International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2463-2468
Research Article
Morphological and Morphometric study of the foramina of the middle cranial fossa in dried human skulls
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
April 13, 2026
Accepted
May 25, 2026
Published
June 8, 2026
Abstract

Background: The foramina of the middle cranial fossa—specifically the foramen ovale, foramen rotundum, foramen spinosum, and foramen lacerum—serve as channels for important neurovascular structures. Understanding their morphological variations and morphometric measurements is crucial for neurosurgeons, radiologists, and anatomists during diagnostic and surgical procedures.

Aim and Objectives: To evaluate the morphology and morphometry of the foramina of the middle cranial fossa in dry human skulls and to analyze their variations.

Methods: The present osteological study was conducted on 50 dried adult human skulls obtained from the Department of Anatomy Integral University Lucknow. The anteroposterior diameter (APD) and mediolateral diameter (MLD) of the foramen ovale, rotundum, spinosum, and lacerum were measured using a digital vernier caliper. The shapes of the foramina were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to compare right and left side measurements.

Results: The foramen ovale most commonly exhibited an oval shape, followed by round and almond shapes. The mean APD of the foramen ovale was approximately 6.62 ± 1.11 mm on the right side and 6.72 ± 1.08 mm on the left, while the mean width was 3.78 ± 0.89 mm on the right and 3.89 ± 0.73 mm on the left. The foramen spinosum predominantly showed a round shape, whereas the foramen rotundum was mainly round or oval. The foramen lacerum commonly displayed an irregular shape. No statistically significant difference was observed between the right and left sides for most parameters.

Conclusion: The present study highlights the morphologic and morphometric variations of the foramina of the middle cranial fossa. Such anatomical information is essential for neurosurgical planning and radiological interpretation, particularly in procedures involving the trigeminal nerve and middle cranial fossa structures

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

The skull’s interior is divided into three cranial fossae—anterior, middle, and posterior—which together support and protect the Brain. The middle cranial fossa (MCF) is a depression within the skull base, primarily situated in the temporal region, lying between the petrous part of the temporal bone and the lesser wing of the sphenoid bone. [1, 2] Anteriorly, it is bounded by the posterior margin of the lesser wing of the sphenoid, the anterior clinoid processes, and the anterior border of the sulcus chiasmatis. Posteriorly, its limits are defined by the superior border of the petrous portion of the temporal bone, the posterior clinoid processes, and the dorsum sellae. Laterally, the middle cranial fossa is enclosed by the greater wing of the sphenoid, and the floor of the fossa is formed centrally by the body of the sphenoid bone and laterally by its greater wings.

Several foramina are present in the middle cranial fossa, which may be irregular or regular in shape. The main foramina include the foramen rotundum, ovale, spinosum, and lacerum, all of which are located in the greater wing of the sphenoid bone. These openings serve as important passageways for vital neurovascular structures entering and leaving the middle cranial fossa. In addition, this fossa houses key anatomical structures such as the cavernous sinus, hypophysis cerebri (pituitary gland), temporal lobes of the cerebrum, middle meningeal artery, and the trigeminal ganglion. [1, 2]

 

In the greater wing of the sphenoid bone, anteromedial part, find the foramen rotundum, which is situated between the mandibular and ophthalmic divisions of the trigeminal nerve. It serves as a passage through which the maxillary nerve passes through it and arises from the anterior convex surface of the trigeminal ganglion. In the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, the maxillary nerve runs forward, neighbouring the oculomotor and trochlear nerves, as well as the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve. After passing the foramen rotundum, the maxillary nerve exits the middle cranial fossa and enters the upper part of the pterygopalatine fossa. The foramen rotundum runs downward and opens into the pterygopalatine fossa, providing a direct pathway between the middle cranial fossa and this space. [4, 5, 6]

 

The foramen ovale lies just posterior to the foramen rotundum and lateral to the posterior end of the carotid groove. It is an oval opening at the base of the skull that serves as an important passageway for several vital structures. These include the mandibular nerve, which supplies derivatives of the first branchial arch; the lesser petrosal nerve, a parasympathetic nerve that passes to the otic ganglion; an emissary vein connecting the pterygoid venous plexus with the cavernous sinus; and the accessory meningeal artery, which supplies the dura mater of the middle cranial fossa. Owing to the critical neurovascular structures it transmits, the foramen ovale holds considerable clinical importance in diagnostic and surgical procedures and contributes significantly to improved surgical outcomes. [8, 9]

 

The foramen spinosum is located in front and towards the midline of the sphenoid bone's spine, and behind and to the side of the foramen ovale. It is one of the main Openings on the infratemporal face of the greater wing of the sphenoid bone. This opening allows the passage of the meningeal branch of the mandibular nerve, the middle meningeal artery, and the middle meningeal vein. [11, 12] The foramen spinosum also serves as an important anatomical landmark in cases of skull base trauma, especially when the middle cranial and infratemporal fossae are involved.

 

The foramen lacerum is a triangular-shaped opening situated at the junction of three bones. The pterygoid process and the greater wing of the sphenoid bone, the posterolateral border by the apex of the petrous part of the temporal bone, and the posteromedial border by the basilar part of the occipital bone form its anterior border. [7, 12]

 

Several important structures

pass over the superior surface of the foramen lacerum, rather than through it. These include the internal carotid artery as it courses horizontally, the accompanying sympathetic plexus, the greater petrosal nerve, an emissary vein connecting the pterygoid venous plexus to the cavernous sinus, and small branches of the ascending pharyngeal artery. [21]

 

MATERIALS & METHODOLOGY

The present descriptive osteological study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy at the Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Lucknow, to examine the morphology and morphometry of the foramina in the middle cranial fossa. A total of 50 adult dry human skulls of unknown sex were included in the study. Only well-preserved, intact skulls with clearly identifiable middle cranial fossa foramina were selected, while damaged skulls and those exhibiting pathological deformities or fractures at the cranial base were excluded to ensure Accuracy of observations. Before starting the work, a clearance certificate from the institutional ethical committee was obtained.

 

Measurements

All measurements were taken using a digital Vernier caliper, divider, and measuring scale. The valuate parameters for each foramen—namely the foramen, rotundum, ovale, spinosum, and lacerum, which included the, mediolateral diameter, anteroposterior diameter and overall shape, providing a comprehensive assessment of their anatomical variations.

 

 

RESULTS

Foramen ovale

The mean Anteroposterior diameter was 6.62 ± 1.11 mm on the right side and 6.72 ± 1.08 mm on the left side, while the mean width was 3.78 ± 0.89 mm on the right and 3.89 ± 0.73 mm on the left.

 

Foramen Rotundum

The mean Anteroposterior diameter was 4.42 ± 0.66 mm on the right side and 4.41±0.59 mm on the left side the mean Transverse diameter was 3.78 ± 0.89 mm on the right and 3.89 ± 0.73 mm on the left

                                                                               

Foramen Spinosum

The mean Anteroposterior diameter was 3.21 ± 0.32 mm on the right side and 3.10 ±0.50 mm on the left side, the mean mediolateral diameter was 2.53 ± 0.61 mm on the right and 2.47 ± 0.54 mm on the left.

 

Foramen Lacerum

The mean Anteroposterior diameter was 6.77 ± 0.74 mm on the right side and 6.73±0.64 mm on the left side, the mean mediolateral diameter was 4.93 ± 0.64 mm on the right and 4.95 ± 0.80 mm on the left.

 

Table 1: Mean value of APD and MLD of all the foramina calculated by the use of Student t- test. (p<0.01)

Foramen

Dimension

Right Side(mm)

Mean ± SD

Left Side(mm)

Mean ± SD

p-value

Foramen Ovale

APD

6.13 – 6.61

6.37±0.86

6.09–6.49.

6.29±0.72

0.62

 

MLD

4.15–4.49

4.32 ± 0.61

4.10–4.4

4.25±0.54

0.54

Foramen Rotundum

APD

4.23–4.61

4.42 ± 0.66

4.24–4.5

4.41±0.59

0.78

 

MLD

3.82–4.13

3.97 ± 0.55

3.76–4.0

3.91±0.53

0.58

Foramen Spinosum

APD

3.12–3.30

3.21 ± 0.32

2.96–3.24

3.10±0.50

0.19

 

MLD

2.36–2.70

2.53 ± 0.61

2.32– 2.62

2.47±0.54

0.63

Foramen Lacerum

APD

6.56–6.98

6.77 ± 0.74

6.55–6.92

6.73±0.64

0.77

 

MLD

4.75–5.11

4.93 ± 0.64

4.72–5.17

4.95±0.80

0.89

 

Figure 1: The comparison of anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions of all foramina

Table 2: Distribution of shapes for Foramen Ovale, Rotundum, Spinosum, and Lacerum.

Foramen

Shape

Right Side (%)

Left Side (%)

Total (%)

Foramen Ovale

Oval

72

68

70

 

Almond

10

16

13

 

Irregular

00

02

01

 

Round

18

14

16

Foramen Rotundum

Oval

22

24

23

 

Round

78

76

77

Foramen Spinosum

Oval

14

10

12

 

Irregular

08

08

16

 

Round

78

82

80

Foramen Lacerum

Irregular

64

66

65

 

Round

26

24

25

Oval

10

10

10

 

DISCUSSION

The present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the morphometry and morphology of the foramina of the middle cranial fossa, namely the foramen ovale, rotundum, spinosum, and lacerum. The findings consistently demonstrate a high degree of bilateral symmetry in both dimensions and shape, reflecting the stable anatomical configuration of these structures.

 

The present study found that the mean anteroposterior diameters were 6.37 ± 0.86 mm on the right side and 6.29 ± 0.72 mm on the left side. The mediolateral diameters were 4.32 ± 0.61 mm and 4.25 ± 0.54 mm, respectively, with no significant difference between the two sides. Alike findings were also reported by S. Santhosh et al. (2020) and Gowri Shankar et al., who reported similar symmetrical sizes. However, slightly higher values were reported by Supriya Garapati et al. and Shivamurthy K et al., suggesting minor differences across populations. The oval shape was most commonly seen at 70% dried skulls, which is consistent with studies by Agarwal et al. Sarbani Das et al. and Desai et al., all of which identified the oval shape as the most common. This consistency indicates that the oval shape is a stable anatomical characteristic, though the proportion of other shapes can differ between studies.

 

Foramen rotundum, the present study found that the mean Anteroposterior diameter was 4.42 ± 0.66 mm on the right side and 4.41±0.59 mm on the left side. The mean transverse diameter was 3.78 ± 0.89 mm on the right and 3.89 ± 0.73 mm on the left no significant difference between the right and left sides for both APD and MLD. This finding contrasts with Reema Rao et al., who reported significant asymmetry in the mediolateral diameter. Nonetheless, these results align with those from Binita Purohit et al., who observed consistent dimensions. The round shape was predominant at 77%, consistent with many earlier studies, confirming the similar structure of this foramen.

 

Foramen spinosum, the present study found that the mean Anteroposterior diameter was 3.21 ± 0.32 mm on the right side and 3.10 ±0.50 mm on the left side, the mean mediolateral diameter was 2.53 ± 0.61 mm on the right and 2.47 ± 0.54 mm on the left, with no significant side differences. These findings match those of Pallavi Sharma et al and Siddharth Tewari et al., who also noted no significant variation between sides. The round shape was the most common at 80%, which corresponds with the results from Shaik Hussain Saheb et al. and Camellia Chanda et al. However, the study also found minor variations, such as oval and irregular shapes, suggesting slight anatomical diversity.

 

Foramen lacerum, the present study showed the mean Anteroposterior diameter was 6.77 ± 0.74 mm on the right side and 6.73±0.64 mm on the left side, the mean mediolateral diameter was 4.93 ± 0.64 mm on the right and 4.95 ± 0.80 mm on the left. With no significant bilateral difference. These measurements are lower than those reported by Abeer Fareed et al., who found larger sizes as compared to the present study; however, they were still insignificant. The irregular shape was the most common in this study, which aligns with traditional anatomical descriptions, though studies done by Sanghpriya Chaudhary et al. reported round shapes to be more common. These differences might stem from variations in sample makeup, sex Distribution, and measurement methods.

 

Overall, the present study is consistent with most of the literature reviewed, showing bilateral symmetry and common shapes. Nevertheless, the variations in morphometric values across different studies highlight the impact of regional, racial, and methodological factors.

 

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the morphology and morphometry of the foramina of the middle cranial fossa. The foramen ovale most commonly exhibited an oval shape, while the spinosum and rotundum were predominantly round. The lacerum typically showed an irregular shape.

 

Knowledge of these anatomical variations is essential for neurosurgeons, radiologists, and anatomists. Such information is particularly useful in surgical procedures involving the trigeminal nerve, middle meningeal artery, and skull base structures.

Further studies with larger sample sizes and advanced imaging techniques are recommended to enhance understanding of these anatomical variations.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Thandalam C. Morphometric study of various foramina in the middle cranial fossa of the human skull. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology. 2017 Oct; 4(4):574-8. DOI: 10.18231/2394-2126.2017.0141
  2. S. M Gray’s Anatomy. 39thed. New York, Elsevier Churchill Livinstone, 2005, 462-6.
  3. Nafis Ahmad Faruqi, Human Osteology: A Clinical Orientation Third Edition
  4. Purohit B, Dr. Rajguru J, Dr. Shah S, Dr. Shah V (2024), Anatomical Variations of Foramen Rotundum and Its Clinical Significance in Gujarat Region – A Cross Sectional Study, Educational Administration: Theory and Practice,30(1), 1877 - 1883. Doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i1.6697
  5. Cappello ZJ, Potts KL. Anatomy, Pterygopalatine Fossa. 2022 Sep 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan–. PMID: 30020641.
  6. Standring S: Gray’s Anatomy 42nd ed. Standring S (ed): Elsevier, London; 2020.https://www.elsevier.com/books/gray%27s-anatomy/978-0-7020-7705-0
  7. Singh V. Textbook of Anatomy: Head, Neck and Brain. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2014.
  8. Shivamurthy K1, Prathap Kumar J2,*, Padmalatha K3, Prakash B S4, Amrita N Shamanewadi5..
  9. Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. 39th ed. United Kingdom: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
  10. Yanagi S. Developmental studies on the foramen rotundum, foramen ovale, and foramen spinosum of the human sphenoid bone. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1987; 62(3):485–96.
  11. Tewari S, Gupta C, Palimar V, Kathur SG. Morphometric analysis of foramen spinosum in Lang J, Maier R, Schafhauser O. Postnatal enlargement of the foramina rotundum, ovale spinosum and their topographical changes”. Anatomischer Anzeiger 1984;156:351-87
  12. Sanghpriya Chaudhary1, Suchit Kumar2, Shivani Chaudhary3, Shashi Munjal4 Morphometric Variations of the Foramen Lacerum in Dry Skulls and its Clinical Significance: A Cross-sectional Study 2023 Nov. DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2023/66442.2942
  13. Bazroon AA, Singh P. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Foramen Lacerum. [Updated 2022 Jul 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541026/
  14. Khonsary SA, Ma Q, Villablanca P, Emerson J, Malkasian D. Clinical functional anatomy of the pterygopalatine ganglion, cephalgia and related dysautonomias: A review. Surg Neurol Int. 2013; 4(Suppl 6):S422-28. Doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.121628.
  15. Christodouleas Hristov B, Lin SH, John P. Radiation oncology: A question-based review. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. Page 138.
  16. Desai SD, Shaik HS, Shepur MP, Thomas ST, Mavishettar GF, Haseena S. Morphometric analysis of foramen ovale..
  17. Arifa Mehraj, 2Dr. Javed Ahmad Khan, 3Zeenat Kausar, 4Dr. Ghulam Mohammad Bhat, 5Dr. Sajad Hamid Examining foramen ovale in dried human skulls using a morphometric approach and its clinical implications 2024 jan.
  18. Supriya Garapati1,*, Ariyanachi Kaliappan2, Subhashini Rani Vuba3, Raviteja1,Kishore Yadav Punnapa2, Bollavaram Pullanna3Morphological Variations and Morphometric Analysis of Foramen Ovale in South Indian Population 2024 march. DOI:10.14302/issn.2577-2279.ijha-23- 4886
  19. Kishore Yadav Punnapa2, Bollavaram Pullanna3Morphological Variations and Morphometric Analysis of Foramen Ovale in South Indian Population 2024 march.
  20. Santhosh S, Showri R, Sreekanth C. Analysis of Foramina of the Middle Cranial Fossa with Special Emphasis on Morphology and Morphometry of Foramen Ovale–An Observational Study. Int. J. Anat. Radiol. Surg. 2022; 11:44-7. DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2022/50241.2749
  21. Naeem AE, Farid A. A morphologic and morphometric study of the foramen Lacerum in adult human skulls: an osteological study in Upper Egypt. Sohag Medical Journal. 2019 Jan 1;23(1):219-21 DOI:10.21608/smj.2019.43707
  22. Camellia Chanda1, K.K.P. Singh2, Rajiv Ranjan3*,Renu Prasad(2019) ,Anatomical Variations of Foramen Spinosum in Adult Human Skulls of Jharkhand Population IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 18, Issue 4 Ser. 18 (April. 2019), PP 01-07 www.iosrjournals.org DOI:10.9790/0853-1804180107
  23. Das S, Bhattacharjee S, Pal S. A morphometric study of the foramen ovale. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2019 Oct 15; 6(3):359-62. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.3927-10.2
  24. Shankar G, Muthukumaravel N. A morphological and morphometric study of foramen ovale in dry skulls of Indian population. National Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):38-42. DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688892
  25. R. Reema Rao1*, Dr. K. Manivannan2, Dr. R. Sasikumar3 Morphological and Morphometric Analysis of Middle Cranial Fossa Foramina in Adult Human Skulls: Implications for Neurosurgical Procedures. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i1S.2266.
  26. Kumaresan M. morphological study of middle cranial fossa and its variations DOI: 10.18231/2394-2126.2017.0141
  27. Sophia MM, Shruthy KM, Sasirekha M. A morphometric study on the foramen ovale. Int J Anat Res. 2018 Nov 5; 6(4.2):5915-20. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.3927-10.2
  28. Farooq B, Gupta S, Raina S. Anatomic variations in foramen ovale and foramen spinosum. Jk Science. 2018 Jul 1; 20(3):112-5.
  29. Kumar B, Sinha RR, Kumar S, Akhtar MJ, Ratnesh R, Kumar A, Kulkarni JP, Kumar V. Morphometric study of foramen ovale in human skull in the population of Bihar. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018; 17(3):40-
  30. N.S, Venkateshu. K.V. Morphometric and morphological analysis of foramen ovale in dryhuman skull. Int J Anat Res 2017; 5(1):3547-3551. DOI:10.16965/ijar.2017.109.
  31. Shaik Hussain Saheb 1, Khaleel N *2, Pavan P Havaldar 3, Shruthi B.N 4 Morphological and morphometric study of foramen sponosum 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.389
  32. Rao BS, Yesender M, Vinila BS. Morphological variations and morphometric analysis of the foramen ovale with its clinical implications. Int J Anat Res. 2017; 5(1):3394-DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.487.
  33. Shikha Sharma, Chetna Thakur, Bhawani Shankar Modi, Tejendra Singh. Study of anatomic variant of foramen ovale and spinosum in dried human skull Int J Anat Res 2016; 4(1):2002-2006. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2015.1 Khairnar KB, Bhusari PA. An anatomical study on the foramen ovale and the foramen spinosum. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013 Mar 1;7(3):427 DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2015.130
  34. Jaykaran Charan, Tamoghna Biswas1 How to Calculate Sample Size for Different Study Designs in Medical Research? Doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232
  35. Plou P, Serioli S, Leonel LCPC, Alexander AY, Agosti E, Vilany L, Graepel S, Choby G, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Peris-Celda M. Surgical Anatomy and Approaches of the Anterior Cranial Fossa from a Transcranial and Endonasal Perspective. Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 1; 15(9):2587. Doi: 10.3390/cancers15092587. PMID: 37174053; PMCID: PMC10177555.
  36. N.S, Venkateshu. K.V. Morphometric and morphological analysis of foramen ovale in dryhuman skull. Int J Anat Res 2017; 5(1):3547-3551. DOI:10.16965/ijar.2017.109. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.109
  37. Khairnar KB, Bhusari PA. An anatomical study on the foramen ovale and the foramen spinosum. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013 Mar 1;7(3):427 Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4894.2790
  38. Bloch, O.; Demonte, F. Malignant tumors of the skull base. Preface. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 24, xi–xii. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2012.08.012
  39. Ivan, M.E.; Han, S.J.; Aghi, M.K. Tumors of the anterior skull base. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2014, 14, 425– 438. DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2014.892830
Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
Role of Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Biliary Lesions and Correlation with Histopathology
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2501-2508
Original Article Open Access
A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF FETOMATERNAL OUTCOMES IN ECLAMPSIA PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2509-2513
Research Article Open Access
Evaluation of Carrying Angle with Hand Grip Strength in Young Adults; An Anatomical Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2469-2474
Research Article Open Access
Dermatoglyphic Patterns in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study from North India
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2451-2456
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 3
Citations
8 Views
7 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved