International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 2133-2138
Original Article
PREVALENCE OF SUBCLINICAL THYROID DYSFUNCTION AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Sept. 13, 2025
Accepted
Oct. 17, 2025
Published
Oct. 20, 2025
Abstract

Background: Thyroid dysfunction, especially subclinical thyroid abnormalities, is more prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to complex metabolic and endocrine interactions. Early detection is crucial to optimize metabolic control and reduce long-term complications. This study evaluates the prevalence, pattern, and determinants of subclinical thyroid dysfunction among T2DM patients in northeastern West Bengal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 172 T2DM patients attending a tertiary care hospital. Demographic, clinical, biochemical, and thyroid parameters (TSH, FT3, FT4, Anti-TPO) were assessed. Thyroid dysfunction was classified as per ATA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Thyroid dysfunction was present in 55.8% of patients. Subclinical hypothyroidism (32.6%) was the most prevalent subtype. Thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher in females (p = 0.017). Dyslipidemia (77.9%), neuropathy (57%), nephropathy (30.2%), and Anti-TPO positivity (31.4%) were more common among thyroid-abnormal patients. Longer diabetes duration was associated with subclinical hypothyroidism.

Conclusion: Subclinical thyroid dysfunction is highly prevalent in T2DM patients. Routine thyroid screening should be integrated into diabetes follow-up, particularly in females, patients with long-standing diabetes, and those with poor metabolic control.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major global public health concern, with India currently ranking among the countries with the highest burden [1]. Chronic hyperglycemia in T2DM leads to metabolic derangements affecting multiple organs and endocrine axes [2]. Thyroid dysfunction (TD) is the most common endocrine disorder coexisting with diabetes, and both conditions influence each other through several hormonal and metabolic pathways [3].

 

The thyroid gland regulates metabolic rate, lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and thermogenesis. Even mild alterations in thyroid function—termed subclinical thyroid dysfunction—can affect insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular function [4]. Subclinical hypothyroidism, characterized by elevated TSH with normal free T4, is particularly common in T2DM and is associated with dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, and increased cardiovascular risk [5].

 

Studies across the world have reported varying prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among T2DM patients, ranging from 10% to 46% [6–10]. Radaideh et al. (2004) reported 12.5% prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in T2DM patients [7], while Wang et al. (2017) identified thyroid disease as significantly more common in diabetes compared to the general population [8]. Indian data also demonstrate high prevalence, with Gupta et al. reporting 14.6% and Singh et al. reporting 22% thyroid dysfunction in T2DM cohorts [9,10].

Mechanisms linking thyroid dysfunction and T2DM include insulin resistance, autoimmune predisposition, alterations in deiodinase activity, and dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid (HPT) axis [11]. Anti-TPO antibody-mediated autoimmunity further contributes to subclinical hypothyroidism in diabetics [12].

Given regional variations and limited data from northeastern India, this study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and pattern of subclinical thyroid dysfunction in T2DM patients attending a tertiary care hospital.

 

Objectives:

  1. To determine the prevalence of subclinical thyroid dysfunction among patients with T2DM.
  2. To assess the pattern and distribution of thyroid abnormalities in T2DM.
  3. To evaluate the association between thyroid dysfunction and demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters.

 

Materials and Methods:

(With continuous reference numbers)

Study Design and Setting

This was a hospital-based cross-sectional observational study conducted at the Department of Medicine, MJN Medical College & Hospital, Coochbehar (West Bengal), a tertiary care center with a large diabetic population [13].

Study Period: April 2024 to January 2025.

Sample Size Calculation

The minimum sample size was calculated using the formula for prevalence studies:
N = Z²pq / d² [14]
Assuming p = 12.4% (previous Indian prevalence) [9], d = 5%, the sample size obtained was 167. A total of 172 patients were included.

 

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged ≥18 years
  • Established T2DM as per ADA criteria
  • Willing to participate

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known thyroid disease or ongoing thyroid therapy
  • Pregnancy or gestational diabetes
  • Use of drugs influencing thyroid profile (amiodarone, lithium)
  • Critically ill patients

 

Data Collection

A structured proforma recorded:

  • Demographics (age, sex)
  • Duration of diabetes
  • Symptoms
  • BMI, waist–hip ratio
  • Complications (neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy)

 

Laboratory Investigations

  • Thyroid profile: TSH, FT3, FT4 (chemiluminescence)
  • Anti-TPO antibodies
  • Glycemic profile: FBS, PPBS, HbA1c
  • Lipid profile
  • Renal parameters: urea, creatinine, ACR

Thyroid dysfunction was classified per ATA Guidelines (2012)

  • Subclinical hypothyroidism: ↑TSH, normal FT4
  • Subclinical hyperthyroidism: ↓TSH, normal FT3/FT4
  • Overt hypo-/hyperthyroidism: abnormal TSH + abnormal FT3/FT4

 

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using the Chi-square test, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

 

 

Results & Analysis:

Table 1. Baseline Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants (n = 172)

Variable

Category

n (%)

Age Group (years)

40–55

43 (25.0)

56–70

110 (64.0)

>70

19 (11.0)

Gender

Male

61 (35.5)

Female

111 (64.5)

Education

Illiterate

55 (32.0)

Primary

59 (34.3)

Secondary

45 (26.2)

Graduate

13 (7.6)

 

Most participants belonged to the 56–70-year age group (64%), followed by 40–55 years (25%), and only 11% were above 70 years. Females constituted nearly two-thirds of the study population (64.5%), and a substantial proportion of participants were either primary educated (34.3%) or illiterate (32%).

 

Table 2. Clinical Profile Related to Diabetes (n = 172)

Variable

Category

n (%)

Duration of T2DM (years)

<5

50 (29.0)

5–10

56 (32.6)

>10

66 (38.4)

Type of Diabetes Medication

OHA only

96 (55.8)

Insulin only

27 (15.7)

OHA + Insulin

42 (24.4)

None

7 (4.1)

Glycaemic Control

Controlled (HbA1c <7%)

56 (32.6)

Uncontrolled (HbA1c ≥7%)

116 (67.4)

 

Around 38.4% of the participants had diabetes for more than 10 years, and more than half (55.8%) were on oral hypoglycaemic agents alone, while 24.4% required both insulin and OHA. Overall, glycaemic control was poor in the cohort, with 67.4% having uncontrolled HbA1c ≥7%.

 

Table 3. Thyroid Status of Study Participants (n = 172)

Thyroid Status

n (%)

Euthyroid

76 (44.2)

Subclinical Hypothyroidism

56 (32.6)

Subclinical Hyperthyroidism

10 (5.8)

Overt Hypothyroidism

25 (14.5)

Overt Hyperthyroidism

5 (2.9)

 

Subclinical hypothyroidism was the most common thyroid abnormality, affecting 32.6% of participants, followed by overt hypothyroidism (14.5%). Only 44.2% of the population were euthyroid, indicating a high burden of thyroid dysfunction among T2DM patients.

 

Table 4. Association Between Age and Thyroid Dysfunction (n = 172)

Age Group

Subclinical Hypothyroid n (%)

Subclinical Hyperthyroid n (%)

Others (%)

<60 years (n=57)

19 (33.3)

2 (3.5)

36 (63.1)

≥60 years (n=115)

37 (32.2)

8 (7.0)

70 (60.8)

χ² = 3.7, p = 0.43 (NS)

 

Although thyroid dysfunction appeared slightly more frequent in ≥60-year individuals, with 32.2% having subclinical hypothyroidism, the association between age group and thyroid status was statistically insignificant (p = 0.43).

 

Table 5. Gender-wise Distribution of Thyroid Dysfunction (n = 172)

Gender

Subclinical Hypothyroid n (%)

Subclinical Hyperthyroid n (%)

Total n (%)

Female (n=111)

37 (33.3)

2 (1.8)

39 (35.1)

Male (n=61)

19 (31.1)

8 (13.1)

27 (44.3)

χ² = 5.67, p = 0.0173 (Significant)

 

Thyroid dysfunction differed significantly between genders (p = 0.0173). Females predominantly exhibited subclinical hypothyroidism (33.3%), whereas males showed higher rates of subclinical hyperthyroidism (13.1%).

 

Table 6. Association Between Duration of Diabetes and Thyroid Dysfunction (n = 172)

Duration of T2DM

Subclinical Hypothyroid n (%)

Subclinical Hyperthyroid n (%)

Others (%)

<5 years (n=43)

3 (7.0)

4 (9.3)

36 (83.7)

5–10 years (n=56)

19 (30.2)

2 (3.2)

35 (62.6)

≥10 years (n=66)

34 (51.5)

4 (6.1)

28 (42.4)

χ² = 10.75, p = 0.0046 (Significant)

 

A strong association was observed between increasing duration of diabetes and thyroid dysfunction (p = 0.0046). Participants with diabetes ≥10 years had the highest proportion of subclinical hypothyroidism (51.5%), whereas those with <5 years duration showed minimal thyroid abnormalities.

