International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 2110-2115
Original Article
Pre-Operative Prediction of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Clinical Assessment and Ultrasonographic Parameters
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Oct. 28, 2025
Accepted
Nov. 29, 2025
Published
Dec. 31, 2025
Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for symptomatic cholelithiasis, offering advantages in recovery and postoperative outcomes. However, technical difficulty varies, especially in patients with specific clinical and ultrasonographic risk factors. To evaluate preoperative predictors of difficult LC using clinical and ultrasonographic parameters, facilitate risk stratification, and improve surgical safety and perioperative outcomes. This prospective cross-sectional study included 86 adult patients with clinically and ultrasonographically confirmed cholelithiasis scheduled for elective LC at Parul Sevashram Hospital, Vadodara. Detailed clinical histories, laboratory tests, and optimized preoperative assessment—including ultrasonography for gallbladder wall thickness, impacted stones, and pericholecystic fluid—were performed. Standard four-port LC was conducted; intraoperative findings and surgical difficulty were recorded and analyzed. The majority of participants were middle-aged females with a high prevalence of comorbidities and overweight BMI. Common risk factors included gallbladder wall thickening (38.4%), prior hospitalization for acute cholecystitis (37.2%), and impacted stones (32.6%). Difficult surgeries accounted for 60.5% of cases, with a mean operative duration of 77.4 minutes. Statistical analysis revealed that high-risk category, advanced age, previous cholecystitis, wall thickening, and impacted stones were significantly associated with increased intraoperative difficulty. Comprehensive preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation is instrumental in predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Identifying high-risk patients allows for improved surgical planning, resource allocation, and patient counseling, ultimately reducing perioperative complications and enhancing clinical outcomes.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has emerged as the gold standard for treating symptomatic cholelithiasis and related gallbladder disorders, offering distinct advantages over open surgery such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, early return to normal activity, and superior cosmetic outcomes. (1,2) Cholelithiasis, one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal morbidity, affects about 4–6% of the Indian population, with higher prevalence among middle-aged women in northern regions. (3,4) Although LC is routinely performed, the procedure can be technically demanding in cases with severe inflammation, adhesions, or altered anatomy, resulting in complications or conversion to open cholecystectomy in 2–15% of cases. (5,6)

 

Predicting a difficult LC preoperatively is crucial for effective surgical planning, better resource utilization, and improved patient counseling. (7) Clinical factors such as advanced age, male gender, obesity, history of cholecystitis, prior upper abdominal surgery, and comorbidities like diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increase operative complexity.  (8,9) Ultrasonographic parameters including thickened gallbladder wall, contracted gallbladder, pericholecystic fluid, impacted stones, and dilated common bile duct also correlate with surgical difficulty. (10,11) This study aims to evaluate clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of difficult LC to facilitate risk stratification, enhance operative safety, and improve perioperative outcomes.

 

OBJECTIVE

To enhance the safety of the procedure by identifying potential preoperative risk factors, thereby aiding in better surgical planning, minimizing intraoperative complications, and reducing postoperative morbidity for patients.

 

METHODOLOGY

The study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Parul Sevashram Hospital, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (PIMSR), Vadodara, Gujarat, after obtaining approval from the Parul University Institutional Ethics Committee for Human Research (PUIECHR). 

 

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged above 18 years.
  • Clinically and ultrasonographically diagnosed cases of cholelithiasis.
  • Patients planned for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

 

Preoperative Optimization

  • Detailed clinical history and physical examination.
  • Routine investigations including complete hemogram, liver function tests, and PT/INR.
  • Ultrasonography abdomen and pelvis to assess gallbladder wall thickness, stones, and pericholecystic fluid.
  • Chest X-ray (PA view) and ECG for anesthetic fitness.
  • Optimization of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or COPD before surgery.
  • Informed written consent obtained after explaining the procedure, risks, and possible conversion to open surgery.

 

Surgical Technique

  • Standard four-port antegrade laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed under general anesthesia.
  • Ports placed as follows: one umbilical (camera), one epigastric (dissection), and two in the right upper quadrant (working ports).
  • Dissection of Calot’s triangle to identify and clip the cystic duct and artery.
  • Gallbladder separated from the liver bed using monopolar cautery.
  • Specimen retrieved via the umbilical port with a retrieval bag.
  • Conversion to open cholecystectomy done in case of dense adhesions, excessive bleeding, or unclear anatomy.

 

RESULT

Table 1: Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Parameter

Category

Frequency (n=86)

Percentage (%)

Age

31–50 years

36

41.9

 

51–70 years

32

37.2

Gender

Female

45

52.3

 

Male

41

47.7

Occupation

Housewife

35

40.7

 

Employed/Job

17

19.8

 

Farmer

12

14.0

Comorbidities

Present

30

34.9

 

Absent

56

65.1

BMI Group

Normal

48

55.8

 

Overweight

38

44.2


This table captures demographic profiles including age, gender, underlying comorbidities, and major occupation groups of the study participants. Most patients were middle-aged, with a slight female majority and a high proportion of housewives. Over a third had medical comorbidities, and nearly half were overweight.

 

 

Table 2: Key Preoperative and Clinical Findings

Parameter

Present

Percentage (%)

Absent

Percentage (%)

Gallbladder wall thickening

33

38.4

53

61.6

Pericholecystic collection

10

11.6

76

88.4

Impacted gallstone

28

32.6

58

67.4

Palpable gallbladder

28

32.6

58

67.4

Acute cholecystitis history

32

37.2

54

62.8


This table summarizes the distribution of key imaging and clinical risk factors in patients before surgery. Wall thickening, impacted stones, and prior hospitalizations for acute cholecystitis were common findings linked to intraoperative challenges.

 

Table 3: Intraoperative Assessment and Surgical Difficulty

Parameter

Category

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Duration of surgery

<60 minutes

29

33.7

 

60–120 minutes

52

60.5

 

>120 minutes

5

5.8

Surgical Difficulty

Easy

29

33.7

 

Difficult

52

60.5

 

Very Difficult

5

5.8


This table presents perioperative performance metrics, highlighting that the majority of surgeries were categorized as 'difficult' and spanned 60–120 minutes in duration.

 

Chart 1: Distribution of Surgery Difficulty Levels

Distribution of Surgery Difficulty Levels among Study Participants

 

This column chart displays the proportion of easy, difficult, and very difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies, emphasizing that the 'difficult' category formed the largest share.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chart 2: Association Between Risk Category and Surgical Difficulty Levels

Association Between Risk Category and Surgical Difficulty Levels

 

This chart visualizes the strong correlation between preoperative risk categories and surgery difficulty level, with high-risk patients much more likely to experience very difficult procedures.

 

DISCUSSION

This prospective cross-sectional study analyzed 86 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis, presenting key epidemiological, clinical, and operative trends consistent with national and international literature. The mean age of the cohort was 48.8 ± 15.16 years, with the majority (79.1%) falling between 31 and 70 years—a distribution closely matched by findings from Patel AM (2022) (12) and Parihar VK (2023), (13) who also reported a high prevalence in middle-aged adults, underscoring the disease’s frequency in this demographic.

 

Distribution of Surgery Difficulty Levels among Study Participants

Gender-wise, a slight female predominance (52.3%) was noted, which aligns with reports by Bansal A et al. (2014) (14) and MedResearch (2019) (15) that consistently document higher rates of cholelithiasis among women, possibly due to hormonal or metabolic factors. The female-to-male ratio in this study (1:0.91) is comparable to ratios observed in previous studies, confirming persistent gender trends.

 

Association Between Risk Category and Surgical Difficulty Levels

Comorbidity profiles revealed that a significant portion (34.9%) of patients had associated conditions, such as diabetes or hypertension. This is in line with reports by Memon J et al. (2021) (16)—who found similar rates of comorbid diabetes/hypertension—and Baddam A et al. (2023), (17) who demonstrated an even higher overall comorbidity burden in their sample. The presence of comorbidities can complicate perioperative management, emphasizing the need for thorough pre-surgical optimization.

 

Body mass index (BMI) assessment revealed no underweight or obese patients, with 55.8% having normal BMI and 44.2% classified as overweight. This supports the findings of Malik et al. (2020) (18), Bansal et al., and Sumit et al. (2024) (19), all of whom reported higher-than-average BMI categories among cholelithiasis patients. Elevated BMI may increase the risk for gallstone formation and influence surgical complexity.

 

Preoperative clinical and ultrasound findings were commonly positive for risk markers: thickened gallbladder wall (38.4%, higher than Chakraborty C (2024) (20)and Panneerselvam P (2024)) (21), impacted stones (32.6%), and prior history of hospitalization for acute cholecystitis (37.2%). Comparative studies report similar but slightly lower rates for these findings, confirming their utility as predictors for intraoperative difficulty.

 

Operative duration most frequently ranged from 60–120 minutes (60.5% of cases), with a mean of 77.4 ± 22.7 minutes—comparable to studies by Chandra Nath H (2021) (22) and Parmar AK (2012) (23), which note a similar spread of operative times in comparable settings. Longer operative time often reflected increased difficulty or perioperative complications.

 

Risk stratification using combined clinical and ultrasonographic parameters proved highly predictive of operative challenge: patients in the high-risk group experienced 'very difficult' surgeries in 71.4% of cases, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). These results reinforce the value of preoperative scoring systems proposed by Khetan AK (2017) (24) and Trehan et al. (2023) (25), both of whom validated the correlation between risk scores and surgical outcomes. Our findings further established that advanced age, prior cholecystitis hospitalization, gallbladder wall thickening, and impacted stones—when present—significantly increased difficulty level and operative risk (p < 0.001).

Overall, the study confirms established risk associations and highlights the importance of comprehensive preoperative evaluation in predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, facilitating better operative planning and improving patient outcomes.

 

CONCLUSION

In this study, the majority of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were middle-aged females, with significant clinical and ultrasonographic risk factors such as gallbladder wall thickening, history of acute cholecystitis, and impacted stones frequently present. Most procedures were classified as difficult, and statistical analysis demonstrated that high preoperative risk scores, advanced age, history of hospitalization for acute cholecystitis, thickened gallbladder wall, and impacted stones were significantly associated with increased intraoperative difficulty. These findings highlight the value of thorough preoperative assessment in identifying patients at higher risk for complex surgery, enabling better operative planning and potentially reducing perioperative morbidity.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Nano M. A brief history of laparoscopy. G Chir. 2012;33(3):53–7.
  2. McMahon AJ, Baxter JN, Anderson JR, Ramsay G, O’Dwyer PJ, Russell IT, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1994;343(8890):135–8.
  3. Livingston EH, Rege R V. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188(3):205–11.
  4. Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M. A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;181(6):520–5.
  5. Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):981–96.
  6. Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Sapru S. Prevalence of biliary tract disease in India: A sonographic study in adult population in Kashmir. Gut. 1989;30(2):201–5.
  7. Costantini R, Caldaralo F, Palmieri C, Napolitano L, Aceto L, Cellini C, et al. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Ital Chir. 2012;83(3):245–52.
  8. Gupta N, Ranjan G, Arora MP, Goswami B, Chaudhary P, Kapur A, et al. Validation of a scoring system to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2013;11(9):1002–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.037
  9. 9Hu ASY, Menon R, Gunnarsson R, de Costa A. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery – A systematic literature review of 30 studies. Am J Surg [Internet]. 2017;214(5):920–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.029
  10. Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2011;14(4):476–83.
  11. Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Tripsianis G, Karayiannakis AJ. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2005;19(7):905–9.
  12. Patel AM, Yeola M, Mahakalkar C. Demographic and Risk Factor Profile in Patients of Gallstone Disease in Central India. 2022;14(5).
  13. Parihar DV kumar. A prospective study on histopathological spectrum of various gall bladder lesions at a tertiary care centre. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2023(10).
  14. Arpit Bansal MA. A clinical Study: Prevalence and management of cholelithiasis. Int Surg J. 2014;1(3):134–9.
  15. Saxena PK, Golandaj VK, Malviya VK. Epidemiological study in operated patients with cholelithiasis and analysis of risk factors. 2019;5(5):340–5.
  16. District J, Shuvo S Das, Hossen T. Prevalence of comorbidities and its associated factors among type- ­ 2 diabetes patients : a hospital- ­ based study in. 2023;
  17. Baddam A, Akuma O, Raj R, Akuma CM, Augustine SW, Hanafi S, et al. Analysis of Risk Factors for Cholelithiasis : A Single-Center Retrospective Study. 2023;15(9).
  18. Malik P, Singla D, Garg MK, Sangwan M. Association of Body Mass Index and Waist to Hip Ratio With Gallstone Disease in Patients Visiting Rural Tertiary Care Center in North India. Surg Innov. 2021;28(1):48–52.
  19. Mishra S, Ranjan A, Sinha CM. To Determine the Correlation between Cholelithiasis and Body Mass Index ( BMI ) and Waist-To-Hip Ratio. 2024;16(4):632–7.
  20. Chakraborty M, Charan S, Pathania S, Dokania MK, Jain A, Pattar J. Correlation of Preoperative Ultrasound Findings in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : A Retrospective Study. 2024;(August):11–4.
  21. Panneerselvam P, Madhivannan S. Association of pre-operative USG findings with intra- operative difficulties among patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 2024;6(1):6–11.
  22. Nath HC, Karunendra K, Singh P, Das R. A Comparative Study between Early and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculus Cholecystitis in North East India. 2024;16(9):929–32.
  23. Parmar AK, Khandelwal RG, Mathew MJ, Reddy PK. Laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy : A retrospective study of 40 cases. 2013;6:96–9.
  24. Khetan AK, Yeola M. Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a scoring system. 2017;4(10):3388–91.
  25. Trehan M, Mangotra V, Singh J. Evaluation of Preoperative Scoring System for Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 2023;(Lc).

 

 

 

Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
The clinical efficacy of PRP injection in Tennis elbow: Is it worth the hype?
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 75-79
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18188418
Original Article Open Access
EVALUATION OF THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF PIPERINE AND 5-FLUOROURACIL ON MG-63 OSTEOSARCOMA CELL LINES AN IN – VITRO STUDY
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 93-98
Original Article Open Access
Outcomes of Primary PCI With Thrombus Aspiration Versus No Aspiration in Patients Presenting With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): A Comparative Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 99-103
Original Article Open Access
Intra-Operative Surgical Difficulties in Women with Previous Two or More Cesarean Sections: A Prospective Observational Study from A Tertiary Care Centre
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 88-92
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue 6
Citations
12 Views
29 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved