International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-4 : 176-233 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16416872
Original Article
Nebulised Dexmedetomidine as Premedication in Paediatric Patients: A Randomised Study
 ,
 ,
 ,
Abstract

Background: Preoperative anxiety is frequently observed among paediatric patients due to separation from parents, unfamiliar hospital surroundings, and anticipation of pain. Such anxiety is linked to several adverse outcomes, including distress during recovery and behavioral disturbances like nightmares, bedwetting, and eating issues. Managing this anxiety is a crucial responsibility for anaesthesiologists. Nebulised dexmedetomidine has emerged as a promising non-invasive option for premedication in children. However, its optimal dosing remains under investigation. This study compares the efficacy of two doses—2 mcg/kg and 3 mcg/kg—of nebulised dexmedetomidine in paediatric premedication.

Methodology: In this prospective, randomised trial, 78 children aged 1–8 years were assigned to two groups. Group A received 2 mcg/kg and Group B received 3 mcg/kg of nebulised dexmedetomidine preoperatively. Thirty minutes post-nebulisation, Parental Separation Anxiety Scale (PSAS) scores were recorded. Mask Acceptance Scores (MAS) were assessed before anaesthesia induction. All participants underwent general anaesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation levels, and emergence agitation were also evaluated and compared using standard statistical tests. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Group B demonstrated significantly improved parental separation (p<0.003) and mask acceptance (p<0.014) compared to Group A. Hemodynamic stability was maintained in both groups without statistically significant differences. No adverse events were observed during the perioperative period.

Conclusion: Nebulised dexmedetomidine at a dose of 3 mcg/kg is more effective than 2 mcg/kg in improving parental separation and mask acceptance in paediatric patients, without compromising safety or hemodynamic stability.

Recommended Articles
Loading Image...
Volume-6, Issue-4
Citations
439 Views
451 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
pdf Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
© Copyright IJMPR | All Rights Reserved