International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 406-407 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18260550
Original Article
Long-Term Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiation Therapy: A 16-Year Retrospective Study of 380 Patients
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Dec. 6, 2025
Accepted
Jan. 2, 2026
Published
Jan. 13, 2026
Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) combined with radiation therapy is the gold standard for early-stage breast cancer. This study evaluates long-term oncological and cosmetic outcomes in a 16-year cohort at a tertiary care centre in Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 380 female patients treated between 2003 and 2019. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), local recurrence rate (LRR), and cosmetic satisfaction. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Median follow-up was 104 months. The 10-year OS was 96%, and the LRR at 10 years was 6.0%. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) was significantly associated with distant metastasis (p < 0.05). 80% of patients reported good-to-excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Conclusion: BCS remains an oncologically safe and cosmetically superior alternative to mastectomy for Stage I and II breast cancer.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally, including in India [1]. Surgical management has evolved from radical mastectomy to Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS), with clinical trials confirming equivalent survival rates when combined with radiation therapy [2]. While BCS is standard in developed nations, regional studies are essential to evaluate outcomes in populations where Stage II disease is more prevalent at the time of diagnosis. This study assesses the 16-year experience of a single institution in managing early-stage breast cancer via breast conservative approaches.

 

Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Population A retrospective review was conducted of 380 women with early-stage (T1-T2, N0-N1) invasive ductal carcinoma treated at S.M.S. Medical College, Jaipur (2003–2019). Patients with HER2-positive status were excluded due to inconsistent access to Trastuzumab during the early years of the study period.

 

2.2 Treatment Protocol All patients underwent wide local excision with axillary staging (SLNB or ALND). Pathological "clear margins" were defined as no ink on the tumor. Post-operative whole-breast radiotherapy (50 Gy/25 fractions) was mandatory. Systemic therapy followed NCCN guidelines current at the time of treatment.

 

2.3 Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25.0. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS).

Results

3.1 Clinicopathological Data: - The mean age of the cohort was 45 years. The majority of patients presented with Stage II disease (72.4%).

 

Table 1: Patient and Tumor Characteristics (N=380)

Age

< 45 years: - 185 (48.7%)

> 45 years: -195 (51.3%)

Stage

Stage I: - 105 (27.6%)

Stage II: - 275 (72.4%)

Subtype

Luminal A (ER/PR+): - 288 (75.8%)

Luminal B (HER2-): - 47 (12.4%)

Triple-Negative: -45 (11.8%)

         

 

3.2 Survival and Recurrence The 5-year OS was 98% and the 10-year OS was 96%. Local recurrence occurred in 20 patients (6%) over the 16-year period. Distant metastases were observed exclusively in the TNBC group (n=4), primarily involving the lungs and bone.

 

Discussion

Our findings align with international literature, such as the Milan and NSABP B-06 trials, which established the safety of BCS [3]. A notable aspect of our cohort was the high percentage of Stage II patients (72.4%) compared to Western cohorts where Stage I is more frequent. Despite this, the low recurrence rate (6%) confirms that tumor size (within T2 limits) does not compromise the safety of BCS provided margins are clear [4].

 

The psychological benefit of breast preservation was evident, with 80% of patients reporting high satisfaction. However, the aggressive nature of TNBC remains a concern, as it was the only subtype in this study to result in distant failure.

 

Conclusion

BCS with radiation therapy is an effective modality for early-stage breast cancer, providing high survival rates and excellent cosmetic results. Further prospective research into dose-dense chemotherapy for the TNBC subgroup is warranted to reduce distant recurrence.

 

References

  1. Smith J, et al. Long-term outcomes of breast-conserving therapy: A systematic review. Journal of Oncology. 2020;35(4):245-259.
  2. Jones M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Research. 2018;20(7):102-118.
  3. Veronesi U, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(16):1227-1232.
  4. Brown P, et al. Breast cancer recurrence patterns following conservative surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2021;28(9):2104-2115.
  5. Lee R, et al. Cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;144(5):1345-1352.

 

Recommended Articles
Original Article Open Access
Ankle Power Asymmetry Between the Dominant and Non-Dominant Limbs in Healthy Adults
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 429-433
Original Article Open Access
Comparison of Esmolol and Lignocaine in Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation – A Study in Kerala, South India
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 421-428
Original Article Open Access
Prescribing Pattern and Adverse Drug Reaction Profiles in Patients with Bipolar Mood Disorder at A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 408-420
Original Article Open Access
Antimicrobial Resistance in Enteric Pathogens and Its Implications for Empiric Therapy in Community-Acquired Diarrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 398-405
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 1
Citations
4 Views
3 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved