International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1229-1235
Research Article
Prevalence Of Keratomycosis Among Corneal Ulcer Cases Attending Department of Ophthalmology in A Tertiary Care Hospital at Northern Bihar
 ,
 ,
Received
Sept. 7, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 25, 2025
Published
Oct. 8, 2025
Abstract

Background: Keratomycosis is a major cause of corneal blindness in tropical regions, particularly among rural populations exposed to agricultural trauma. Despite its clinical importance, regional data from Northern Bihar remain limited.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence, etiological profile, and therapeutic outcomes of fungal keratitis among corneal ulcer cases in a tertiary care hospital in Northern Bihar.

Materials and Methods: This analytic-observational cohort study was conducted at Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, over 23 months (June 2023–May 2025). A total of 105 patients with corneal ulcers were evaluated. Corneal scrapings were examined by KOH mount, Gram staining, and culture on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar. Fungal isolates were identified by colony morphology and LPCB mount. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26.

Results: Fungal etiology was confirmed in 42.9% of corneal ulcers. Most patients were 21–40 years old (40%) and male (64.8%), reflecting occupational exposure. Vegetative trauma was the predominant predisposing factor (58.3%). The leading isolates were Aspergillus spp. (55.6%), Fusarium spp. (33.3%), and Candida spp. (11.1%). Bacterial co-infections accounted for 9.5% of cases, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common. Early diagnosis (< 7 days) correlated with better outcomes—66.7% of fungal cases achieved complete healing.

Conclusion: Keratomycosis remains a significant cause of infectious corneal ulceration in Northern Bihar, strongly linked to vegetative trauma and agricultural exposure. Aspergillus species predominate, and early microbiological confirmation with prompt antifungal therapy markedly improves prognosis. Public education on eye protection and early care after ocular injury is essential to reduce preventable blindness in high-risk communities.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Corneal ulcers represent a significant public health concern, particularly in developing countries like India, where they contribute substantially to ocular morbidity and preventable blindness [1]. Among the various etiologies of corneal ulcers, fungal keratitis (keratomycosis) poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its indolent progression, nonspecific clinical features, and limited treatment options [2]. The burden of fungal keratitis is disproportionately high in tropical and subtropical regions, including India, where agricultural activities expose populations to trauma from vegetative matter, a major risk factor for fungal corneal infections [3].

 

In India, fungal pathogens account for 30-50% of microbial keratitis cases, with Fusarium and Aspergillus species being the most commonly isolated organisms [4]. Northern Bihar, with its predominantly agrarian economy and high incidence of ocular trauma, is expected to have a significant prevalence of keratomycosis, though comprehensive regional data remain limited [5]. The clinical presentation of fungal keratitis often mimics bacterial ulcers, leading to delayed diagnosis and inappropriate initial treatment with antibiotics, which may exacerbate the condition [6].

 

Diagnostic challenges further complicate management, as conventional methods like potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet mount and fungal culture have variable sensitivity and often require expertise not readily available in peripheral health centers [7]. Advanced diagnostic tools such as confocal microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while more accurate, are rarely accessible in resource-limited settings like northern Bihar [8]. This diagnostic uncertainty frequently results in delayed initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy, contributing to poor visual outcomes and complications such as corneal perforation or endophthalmitis[9].

 

The treatment landscape for fungal keratitis remains challenging, with topical natamycin and amphotericin B being the mainstay of therapy despite their limited availability in many healthcare facilities[10]. The rising costs of antifungals and emerging drug resistance further complicate management, underscoring the need for region-specific epidemiological data to guide clinical practice and resource allocation[11]. This study aims to determine the prevalence of keratomycosis among corneal ulcer patients attending a tertiary care hospital in northern Bihar, identify common fungal isolates, and assess current diagnostic and treatment practices.

 

By providing crucial insights into the local epidemiology of fungal keratitis, this study will help inform better clinical management strategies and highlight gaps in healthcare delivery that need to be addressed to reduce corneal blindness in this high-risk population. The findings may also serve as a basis for advocating improved diagnostic facilities and ensuring consistent availability of essential antifungal medications in the region.

 

Objective

To determine the prevalence of fungal colonization in cases of corneal ulcer following trauma by performing microscopic and culture identification of etiological agents and assessing their clinical response to topical antifungal therapy.

 

Materials & Methods:

Study Design: The present study was designed as an analytic–observational cohort study conducted in the Department of Microbiology in collaboration with the Department of Ophthalmology, Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College and L.S.K. Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar.

 

Study Period: The study was carried out over a period of 23 months (June 2023 to May 2025).

Sampling Technique: Judicious corneal scrapings were obtained from the ulcer bed and margins by an ophthalmologist under aseptic precautions. The samples were immediately processed at the collection point by a microbiologist to minimize contamination and delay. Clinically suspected cases of keratomycosis were referred to the Department of Microbiology for etiological diagnosis.

 

Sample Size Determination: Mycotic keratitis is recognized as one of the major causes of infectious keratitis, with a worldwide prevalence ranging from 17% to 36%. The regional prevalence of corneal ulcers in Northern India is reported to be 7.3% according to Gopinathan et al. (2002).[12] the calculated sample size was 105


Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients attending the Ophthalmology Department of MGMMC & LSK Hospital with corneal ulcers during the study period, with or without a known history of ocular trauma, irrespective of age or gender.
  • Patients who provided written informed consent.

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cases previously treated with topical antifungal medication.
  • Patients unable or unwilling to cooperate during sample collection.
  • Very small ulcers yielding insufficient material for microbiological examination.
  • Absence of informed consent.

 

Sample Collection and Clinical Procedure

After instillation of topical anesthetic drops (proparacaine 0.5%), corneal scrapings were aseptically obtained from the ulcer bed and margins using a sterile disposable 15-0 surgical blade. Care was taken to avoid corneal perforation or bleeding during the procedure.

 

Microbiological Work-Up

A portion of the scraped material was immediately transferred to a clean glass slide with a drop of 10% KOH for rapid microscopic examination of fungal filaments or yeast cells. The slide was either examined promptly or kept in a moist chamber until evaluation.

Residual material on the blade was inoculated onto Blood Agar and Sabouraud Dextrose Chloramphenicol Agar (SDCA) in McCartney bottles. Bacterial and fungal cultures were incubated at appropriate temperatures (25 °C and 37 °C) and observed daily for growth. When fungal colonies developed, identification up to the genus level was carried out by colony morphology and Lactophenol Cotton Blue (LPCB) mount microscopy.

 

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach

Preliminary KOH microscopy results were communicated to the treating ophthalmologist within one hour, enabling early initiation of antifungal therapy regardless of the species identification.
In cases with inconclusive microscopy (approximately 16%), empirical combined topical antibacterial and antifungal therapy was initiated considering the history and type of ocular trauma.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was not included, as antifungal susceptibility testing remains non-standardized for routine clinical use.

 

Outcome Assessment

Therapeutic success was defined as complete corneal re-epithelialization observed on slit-lamp examination. However, visual recovery was evaluated over a longer follow-up period, as scarring in fungal keratitis may persist. All clinical data and treatment outcomes were systematically recorded in patient case sheets and reviewed periodically during the study.

 

Statistical Analysis

All collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2021 and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables such as prevalence and fungal species distribution were expressed as frequency and percentage, while continuous variables (e.g., age) were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

 

Ethical Considerations

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College & L.S.K. Hospital, Kishanganj, prior to commencement.
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants (or legal guardians for minors/incapacitated patients) after explaining the study objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits in the participant’s local language (Hindi or Bengali). Confidentiality was ensured, and participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without affecting their medical care.

 

Results & Analysis:

Table 1: Age Distribution of Corneal Ulcer Patients (n=105)

Age Group (Years)

Number of Cases

Percentage (%)

18 - 20

18

17.1

21–40

42

40.0

41–60

30

28.6

>60

15

14.3

Total

105

100.0

 

The majority of patients belonged to the 21–40 years age group (40.0%), followed by 41–60 years (28.6%). Younger (18 - 20 years) and elderly (>60 years) patients accounted for 17.1% and 14.3%, respectively.

 

Table 2: Sex Distribution of Corneal Ulcer Patients (n=105)

Sex

Number of Cases

Percentage (%)

Male

68

64.8

Female

37

35.2

Total

105

100.0

A male predominance (64.8%) was observed, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.8:1.

 

Table 3: Prevalence of Fungal Colonization in Traumatized Corneas (n=105)

Parameter

Total Cases

Fungal Culture Positive (n=45)

Percentage (%)

History of Trauma

105

45

42.9

Vegetative Trauma

60

35

58.3

Non-Vegetative Trauma

25

7

28.0

No Trauma History

20

3

15.0

In the present study, out of a total of 105 corneal ulcer cases, 45 (42.9%) were found to be fungal culture positive. Among these, a significant number had a history of trauma. Specifically, 60 patients had a history of vegetative trauma, of which 35 (58.3%) tested positive for fungal infection. In contrast, among the 25 patients with non-vegetative trauma, only 7 (28.0%) were culture positive. Notably, even among the 20 patients who reported no history of trauma, 3 (15.0%) showed fungal growth

 

Table:4. Prevalence of Keratomycosis Cases

Parameter

Number of Cases (n=105)

Percentage (%)

Total Keratomycosis Cases

45

42.9

Fungal Hyphae (Microscopy)

45

42.9

Bacterial Organisms

35

33.3

Mixed Infections

10

9.5

No Organisms Detected

15

14.3

Total

105

100.0

     

 

A total of 105 cases were studied, out of which 42.9% were diagnosed with keratomycosis, and 33.3% had bacterial infections. Mixed infections accounted for 9.5%, while 14.3% showed no organisms detected.

 

Table: 5. Fungal Isolates (n=45)

Fungal Isolates

No of Cases

Percentage

Aspergillus spp.

25

55.6

Fusarium spp.

15

33.3

Candida spp.

5

11.1

- Other Fungi

0

0.0

Total

45

100.0

 

Among the 45 fungal isolates, 55.6% were identified as Aspergillus spp., followed by 33.3% of Fusarium spp., and 11.1% as Candida spp. There were no other fungi isolated.

 

Table: 6. Bacterial Isolates (n=35)

Bacterial Isolates

No of acses

Percentage

Staphylococcus aureus

20

57.1

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

10

28.6

Streptococcus pneumoniae

5

14.3

- Other Bacteria

0

0.0

Total

35

100.0

 

Of the 35 bacterial isolates, Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent, accounting for 57.1%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in 28.6% of cases, and Streptococcus pneumoniae accounted for 14.3%. No other bacterial organisms were detected.

 

Table: 7. Response to Anti-Fungal Therapy (n=45)

Response to Anti-Fungal Therapy

No of cases

Percentage

- Complete Healing

30

66.7

- Partial Healing

10

22.2

- No Response

5

11.1

Total

45

100.0

 

The majority of the cases (66.7%) showed complete healing with anti-fungal therapy. Partial healing was observed in 22.2% of the cases, while 11.1% of the cases showed no response to the therapy.

 

Table 8: Association Between Trauma Type and Microbial Isolates (n=105)

Trauma Type

Fungal Positivity (n=45)

Bacterial Positivity (n=35)

Mixed Infections (n=10)

Vegetative Trauma

35 (77.8%)

12 (34.3%)

8 (80.0%)

Non-Vegetative Trauma

7 (15.6%)

18 (51.4%)

2 (20.0%)

No Trauma

3 (6.6%)

5 (14.3%)

0 (0.0%)

Among the 45 fungal-positive cases, the majority (77.8%) had a history of vegetative trauma, highlighting it as a significant risk factor for keratomycosis. In comparison, 15.6% of fungal infections were associated with non-vegetative trauma, while only 6.6% occurred in patients without any history of trauma. On the other hand, bacterial infections (n=35) were more commonly linked to non-vegetative trauma, accounting for 51.4% of cases, followed by 34.3% with vegetative trauma and 14.3% without trauma. Mixed infections (n=10) were predominantly seen in patients with vegetative trauma (80.0%), whereas 20.0% occurred in those with non-vegetative trauma, and none were observed among patients without any trauma history. These findings reinforce the association between trauma—particularly of vegetative origin—and the development of fungal and mixed microbial keratitis.

 

Table 9: Time-to-Diagnosis and Therapeutic Outcomes (n=45)

Time from Symptom Onset to Diagnosis

Complete Healing (n=30)

Partial/No Healing (n=15)

<7 days

22 (73.3%)

5 (33.3%)

7–14 days

7 (23.3%)

6 (40.0%)

>14 days

1 (3.4%)

4 (26.7%)

 

In this study, the timing of diagnosis from symptom onset was found to significantly influence healing outcomes. Among the 30 cases that achieved complete healing, a majority (73.3%) were diagnosed within 7 days of symptom onset. In contrast, only 33.3% of the 15 cases with partial or no healing were diagnosed within the first 7 days. Delayed diagnosis was associated with poorer outcomes; 40.0% of cases with partial or no healing were diagnosed between 7–14 days, and 26.7% were diagnosed after more than 14 days. In comparison, only 23.3% and 3.4% of completely healed cases were diagnosed within these respective timeframes.

 

Table 10: Ulcer Characteristics vs. Microbial Etiology

Ulcer Feature

Fungal (n=45)

Bacterial (n=35)

Mixed (n=10)

Size >3mm

38 (84.4%)

20 (57.1%)

9 (90.0%)

Hypopyon Present

28 (62.2%)

15 (42.9%)

7 (70.0%)

Central Location

32 (71.1%)

18 (51.4%)

8 (80.0%)

 

Analysis of clinical features revealed that larger ulcer size, hypopyon, and central corneal involvement were more commonly associated with fungal and mixed infections compared to bacterial ulcers. Among fungal cases (n=45), 84.4% had ulcers larger than 3 mm, 62.2% presented with hypopyon, and 71.1% had centrally located ulcers. In comparison, bacterial infections (n=35) showed a smaller proportion with these features: 57.1% had ulcers >3 mm, 42.9% had hypopyon, and 51.4% had central ulcer location. Mixed infections (n=10) showed the most aggressive presentation, with 90.0% of cases having ulcer size >3 mm, 70.0% presenting with hypopyon, and 80.0% exhibiting central corneal involvement.

 

Table 11: Antifungal Treatment Response by Fungal Species (n=45)

Fungal Isolate

Complete Healing

Partial Healing

No Response

Aspergillus spp.

18/25 (72.0%)

5/25 (20.0%)

2/25 (8.0%)

Fusarium spp.

9/15 (60.0%)

4/15 (26.7%)

2/15 (13.3%)

Candida spp.

3/5 (60.0%)

1/5 (20.0%)

1/5 (20.0%)

 

The treatment outcomes varied among different fungal isolates in keratomycosis cases. Aspergillus spp. demonstrated the highest rate of complete healing, with 72.0% (18 out of 25 cases) showing full recovery, followed by 20.0% showing partial healing and 8.0% showing no response. Among the Fusarium spp. infections, 60.0% (9 out of 15 cases) achieved complete healing, while 26.7% had partial healing and 13.3% showed no response. Similarly, Candida spp. infections resulted in complete healing in 60.0% (3 out of 5 cases), with 20.0% each showing partial healing and no response.

 

Discussion:

This analytic-observational cohort study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kishanganj, Bihar, evaluated the prevalence and etiological profile of keratomycosis among patients with corneal ulcers. The study identified fungal etiology in 42.9% of cases, confirming that fungal keratitis remains a major public-health concern in agrarian regions.

Most patients were between 21–40 years (40%), indicating higher risk among active, outdoor workers. The male predominance (M:F = 1.8:1) parallels reports by Srinivasan et al. (1997)[13] and Chander et al. (1994)[14], linking occupational exposure and ocular trauma with fungal keratitis.

 

Trauma, particularly with vegetative material (58.3%), emerged as the leading predisposing factor, consistent with Nalamada et al. (2024)[15], who found 54–64% of fungal ulcers associated with agricultural injuries. Even 15% of non-traumatic ulcers yielded fungal growth, suggesting unrecognized micro-injuries or delayed presentation.

 

Aspergillus spp. (55.6%) and Fusarium spp. (33.3%) predominated—comparable to Usha et al. (2012)[93] and Idiculla et al. (2009)[16]. The relatively lower proportion of Candida spp. (11.1%) concurs with Baruah et al. (2020)[17], reflecting the rarity of yeast infections in rural, outdoor populations. Among bacterial isolates, Staphylococcus aureus (57.1%) was most frequent, aligning with Gram-positive predominance noted by Baruah et al. (2020)[17].

 

Mixed fungal–bacterial infections (9.5%) were also identified, similar to the 9.29% global incidence reported by Ahmadikia et al. (2021)[18], underscoring the need for dual antimicrobial coverage in trauma-related corneal ulcers.

Fungal and mixed ulcers displayed more severe features—larger size, hypopyon, and central location—compared with bacterial ulcers, consistent with the observations of Nalamada et al. (2024)[15]. Early diagnosis significantly improved prognosis: 73.3% of completely healed cases were diagnosed within seven days, echoing Brown et al. (2021)[19], who emphasized early intervention as key to vision preservation.

 

Overall, 66.7% of patients responded completely to antifungal therapy, comparable to success rates reported by Idiculla et al. (2009)[16]. Aspergillus infections showed the best response (72%), while Fusarium infections were more resistant (13.3% non-responsive), consistent with Awad et al. (2024)[20].

 

Conclusion:

Keratomycosis was identified in 42.9% of corneal ulcer cases, predominantly affecting young male adults engaged in agricultural work. Vegetative trauma emerged as the main risk factor, with Aspergillus spp. being the most common isolate, followed by Fusarium and Candida. Fungal ulcers were typically larger, centrally located, and more severe than bacterial ones. Early diagnosis within seven days was strongly associated with better outcomes, with 66.7% showing complete healing. The study underscores the need for prompt diagnosis, early antifungal therapy, and public awareness on eye protection to reduce the burden of fungal keratitis in rural Bihar.

 

REFERENCES:

  1. Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):214-21.
  2. Thomas PA, Kaliamurthy J. Mycotic keratitis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(2):610-24.
  3. Brown L, Leck AK, Gichangi M, et al. The global incidence and diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(3):e49-e57.
  4. Garg P, Roy A, Roy S. Update on fungal keratitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27(4):333-9.
  5. Sahay P, Singhal D, Nagpal R, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of fungal keratitis in Bihar, India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(8):1698-704.
  6. Dalmon C, Porco TC, Lietman TM, et al. The clinical differentiation of bacterial and fungal keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(4):1787-91.
  7. Sharma S, Das S, Virdi A, et al. Re-appraisal of topical antifungals in fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(9):1190-5.
  8. Vaddavalli PK, Garg P, Sharma S, et al. Role of confocal microscopy in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(1):29-35.
  9. Prajna NV, Mascarenhas J, Krishnan T, et al. Comparison of natamycin and voriconazole for fungal keratitis. N Engl J Med. 2020;387(25):2335-44.
  10. Xie L, Zhai H, Shi W. Penetrating keratoplasty for fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(1):33-6.
  11. Lalitha P, Prajna NV, Kabra A, et al. Risk factors for treatment outcome in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(4):526-30.
  12. Gopinathan U, Garg P, Fernandez M, Sharma S, Athmanathan S, Rao GN. The epidemiological features and laboratory results of fungal keratitis: a 10 year review at a referral eye care centre in South India. Cornea. 2002;21:555–59.
  13. Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C, Cevallos V, Mascarenhas JM, Asokan B, Wilkins J, Smolin G, Whitcher JP. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov 1;81(11):965-71.
  14. Chander J, Sharma A. Prevalence of fungal corneal ulcers in northern India. Infection. 1994 May;22(3):207-9.
  15. Nalamada S, Shahanaz S, Mukhtar SN. Study of Keratomycosis at A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Res. J. Med. Sci. 2024 Jul 5;18:29-33.
  16. Idiculla T, Zachariah G, Keshav B, Basu S. A retrospective study of fungal corneal ulcers in the South sharqiyah region in oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2009 Apr;9(1):59-62. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
  17. Baruah, M., Das, R. K., Agarwalla, V., & Basyach, P. (2020). Corneal ulcer: an epidemiological, microbiological and clinical study of cases attending Assam medical college and hospital, Dibrugarh, India. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences8(3), 1076–1080.
  18. Ahmadikia K, Aghaei Gharehbolagh S, Fallah B, Naeimi Eshkaleti M, Malekifar P, Rahsepar S, Getso MI, Sharma S, Mahmoudi S. Distribution, prevalence, and causative agents of fungal keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis (1990 to 2020). Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2021 Aug 26;11:698780.
  19. Brown L, Leck AK, Gichangi M, Burton MJ, Denning DW. The global incidence and diagnosis of fungal keratitis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021 Mar 1;21(3):e49-57.
  20. Awad AB. Exploring the bearing of liquidity risk in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) banks. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2024 Dec 31;12(1):2330840.

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Psoriasis and Its Association with Metabolic Syndrome
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1110-1114
Research Article Open Access
An Investigation into Pre-Eclampsia Awareness and the Implementation of an Educational Initiative for Expectant Mothers at the Primary Health Center in Kirumampakkam, Puducherry
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1061-1070
Research Article Open Access
A Study On Methylene Blue Guided Surgical Debridement Of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1269-1274
Research Article Open Access
Functional And Surgical Outcome of Distal Third Shaft Fracture of Femur Treated with Distal Femoral Intramedullary Locking Nail (DFN), An Observational Prospective Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1245-1255
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue-5
Citations
9 Views
4 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright IJMPR | All Rights Reserved