International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 2139-2141
Original Article
PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN TWIN PREGNANCIES: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE
 ,
 ,
Received
July 2, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 15, 2025
Published
Oct. 25, 2025
Abstract

Background: Twin pregnancies are associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared to singleton gestations. Prematurity, low birth weight, and early neonatal complications contribute substantially to perinatal morbidity and mortality in twins, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Objectives: To evaluate perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with special reference to fetal outcomes, neonatal mortality, and causes of early neonatal deaths.

Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care centre. Pregnant women with twin gestations beyond the age of viability were enrolled. Perinatal outcomes of all neonates were assessed. Fetal outcomes, neonatal mortality, and causes of early neonatal deaths were analysed. Data were expressed as frequencies and percentages.

Results: A total of 200 neonates born from twin pregnancies were studied. Low birth weight was observed in 132 neonates (66%), of whom 44 (22%) were very low birth weight. Only 24 neonates (12%) had a birth weight greater than 2500 g. Stillbirths accounted for 16 cases (8%). Early neonatal deaths were recorded in 22 neonates, resulting in an early neonatal mortality rate of 11%. Respiratory distress syndrome was the leading cause of early neonatal deaths (59.09%), followed by birth asphyxia (22.7%) and neonatal sepsis (18.18%).

Conclusion: Twin pregnancies are associated with high rates of low birth weight, stillbirths, and early neonatal mortality. Prematurity-related complications remain the leading contributors to adverse perinatal outcomes. Strengthening antenatal surveillance and improving neonatal care services are essential to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Twin pregnancies represent a distinct high-risk obstetric group owing to their strong association with adverse perinatal outcomes. Although twins constitute a small proportion of total births, they contribute disproportionately to perinatal morbidity and mortality [1]. The increased risk is largely attributed to prematurity, low birth weight, placental insufficiency, and intrapartum complications [2].

 

Globally, the incidence of twin pregnancies has increased over recent decades, mainly due to delayed childbearing and the widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies [3]. Despite advances in antenatal care and neonatal intensive care, perinatal outcomes in twin gestations continue to be inferior compared to singleton pregnancies, particularly in resource-limited settings [4].

 

Low birth weight is one of the most consistent adverse outcomes associated with twin pregnancies. Studies have shown that more than half of twins are born weighing less than 2500 g, significantly increasing their risk of respiratory distress, sepsis, and early neonatal death [5,6]. Prematurity further compounds these risks, making the early neonatal period especially critical for survival [7].

 

Perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies is reported to be three to five times higher than in singleton gestations [8]. Stillbirths and early neonatal deaths contribute substantially to this burden. In developing countries, delayed referrals, limited antenatal surveillance, and inadequate neonatal intensive care facilities further worsen outcomes [9].

 

Institution-based studies provide valuable insight into local patterns of perinatal morbidity and mortality and help identify priority areas for intervention. The present study was undertaken to evaluate perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies at a tertiary care centre, with a focus on fetal outcomes, neonatal mortality, and causes of early neonatal deaths.

 

OBJECTIVE

To assess perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies at a tertiary care centre, with particular emphasis on fetal outcomes, neonatal mortality, and causes of early neonatal deaths.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, Government Medical College & J.K. Lon Hospital, Kota, Rajasthan. Pregnant women with confirmed twin gestations beyond the age of viability were included in the study after informed consent. Neonatal outcome data were recorded using a structured proforma. Perinatal outcomes of all neonates were assessed. Fetal outcomes, neonatal mortality, and causes of early neonatal deaths were analysed. Data were analysed descriptively and expressed as frequencies and percentages.

 

RESULTS

Among the 200 neonates born from twin pregnancies, low birth weight (<2500 g) was observed in 132 cases (66%). Of these, 44 neonates (22%) were classified as very low birth weight. Only 24 neonates (12%) had a birth weight greater than 2500 g. 34 (17%) were admitted in NICU for various reasons.

 

Out of the total 200 neonates, 38 (19%) perinatal deaths were recorded. Stillbirths were recorded in 16 cases (8%). Early neonatal deaths occurred in 22 neonates, resulting in an early neonatal mortality rate of 11%. All neonatal deaths were confined to the early neonatal period.

 

Respiratory distress syndrome was the leading cause of early neonatal deaths, accounting for 13 cases (59.09%). Birth asphyxia was responsible for 5 deaths (22.7%), while neonatal sepsis accounted for 4 deaths (18.18%).

 

Table 1: Fetal outcomes of twin preganacies

Fetal outcome

No. of cases (N=200)

%

Birth weight>2500grams

24

12

LBW 1500-2500grams

132

66

VLBW <1500grams

44

22

NICU Admission

34

17

Perinatal death

38

19

 

Table 2: Perinatal mortality in twin pregancies

Perinatal mortality

No. of cases (N=200)

%

Still births

16

8

Early neonatal deaths

22

11

Total perinatal deaths

38

19

 

Table 3: Various reasons of early perinatal deaths

Cause of death

No. of cases

% (out of total deaths) n=22

% (out of total neonates) N=200

Respiratory Distress syndrome

13

59.09%

6.50%

Birth asphyxia

5

22.73%

2.50%

Sepsis

4

18.18%

2.00%

Total

22

100.00%

11.00%

 

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates that twin pregnancies are associated with a high burden of adverse perinatal outcomes. Low birth weight was observed in two-thirds of neonates, with nearly one-quarter classified as very low birth weight. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have identified low birth weight as a hallmark complication of twin gestations [10,11].

 

The proportion of neonates weighing more than 2500 g was low, reflecting the combined effects of prematurity and limited intrauterine growth in twin pregnancies. Similar observations have been reported in both Indian and international studies [12].

 

Stillbirths accounted for 8% of perinatal outcomes in this study. Although advances in antenatal care have reduced fetal losses, stillbirths remain a significant concern in twin pregnancies, particularly in settings with limited resources [13].

 

The early neonatal mortality rate of 11% observed in this study is higher than that reported for singleton pregnancies and aligns with findings from other tertiary care centres in developing countries [14]. The concentration of deaths in the early neonatal period highlights the vulnerability of twins immediately after birth.

 

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) emerged as the leading cause of early neonatal deaths, followed by birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis. These findings underscore the dominant role of prematurity-related complications in determining neonatal survival in twin pregnancies [15,16]. Strengthening neonatal intensive care facilities and ensuring timely antenatal interventions such as corticosteroid administration may help improve outcomes in terms of mortality as well as morbidity esp in cases of RDS, birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis [17].

 

CONCLUSION

Twin pregnancies are associated with high rates of low birth weight, stillbirths, and early neonatal mortality. Prematurity and its related complications remain the principal contributors to adverse perinatal outcomes. Enhanced antenatal surveillance, appropriate delivery planning, and improved neonatal care services are essential to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors acknowledge the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GMC, Kota and all participants for their cooperation during the study. The authors also thank Dr. Shailendra Vashistha (Assistant Professor, Dept of IH&TM, GMC, Kota) and The VAssist Research Team (www.thevassist.com) for their contribution in manuscript editing and submission process.

 

Conflict of Interest: None

Source of Funding: Nil

 

REFERENCES

  1. Luke B, Brown MB. Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1264-72.
  2. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM. Risk factors for preterm birth in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:373-80.
  3. Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239-49.
  4. Vogel JP, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancy. BJOG. 2013;120:757-66.
  5. Wilcox AJ. Birth weight and perinatal mortality. JAMA. 1995;273:198-202.
  6. Blickstein I. Normal and abnormal growth of multiples. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:177-85.
  7. Goldenberg RL, et al. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75-84.
  8. Ananth CV, et al. Perinatal mortality in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1169-76.
  9. Lawn JE, et al. Neonatal survival: a global perspective. Lancet. 2005;365:891-900.
  10. Spellacy WN, et al. Perinatal mortality in multiple gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:146-51.
  11. Smits J, et al. Twin birth outcomes in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114:170-4.
  12. Sebire NJ, et al. Growth restriction in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:861-5.
  13. Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Special considerations for twins. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26:67-79.
  14. Agarwal R, et al. Neonatal mortality in tertiary care hospitals in India. Indian Pediatr. 2007;44:165-73.
  15. Fanaroff AA, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes. Pediatrics. 2007;119:695-702.
  16. Stoll BJ, et al. Neonatal sepsis in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010;125:7-15.
  17. Haridas C, Meena CP, Thomas S, Mohan C, Gupta RK. Evaluation of clinical profile of neonatal seizures and outcome interventions. Biomed Biopharm Res. 2024;21(2):11-21.
Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Intraoperative Blood Loss Between Cemented and Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1795-1799
Original Article Open Access
Effectiveness of E Learning Modules in Teaching Medico Legal Procedures
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1805-1809
Original Article Open Access
STUDY OF MATERNAL NEAR MISS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1800-1804
Original Article Open Access
Spirometric Patterns Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Tertiary Care Centre
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 1787-1789
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue-5
Citations
11 Views
7 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved