in study.

 

Critically ill patients. , Platelet disorders like thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis, Patients with clotting disorders,Participants who did not give consent for being part of study are excluded from the study5 ml of blood samples were drawn in EDTA vaccutainer from antecubital vein. Samples were runned within 2hrs of vein puncture using XN-19 1000SYSMEX and platelet indices (MPV, PDW, PCT), relevant investigations like ECG, Cardiac Enzymes (Trop-T) were analysed for confirmation of diagnosis. Parameters on automated analyzer: MPV, Platelet distribution width, plateletcrit, platelet count. A written informed consent was obtained from the participants before collecting samples.

 

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS- Quantitative variables will be summarized as mean,standard deviation and will be analysed by using one way ANOVA test and other parametric test to find out the statistical difference in the three groups average values

 

Nominal and categorical variables will be presumed as proportions and will be analysed using chi2 test and other non parametric tests.

 

p value<0.05 will be taken as significant .

SPSS version 20 software will be used for all statistical calculations

 

RESULTS

Total 150 cases were collected from the department of cardiology for this study between 1 september 2020 to 30 august 2021

Table No. 1: Mean values of age and platelet indices in cases and control

Parameter

Diagnosis

N

Mean

SD

Min.

Max.

‘p’ value*

 

Age

Cases

100

57.61

11.00

35

88

 

0.481

Control

50

58.86

8.37

45

82

 

PCT

Cases

100

0.28

0.08

0.1

0.59

 

0.203

Control

50

0.26

0.12

0.05

0.56

 

Platelet Count

Cases

100

246.84

84.24

84

566

 

0.837

Control

50

244.00

68.38

150

413

 

PDW

Cases

100

14.38

3.32

8.8

22.9

 

0.003

Control

50

12.71

2.74

8

21.5

 

MPV

Cases

100

11.50

1.34

8.7

15.1

 

<0.001

Control

50

10.70

1.02

8.2

13.3

 

  1. There is significant difference in PDW between cases and control

2.               There is significant difference in MPV between cases and control

 

Table No.2

Parameter

Diagnosis

N

Mean

SD

Min.

Max.

‘p’ value*

‘p’<0.05 from**

 

 

Age

ACS

50

57.82

10.69

38

88

 

 

0.764

 

SA

50

57.40

11.41

35

78

Control

50

58.86

8.37

45

82

 

 

PCT

ACS

50

0.27

0.07

0.1

0.44

 

 

0.256

 

SA

50

0.29

0.09

0.12

0.59

Control

50

0.26

0.12

0.05

0.56

 

 

Platelet Count

ACS

50

227.26

73.28

101

427

 

 

0.045

SA

SA

50

266.42

90.47

84

566

ACS

Control

50

244.00

68.38

150

413

 

 

 

PDW

ACS

50

14.64

3.25

8.9

22.9

 

 

0.007

Control

SA

50

14.11

3.40

8.8

22.7

 

Control

50

12.71

2.74

8

21.5

ACS

 

 

MPV

ACS

50

11.71

1.25

8.7

14.2

 

 

<0.001

Control

SA

50

11.30

1.40

8.9

15.1

Control

Control

50

10.70

1.02

8.2

13.3

ACS,SA

* ANOVA - Analysis of Variance                                                                               **Bonferroni t-test

 

1.               Significant difference in platelet count between ACS and stable angina. The platelet count were significantly lower in ACS patient as compared to stable patient.

  1. There is significant difference in PDW between ACS and control, stable angina and

3.               There is significant difference in MPV between ACS and control, stable and control.

  1. MPV and PDW was greater in ACS patient compared to stable but the difference was statistically non significant

 

 

 

Table No. 3: ROC curve for ACS

Area under the ROC curve (AUC)

0.554

Standard Errora

0.0580

95% Confidence intervalb

0.451 to 0.653

z statistic

0.928

Significance level P (Area=0.5)

0.3535

 

Table No. 4: ROC for PDW

Area under the ROC curve (AUC)

0.544

Standard Errora

0.0585

95% Confidence intervalb

0.442 to 0.644

z statistic

0.759

Significance level P (Area=0.5)

0.4478

Criterion values and coordinates of the ROC curve

 

Criterion

Sensitivity

95% CI

Specificity

95% CI

+LR

-LR

>11 *

92.00

80.8 - 97.8

24.00

13.1 - 38.2

1.21

0.33

Criterion corresponding with highest Youden index

 

 

DISCUSSION

Platelet activation plays a central role in the transformation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) into its potentially major adverse clinical events, such as ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Increased platelet activation may also represent the net patho-physiological effects of a number of CVD risk factors, such as smoking and raised cholesterol, thus representing a broad marker of CVD risk. Platelet activation leads to changes in platelet shape (increasingly spherical) with increased platelet swelling leading to an increase in platelet mass and volume. Traditional measures of platelet function/activation, such as the quantification of platelet derived metabolic parameters and the use of platelet aggregometry are technically difficult. Acute coronary syndrome result from acceleration of this chronic process characterized by rupture or fissuring of an unstable atherosclerotic plaque, accompanied by a cascade of platelet reactions resulting into thrombus formation11.Platelets play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic complications, contributing to thrombus formation or apposition after plaque rupture. After rupture of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary arteries, platelets hyperactivity and local platelets activation have been suggested to play a causal role in prothrombotic events leading to MI. An increased platelet reactivity and shortened bleeding time are associated with increased platelet volume, therefore; platelet size has been considered to reflect platelet level of activity as the large platelets are more active than small platelets and they have a higher thrombotic potential due to high concentration of thromboxane A2.11

We conducted a hospital based cross sectional comparative study with an aim to study the platelet indices in patients with ACS (acute coronary syndrome) and stable angina and to assess whether increase in platelet indices are associated with increased risk of ACS when compared with the stable angina population.

 

All study participants were similar in terms of age and sex. Mean age of cases was 57.61± 11 years while mean age of controls was 58.86± 8.37 years (p > 0.05) (Table1, Fig.1). The age group is younger by a decade in comparison to developed countries. Our finding is in concordance with other studies from Asia where there is increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in younger population.12,13 In an another study14 comprising of ACS and normal healthy controls on MPV the mean age of ACS patient group was 58.7± 11.9 years which was similar to our study. ACS group, 36 (72%) were male and 14 (28%) were female. In stable angina group, 32 (64%) were male and 18 (36%) were female, while in control group, 33 (66%) were male and 17 (34%) were female (p > 0.05) (Table 3, Fig. 6). Among 50 ACS patients, 14 were diagnosed to have STEMI, 21 as NSTEMI and 15 as unstable angina on the basis of ECG and Troponin levels. As far as smoking history is concerned, there were 32 (64%) smokers in ACS group and 28 (56%) in stable angina group (Table 4, Fig. 7). The history of hypertension was noted in 24 (48%) of ACS patients while in stable angina group a slightly higher 30 (60%) patients were hypertensive (Table 5, Fig. 8). 20 (40%) of patients in ACS group and 18 (36%) in stable angina group were diabetic. (Table 6, Fig. 9) Family history of coronary artery disease was present in 7 (14%) of ACS patients in comparison to 5 (10%) patients of stable angina group (Table 7, Fig 10). The stable angina group had higher number of patients taking antiplatelet medications, 13(26%) in comparison to ACS group where only 2 (4%) patients on antiplatelet drugs (Table 8, Fig. 11). In our study, among 100 cases of ACS and stable angina, mean platelet volume (MPV) ranged from 8.7 fl to 15.1 fl, (mean of 11.5 ± 1.34 fl), while MPV of controls ranged from 8.2 fl to 13.3 fl, (mean of 10.7 ± 1.02 fl). The difference was statistically significant (p <0.001) (Table 1).

 

 

CONCLUSION

In our study PDW and MPV showed statistically significant difference between cases and controls with p values 0.003 and < 0.001) respectively. • The MPV and PDW values were higher in ACS group than the stable angina group although the result was not statistically significant. • Based on our study, the cut off value for predicting cardiovascular disease with 94% sensitivity and 26% specificity was 10.1 fl. • Based on our study, 11fl PDW cut off had 92% sensitivity and 25% specificity for predicting cardiovascular disease. • MPV and PDW therefore can be used very carefully as a screening tool for patients of ACS and unstable angina. • The significant difference between MPV and PDW in control, patients with ACS and stable angina could help us in screening patients visiting cardiac OPD for undergoing cardiovascular disease

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Trip MD, Cats VK, van Capelle FJL. Platelet hyperreactivity and prognosisin survivors of myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 1990; 322:1549–54.
  2. Aukrust P, Halvorsen B, Ueland T, Activated platelets and atherosclerosis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc 2010;8(9):1297-307.
  3. Eldor A, Avizour M, Or Production of haemorrhagic diathesis in thrombocytopenia by mean platelet volume. BMJ. 1982;285:397-400.
  4. Boos CJ, Lip GY. Platelet activation and cardiovascular outcomes inacute coronary syndromes. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2542-3.
  5. Haver VM, Gear ARL. Functional fractionation of platelets. J Lab Clin Med. 1981;97:187-204.
  6. Kilicli-Camur N, Demirtunc R, Konuralp Could mean platelet volume be a predictive marker for acute myocardial infarction? Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:387-92.
  7. Bharihoke N, Subhedar V, Singh P, Gupta P. Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) & Other Platelet indices in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) & Stable Coronary Artery Diseases (SCAD). Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2014;1(15):1921-1926.
  8. Singhal G, Pathak V. The relationship between mean platelet volume and coronary collateral vessels in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences. 2016;2(3):169.
  9. Kumar V, Melhotra S, Ahuja Ret RC and Viash AK. Platelet and Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Fam Med. 2016; 3(4): 1063.
  10. Thompson CB, Jakubowski JA, Quinn PG. Platelet size as a determinant of platelet function. J Lab Clin Med. 1983;101(2):205-13.
  11. Siva Prasad Akula, Venkata Siva Krishna.K, Rama Krishna J, B Srinivas, Seshagirirao A Study of Platelet Indices in Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Study. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 16, Issue 6 Ver. XII (June. 2017), PP 10-13 www.iosrjournals.org DOI: 10.9790/0853-1606121013 www.iosrjournals.org
  12. Grover A, Bahl A, Vijayvergiya R. Changing trends of cardiovascular disease in India: Implications for prevention based on 2001 census. Indian J Cardiol. 2003; 6:59–63.
  13. Deepshikha Sharma, Manju Pandey, J. P Rishi. A Study of platelet volume indices in patients of coronary artery diseases. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research. 2016; 5(5): 161-164.
  14. Mercan R. Mean platelet volume in acute coronary syndromes. Van Tıp Derg 2010;17:89 95.
Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
Pulse Oximetry (SpO₂) Monitoring as a Prognostic Indicator in Emergency Department Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 292-294
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17680714
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue 6
Citations
11 Views
10 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved