International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-4 : 1022-1027 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16937564
Research Article
Incidence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections In A Tertiary Care Hospital
 ,
 ,
Received
July 7, 2025
Published
Aug. 24, 2025
Abstract

Central Venous Catheters (CVCs) are indispensable in current intensive care treatment; also pose a greater risk of device related infections in comparison to any other type of medical device and are major cause of morbidity, mortality and increased expense. A cross sectional prospective study of one year duration was conducted in the tertiary care hospital ICUs , to determine the incidence of the central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and to identify the associated risk factors. Two hundred and eleven patients admitted to various ICUs with an indwelling central venous catheter (CVC) for more than 48 h were monitored. The incidence rate of CLABSI in our study is 9.48% and 13.5 per 1000 central line days. Klebsiella spp.(35%) are the most commonly isolated micro-organism and other organisms isolated are Acinetobacter baumannii (15%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%), Escherichia coli(10%), Staphylococcus aureus(10%), Candida tropicalis(15%) and Candida krusei (5%).The age group of patients were ranging from a minimum of 1 year to maximum of 77 years with a mean age of 33.52 ± 19.75 years from various speciality ICUs were included among which the highest number of samples were received from surgical ICU, that is 75 samples (35.55%) followed by bone marrow transplant unit and medical ICU. The most commonly used catheter was subclavian catheter (74.8%).

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Health‑care‑associated infection (HCAI) is perhaps the most important factor that adversely affects the performance and image of a hospital. One of the most common HCAIs is central line‑associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) which is indispensable in current intensive care treatment; also pose a greater risk of device related infections in comparison to any other type of medical device[1]. Besides increasing morbidity and mortality, it prolongs the hospital stay of patients, increases bed occupancy, and puts undue pressure on the already strained resources of the hospital, patients, and community[2]. CLABSI has been estimated to increase the duration of hospitalization by 7–21 days. In comparison to developed nations, the baseline rate of CLABSI is found to be around eight‑fold higher in India[3]. The prevention of CLABSI requires knowledge of the infection rates, their associated factors, sources, the pathogens involved as well as their antimicrobial profile[4].    

 

METHODOLOGY

This study employed a cross-sectional design to determine the proportion of microorganisms in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) and analyze their associated factors providing a comprehensive overview of the current burden of CLABSIs in the ICU.

 

SETTING AND DURATION

This study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and associated hospitals, Indore (M.P) for a period of one year from December 2022 to December 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included ICU patients with central venous catheters in place for more than 48 hours, as prolonged catheterization is a well-documented risk factor for CLABSIs. Patients were enrolled based on specific inclusion criteria:

  • Age >1 year.
  • No bloodstream infections at the time of catheter insertion.
  • Willingness to provide informed consent.

 

DATA COLLECTION

Data collection was systematic and involved multiple steps to ensure accuracy and reliability

  1. Microbiological Sampling:
  • Patients were identified (who fulfil the criteria of CLABSI) and their blood samples were collected in BHI broth.
  • Then the BHI broth was incubated overnight aerobically at 37℃.
  • The sample was inoculated onto Blood Agar, MacConkey Agar and Sabouraud’s Dextrose Agar.
  • If there is no growth then the sample is sub-cultured on alternate days for 7 days before reporting it as sterile.
  1. Pathogen Identification:
    Standard microbiological protocols, including Gram’s staining, culture on blood agar and MacConkey agar, and biochemical tests, were used for pathogen identification.
  2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing:
    Isolates underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Resistance profiles were categorized as sensitive, intermediate, or resistant based on CLSI Guidelines 2022

 

DATA ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria and their resistance patterns. Chi-square test was applied to determine associations between patient demographics, catheter duration and infection rates. Results were presented as percentages, means, and standard deviations, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05.

 

RESULT

Table No. 1:  Incidence rate of CLABSI

 

Number

Percentage

No. of culture positive patients

20

9.48%

Total no.of patients with central line

211

 

 

The incidence rate of CLABSI is 9.48%.

Chart No.1: Age wise distribution of CLABSI patients

 

 

Table No. 2:  Gender wise distribution of CLABSI patients

 

No of CLABSI patients(N=20)

Percentage

Female

6

30%

Male

14

70%

Total number of cases

20

 

The percentage of male patients is more than female patients.

 

Table No. 3:  Unit wise Distribution of Total Patients

Unit

Number of patients(N=211)

Percentage

BMT UNIT

48

22.75%

PICU

11

5.21%

MICU

39

18.48%

SICU

75

35.55%

NEURO ICU

28

13.27%

HD UNIT

10

4.74%

The highest percentage of patients enrolled were from Surgical ICU with 35.55%.

 

Chart No.2: Unit wise distribution of CLABSI patients

 

 

Table No. 4: Distribution of patients according to days of central line

Unit

<7 days

>7 days

BMT UNIT

23

25

PICU

9

2

MICU

33

6

SICU

55

20

NEURO ICU

16

12

HD UNIT

9

1

Total

145

66

Overall there is higher number of patients with central line for a duration of <7 days except in BMT unit where the patients were higher with central line >7 days duration.

 

Chart No.3: Distribution of CLABSI patients according to days of central line

 

 

Table No. 5: Association of duration of central line days with CLABSI

 

CLABSI positive

CLABSI negative

Chi square statistic

p- value

>7 days

13

53

11.69

0.00063

<7 days

7

138

Total

20

191

   

The p value is significant (<0.05). And in our study the p value obtained is 0.00063 which states significant association between central line duration and incidence of CLABSI. With the increase in duration of central line, the incidence rate of CLABSI increases.

 

Table No. 6:  Distribution of total patients according to catheter type

Type of Central line catheter

Number of patients(N=211)

Percentage

Subclavian

158

74.88%

Femoral

8

3.79%

Internal jugular

3

1.42%

Hemodialysis Catheter

10

4.74%

PICC

32

15.17%

The highest percentage of central line catheter used were subclavian vein catheter with 74.88%.

 

Chart No.4: Distribution of total patients according to catheter type

 

 

CLABSI Rate

In our study the CLABSI rate is 13.5 CVC days.

(Number of CLABSI cases/ Number of central line days) X 1000

(20/1480)X100 = 13.5 per 1000 Central line days

 

Chart No.5: Proportion of micro-organisms isolated in CLABSI patients

 

 

DISCUSSION

In our study, a total of 211 patients with central line were included whose blood samples were tested for culture positivity. Out of the total samples tested, 20 were culture positive which gives us a incidence rate of 9.48% which is in agreement with the study conducted  by Maqbool et al.[4] 2023. Majority of culture positivity was seen in the age group of  41-50years(17.06%) which is concordant with majority of studies like that of Dubey P et al. [5]. 20 isolates culture positive which included 14(70%) male patients and 6(30%) female patients. This derivation is similar in most of the studies like that of Arvindh Santhosh SR et al. [6] where there were 72% males and 28% females.

 

 In our study, various speciality ICUs were included among which the highest number of samples were received from surgical ICU, that is 75samples (35.55%) followed by bone marrow transplant unit and medical ICU. Culture positivity in our study was highest among bone marrow transplant unit (30%) followed by surgical and neurology ICU (both were 20%). The highest percentage of positive cases from bone marrow transplant unit can be attributed to the fact that the patients dealt here were immunocompromised. Singh et al. [2] conducted a study in 2022 which also had the same pattern with number of samples more in surgical ICU than medical ICU and other units. Toor H et al. [7] conducted a study in 2022 which had similar finding. Whereas in study of Sarala KS et al. [8]  the proportion of medical units and pediatric units at the higher end than other specialities.

 

There were 145(68.72%) central lines for less than 7 days and 66 (31.28%) central lines for more than 7 days. Furthermore, out of the total 20 culture positive patients 7(35%) were less than 7 days and 13(65%) were more than 7 days. Our study states that the culture positive rate is more when the duration of central line is for more than 7 days which shows significant association between central line duration and incidence of CLABSI with p- value <0.05.  In our study, we obtained an average central line duration to be 7 days because of which we have categorized the duration of central line accesses with a 7 days criteria. The CLABSI rate in our study is 13.5 per 1000 central line days which is almost similar to the CLABSI rate of 12.1 per 1000 central line days obtained in the multicentric surveillance study conducted in 2022 by Purva Mathur et al.[9] We observed that subclavian vein catheters were used in 158 patients (74.88%) followed by PICC in 32 patients  (15.17%) , femoral vein in 8 patients (3.79%),  internal jugular vein catheter in 3 patients (1.42%) and hemodialysis catheter in 10 patients(4.74%). Most of the clinicians prefer subclavian line access over other venous accesses because of the reason that it is associated with lowest risk of infection overall. This is similar to the findings of Darji and Patel et al. [10] where the most common site of insertion was subclavian vein(50%) and 92% in the study conducted by Dr Sonia Mehta et al. [11] There are a number of studies like Ujesh et al.[12], Negi N et al. [13] and Sivakumar V et al. [14] where all demonstrates similar results in support.  

 

The common pathogenic bacteria isolated in our study were Klebsiella spp. (35%), Acinetobacter baumannii (15%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%), Escherichia coli(10%), Staphylococcus aureus(10%), Candida tropicalis(15%) and Candida krusei (5%). This is in concordant with the result obtained in the multicentric study [9] conducted under ICMR’s Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance and Research Network and the NCDC’s National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network, coordinated by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi in 2022 which concluded Klebsiella spp. (24.8%) were the most frequently identified pathogen among CLABSI patients, followed by Acinetobacter spp. (21·3%) and Candida spp. (11·8%) .

 

CONCLUSION

The incidence rate of CLABSI in the present study was in accordance with the average CLABSI rate detected in other studies in India. The CLABSI incidence is significant and associated with prolonged duration of catheterization. Maximal sterile techniques should be practiced while inserting CVC and in after care, regular monitoring of CVC and its need to continue should be measured promptly. By knowing the changing trends of microbial flora, empirical therapy can be formulated for early and effective management of CLABSI.

REFERENCES
1. Mehta, Sonia & Singh, Varsha & Thakur, Jairam & Kumar, Harit. (2020). Central venous catheter-related blood stream infections: Incidence, risk factors and associated pathogens in a university hospital ICU. JK Science. 22. 55-60. 2. Singh S, Yadav P, Goel A, Ahuja N. Incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study. J Mar Med Soc 2023;25:S26-30. 3. Modi C, Shah MB, Trivedi S, Singh S. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2013;9:1359-64. 4. Maqbool S, Sharma R. Incidence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India: A Prospective Study. Cureus. 2023 Aug 31;15(8):e44501. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44501. PMID: 37791205; PMCID: PMC10544503. 5. Dubey P, Varma S, Kujur A, Sharma B. Study of incidence of central line associated blood stream infections in patients admitted in intensive care unit. Int J Adv Med 2021;8:1350-3. 6. Arvindh Santhosh SR, Deepa R, Thasneem Banu S, Gomathi Chitra A, Clinico-Microbiological Profile of Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections In Patients on Haemodialysis, National Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 2018 Apr, Vol-7(2): MO12-MO17 7. Toor H, Farr S, Savla P, et al. (March 03, 2022) Prevalence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) in Intensive Care and Medical-Surgical Units. Cureus 14(3): e22809. DOI 10.7759/cureus.22809 8. Sarala KS, Nanda Kumar BS, Naren dranath V. Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections and Associated Morbidities among Patients in a Ter tiary Care Hospital, Bangalore. Natl J Community Med 2017; 8(9):559-563. 9. Purva Mathur, Paul Malpiedi, Kamini Walia et al, Health-care-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections in a network of hospitals in India: a multicentre, hospital-based, prospective surveillance study, Lancet Glob Health 2022; 10: e1317–25. 10. Darji SM, Patel N. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection: Microbiological Profile and its Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern at Tertiary Care Centre. J Pure Appl Microbiol. Published online 21 April 2023. doi: 10.22207/JPAM.17.2.18 11. Sonia Mehta, Ashwani Kumar, Varsha A Singh, Jai Ram Thakur, Harit Kumar, Central Venous Catheter-related Blood Stream Infections: Incidence, Risk Factors and Associated Pathogens in a University Hospital ICU, JK SCIENCE,Vol. 22 No. 2, April- June 2020 12. Ujesh SN, Jayaprada R, Ramakrishna N, Sharma KK, Rao MH, Samantaray A, et al. A study of microbiological profile and its antimicrobial susceptibility patterns related to central line-associated bloodstream infections in respiratory intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Sci Res 2020;9:25-30. 13. Negi N., Gupta , Chandola , Kataria V., Prevalence of central line associated blood stream infection (CRBSI) and catheter colonization in ICU settings of a tertiary care hospital in sub Himalayan region, October, 2019/ Vol 5/ Issue 10 14. Sivakumar V., Fathima Shazneen, Jefrin Rijo S., Jenita Shiny, Prevention and risk factors associated with incidence of central line associated bloodstream infection: a narrative review, Int J Res Med Sci. 2024 May;12(5):1800-1807
Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Clinical Study of Acceptability & Safety of PPIUCD and Interval IUCD In RMC , Ajmer (Rajsthan)
...
Published: 25/08/2025
Research Article
The Cumulative Burden: A Case of Alcoholic Liver Disease, HIV, And Laryngeal Carcinoma in Chronic Substance Abuse
...
Published: 24/08/2025
Case Report
Nature’s Error…In Mirror He or She…Swyers Syndrome - A Rare Case
...
Published: 25/08/2025
Research Article
Knowledge and Practice of Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Among Mothers of Under One Year Age Children
Published: 25/08/2025
Loading Image...
Volume-6, Issue-4
Citations
26 Views
22 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
pdf Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
© Copyright IJMPR | All Rights Reserved