 

Table 7. Glycaemic Control vs Thyroid Status (n = 172)

Thyroid Status

Controlled n (%)

Uncontrolled n (%)

Euthyroid

39 (51.3)

37 (48.7)

Overt Hypothyroid

0 (0)

25 (100)

Subclinical Hypothyroid

6 (10.7)

50 (89.3)

Subclinical Hyperthyroid

5 (50)

5 (50)

χ² = 41.81, p < 0.000001 (Highly Significant)

 

Poor glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7%) was markedly more common among participants with hypothyroid states, particularly overt (100%) and subclinical hypothyroidism (89.3%), demonstrating a highly significant association between glycaemic status and thyroid dysfunction (p < 0.000001).

 

Table 8. Microvascular Complications vs Thyroid Status (n = 172)

Thyroid Status

Microvascular Present n (%)

Absent n (%)

Euthyroid

41 (53.9)

35 (46.1)

Overt Hypothyroid

23 (92.0)

2 (8.0)

Subclinical Hypothyroid

50 (89.3)

6 (10.7)

Subclinical Hyperthyroid

6 (60.0)

4 (40.0)

χ² = 28.59, p < 0.00001 (Significant)

 

Microvascular complications were more prevalent among hypothyroid patients, affecting 92% of overt and 89.3% of subclinical hypothyroid individuals, compared with 53.9% of euthyroid participants. This association was statistically significant (p < 0.00001).

 

Table 9. Macrovascular Complications vs Thyroid Status (n = 172)

Thyroid Status

Macrovascular Present n (%)

Absent n (%)

Euthyroid

30 (39.5)

46 (60.5)

Overt Hypothyroid

21 (84.0)

4 (16.0)

Subclinical Hypothyroid

31 (55.4)

25 (44.6)

Subclinical Hyperthyroid

10 (100)

0 (0)

χ² = 28.22, p = 0.00001 (Significant)

 

Macrovascular complications were also significantly higher in hypothyroid states, particularly overt hypothyroidism (84%) and subclinical hypothyroidism (55.4%). All participants with subclinical hyperthyroidism exhibited macrovascular involvement, indicating a strong association (p = 0.00001).

 

Table 10. Lipid Abnormalities (Dyslipidemia) in Relation to Thyroid Status (n = 172)

Thyroid Status

Dyslipidemia Present n (%)

Dyslipidemia Absent n (%)

Euthyroid

45 (59.2)

31 (40.8)

Subclinical Hypothyroid

50 (89.3)

6 (10.7)

Overt Hypothyroid

25 (100)

0

Subclinical Hyperthyroid

10 (100)

0

χ² = 22.71, p < 0.0001 (Highly Significant)

 

Dyslipidemia prevalence was strikingly higher among those with thyroid dysfunction, affecting 89.3% of subclinical hypothyroid and 100% of overt hypothyroid participants, while only 40.8% of euthyroid individuals had lipid abnormalities, showing a highly significant association (p < 0.0001).

 

Discussion:

In the present study, thyroid dysfunction was observed in 55.8% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with subclinical hypothyroidism being the most common subtype (32.6%). This prevalence is higher than that reported by Han et al. (2015) [13], who found a pooled prevalence of 10.2% among T2DM patients, and also higher than the findings of Kahaly & Frommer (2018) [14], who reported thyroid dysfunction in 28–35% of diabetics. However, our prevalence closely resembles that of Yaseri et al. (2025) [15], who reported thyroid dysfunction in 61.9% of diabetic individuals.

 

A significant association was observed between female gender and thyroid dysfunction in our study, consistent with Jali et al. (2017) [16], who found a significantly higher prevalence of hypothyroidism and subclinical hypothyroidism in diabetic women. We also found that thyroid dysfunction increased with longer duration of diabetes, which aligns with Khandelwal & Tandon (2012) [17], who suggested that chronic metabolic stress and insulin resistance may predispose diabetic patients to thyroid abnormalities.

 

Poor glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7%) was more prominent among those with hypothyroid states, mirroring the findings of Mohamed et al. (2017) [18], who reported worse metabolic control in diabetic patients with thyroid dysfunction. Similarly, the strong association between dyslipidemia and hypothyroid states in our study agrees with Elhussein et al. (2025) [19], who demonstrated that subclinical hypothyroidism significantly worsens lipid profile and increases cardiovascular risk in diabetics.

 

Regarding complications, microvascular and macrovascular complications were more common among patients with hypothyroidism, which is consistent with the meta-analysis by Han et al. (2015) [13], who reported increased risks of nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy in SCH patients. Conversely, some authors such as Chaker et al. (2014) [20] did not find significant differences in complication rates between euthyroid and SCH diabetics, indicating heterogeneity across populations.

 

 

Conclusion

In this study, more than half of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibited thyroid dysfunction, with subclinical hypothyroidism being the most prevalent abnormality. Thyroid dysfunction was significantly associated with female gender, longer duration of diabetes, poor glycaemic control, dyslipidemia, and a higher burden of both microvascular and macrovascular complications. These findings highlight the clinical importance of routinely assessing thyroid function in patients with T2DM, particularly those with uncontrolled diabetes or long-standing disease. Early detection and management of thyroid dysfunction may contribute to improved metabolic control and a reduction in diabetes-related complications.

 

References:

  1. Sapra A, Bhandari P. Diabetes. [Updated 2023 Jun 21]. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551501/
  2. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, 6th edn. 2013, p. 30,34.
  3. American Diabetes Association (ADA): Introduction:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 1 January 2021; 44 (Supplement_1): S1–S2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-Sint
  4. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas,9th Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2019 Nov 1; 157:107843.
  5. Harding JL, Pavkov ME, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Gregg EW. Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia. 2019 Jan;62(1):3-16.
  6. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Groop L, Henry RR, Herman WH, Holst JJ, Hu FB, Kahn CR, Raz I, Shulman GI, Simonson DC. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2015 Jul 23;1(1):1-22.
  7. Duntas LH, Brenta G. A renewed focus on the association between thyroid hormones and lipid metabolism. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2018 Sep 3; 9:511.
  8. Papazafiropoulou A, Sotiropoulos A, Kokolaki A, Kardara M, Stamataki P, Pappas S. Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among greek type 2 diabetic patients attending an outpatient clinic. Journal of clinical medicine research. 2010 Mar 25;2(2):75.
  9. Biondi B, Kahaly GJ, Robertson RP. Thyroid dysfunction and diabetes mellitus: two closely associated disorders. Endocrine reviews. 2019 Jun;40(3):789-824.
  10. Shabnam S, Mallikarjuna CR, Pinjar PM. Study of subclinical hypothyroidism among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research. 2015 Jul 1;4(3):195-8.
  11. Taylor PN, Albrecht D, Scholz A, Gutierrez-Buey G, Lazarus JH, Dayan CM, Okosieme OE. Global epidemiology of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2018 May;14(5):301-16.
  12. Javeedh S, Vidya TA. Study of subclinical thyroid disorders in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2021;8(02):103-107.
  13. Han C, He X, Xia X, Li Y, Shi X, Shan Z, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135233.
  14. Kahaly GJ, Frommer L. Polyglandular autoimmune syndromes in diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(11):874–85.
  15. Yaseri M, Farrokhi S, Hosseini MS, Shafiee A, Abdollahi A. Prevalence and predictors of thyroid dysfunction among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A large observational study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2025;19(1):102–10.
  16. Jali MV, Kambar S, Jali SM, Hiremath MB, Nalawade P. Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a tertiary care hospital, Vijayapura, Karnataka. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):OC36–8.
  17. Khandelwal D, Tandon N. Overt and subclinical hypothyroidism: Who to treat and how. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(2):238–46.
  18. Mohamed GA, El Saied AR, El-Masry SA. Thyroid dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its relation to glycaemic control. Alexandria J Med. 2017;53(3):227–31.
  19. Elhussein AB, Abdalla AI, Hassan MA, Elbashir LF, Fadlelmola HA, Musa IR, et al. Impact of hypothyroidism on lipid profile and cardiovascular risk among patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2025;15:4452.
  20. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1550–62.

 

 

 

Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC, CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS, MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME OF LIVER ABSCESS: A TERTIARY CARE CENTER BASED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 556-562
Original Article Open Access
Impact of Psychiatric Comorbidities On Quality of Life and Disease Severity in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study from India
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 549-555
Original Article Open Access
Coagulation Abnormalities and Prothrombotic Tendency in Paediatric Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: A Case-Control Study from South India
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 2170-2175
Original Article Open Access
Efficacy of Ormeloxifene Versus Norethisterone in Selected Group of Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding – A Comparative Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 530-535
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue-5
Citations
77 Views
33 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved