International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 2617-2625
Research Article
Gender Differences In Medication Adherence Among Patients With Schizophrenia. A Cross-Sectional Study
 ,
Received
June 22, 2026
Accepted
July 10, 2026
Published
July 26, 2026
Abstract

Background: Medication adherence is crucial for optimal management of schizophrenia, yet adherence rates remain low. Emerging evidence suggests that gender-specific factors may influence adherence patterns.

Aim: To assess gender differences in medication adherence and identify associated clinical, psychosocial, and cultural factors in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among diagnosed schizophrenia patients. Medication adherence was evaluated along with insight, symptom severity, side effects, and psychosocial variables. Gender-based comparisons were performed to identify significant predictors of adherence.

Results: Women demonstrated better adherence than men. Better insight, stronger family support, and fewer substance use issues contributed to higher adherence in female patients. In contrast, men showed lower adherence, influenced by higher substance abuse, reduced insight, and greater negative symptom burden. Side effects, internalized stigma, and cultural beliefs also showed gender-linked variations in their impact on adherence.

Conclusion: Gender plays a significant role in determining treatment adherence in schizophrenia. Understanding these differences is essential for designing targeted, patient-centered strategies to improve adherence and clinical outcomes.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe psychiatric disorder characterized by disturbances in thought, perception, affect, and behavior, affecting approximately 1% of the global population [1]. Effective long-term management of schizophrenia relies heavily on consistent adherence to antipsychotic medication, which remains the cornerstone of treatment for symptom control, relapse prevention, and functional recovery [2,3]. Despite the availability of effective pharmacological interventions, medication non-adherence remains a major clinical challenge, with rates ranging from 40% to 60% in various settings [4]. Poor adherence contributes to relapse, hospitalization, poor quality of life, and increased healthcare costs [5].

 

Treatment adherence in schizophrenia is a multidimensional phenomenon, influenced by clinical factors (symptom severity, insight, side-effects), psychosocial variables (stigma, beliefs about illness), and demographic characteristics (age, sex, education) [6,7]. Among these, gender differences in medication adherence have gained increasing attention. Women with schizophrenia often demonstrate better social functioning, stronger treatment engagement, and lower rates of substance use, all of which may influence adherence behaviors [8]. Conversely, men tend to have earlier onset, more negative symptoms, and a higher likelihood of comorbid substance abuse—factors associated with poorer adherence [9,10].

 

Insight into illness has consistently been associated with medication adherence. Patients with poor insight often underestimate the need for continuous treatment, leading to irregular medication intake and higher relapse risk [11]. Similarly, the presence of antipsychotic side-effects—such as extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, and metabolic disturbances—can negatively affect patients’ willingness to continue treatment, and these effects may manifest differently across genders [12].

 

Perceived stigma also plays a crucial role in adherence, as individuals who internalize stereotypes or fear discrimination may avoid taking medication or skip follow-up services [13]. Cultural beliefs regarding the causation of mental illness (e.g., supernatural attributions, fate) can further shape treatment attitudes and adherence patterns, particularly in low-resource settings [14].

 

While numerous studies have examined the determinants of medication adherence in schizophrenia, limited research has specifically explored gender-based differences in these determinants, especially in the Indian context. Given the sociocultural variations in illness beliefs, treatment-seeking behavior, and gender roles, understanding these differences is essential for designing gender-sensitive interventions aimed at improving adherence.

 

Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate medication adherence among male and female patients with schizophrenia and to examine its association with insight, symptom severity, side-effects, stigma, substance use, and attribution of illness, with a specific focus on identifying gender-related differences in these relationships.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

This study was designed as a cross-sectional, hospital-based observational study. Each participant was assessed during a single clinical encounter to evaluate medication adherence and its relationship with insight, symptom severity, and antipsychotic side effects.

 

Study Setting

The study was conducted at the Institute of Mental Health & Hospital (IMHH), Agra, a postgraduate teaching and tertiary referral centre for psychiatric disorders. The hospital has a bed capacity of more than 800, catering to a wide catchment area.

 

Sample Size

A total of 60 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were included in the study.

 

Sampling Method

A purposive sampling technique was employed. Participants were recruited from the follow-up outpatient department (OPD). Eligible individuals were those receiving antipsychotic treatment for at least one year.

 

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of Schizophrenia according to ICD-10 DCR criteria.
  • On prescribed antipsychotic medication for ≥1 year.
  • Age between 18 and 55 years.
  • Either sex with a minimum education of 8th standard.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.
  • Presence of long-standing major medical illness or psychiatric disorder other than schizophrenia.
  • Age below 18 years or above 55 years.

 

Study Tools and Instruments

  1. Socio-Demographic and Clinical Data Sheet

A structured proforma was used to collect demographic information and clinical details, including:

  • duration of illness and treatment
  • current antipsychotic medication and dosage
  • treatment cost
  • distance from treatment centre
  • substance use history: type, quantity, and pattern of intake

 

  1. Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)

The 10-item MARS was used to assess medication adherence.

  • Items 1–4 (from MAQ): scored no = 1, yes = 0
  • Items from DAI:
    • Q6, Q9, Q10: no = 1, yes = 0
    • Q5, Q7, Q8: no = 0, yes = 1

A higher total score indicated better adherence, whereas lower scores reflected poorer adherence.

 

  1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

The PANSS, a 30-item clinician-rated instrument, was used to measure:

  • positive symptoms,
  • negative symptoms, and
  • general psychopathology.

Each item is scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme).

 

  1. Insight Scale for Psychosis

This scale assesses the level of patient insight across three domains:

  • awareness of illness
  • need for treatment
  • attribution of symptoms

Higher scores reflect greater insight.

 

  1. Antipsychotic Side-Effects Checklist (ASC)

The 17-item ASC was used to screen for common antipsychotic side effects and related subjective experiences. The checklist enhances clinician–patient communication about side effects, an important factor influencing adherence.

 

  1. Belief of Causation of Mental Illness Questionnaire

A 19-item questionnaire assessing patients’ beliefs regarding the causes of their illness. Responses were categorized for attributional analysis.

 

  1. Stigma Scale

A 28-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring perceived stigma. It consists of three components:

  1. discrimination
  2. disclosure concerns
  3. perceived positive aspects of mental illness

The scale has demonstrated acceptable reliability (test-retest kappa = 0.4).

 

  1. Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (MAST)

A 24-item scale used to screen for alcohol abuse.

A score >5 is considered indicative of alcoholism.

 

  1. Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST)

A brief tool used to detect problematic patterns of cannabis use, particularly in adolescents and young adults.

 

Ethical Considerations

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality of patient information was strictly maintained. Approval from the institutional ethics committee was obtained prior to the commencement of the study.

 

RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS

Table; 1 Socio demograhpic profile of the sample

Variables

Schizophrenia(n=60)

Gender

M

49(81.6%)

 

F

11(18.4%)

Education

Less than high school

39(65%)

High school

1(1.6%)

intermediate

11(18.3%)

Graduation

9(15%)

Martial status

Married

46(76.6%)

Unmarried

14(23.3%)

Occupation

unskilled

26(43.3%)

semiskilled

11(1.6%)

skilled

12(20%)

unemployed

1(1.6.6)

housewife

10(16.6%)

Religion

hindu

52(86.6%)

Non hindu

8(13.3%)

Socio economic status

Low

56(93.3%)

middle

4(6.6%)

 

Table 2: Mean, S.D., and t-values of PANSS Scores in Poor Adherence and Good Adherence Groups in Male Patients

PANSS Domain

Adherence Group

N

Mean

S.D.

t-value

p-value

PANSS Positive

Poor adherence

21

6.81

5.53

3.28

.01

 

Good adherence

28

2.25

4.21

PANSS Negative

Poor adherence

21

10.90

8.45

3.98

.01

 

Good adherence

28

3.61

4.10

PANSS General

Poor adherence

21

30.67

6.34

3.30

.01

 

Good adherence

28

25.75

4.10

 

Table 3: Mean, S.D., and t-values of Insight Scale (Total and Domains) in Poor and Good Adherence Groups in Male Patients

Insight Variable

Adherence Group

N

Mean

S.D.

t-value

p-value

ISP Total Score

Poor adherence

21

8.62

3.90

1.40

NS

 

Good adherence

28

10.00

2.76

Symptoms Awareness

Poor adherence

21

2.77

3.07

1.30

NS

 

Good adherence

28

1.97

0.96

Illness Awareness

Poor adherence

21

2.33

1.32

0.62

NS

 

Good adherence

28

2.61

1.69

Need for Treatment

Poor adherence

21

2.71

2.78

0.07

NS

 

Good adherence

28

2.68

0.55

 

Table 4: Mean, S.D., and t-values of Stigma Scores in Poor and Good Adherence Groups in Male Patients

Stigma Domain

Adherence Group

N

Mean

S.D.

t-value

p-value

Stigma Scores – Discrimination

Poor adherence

21

15.86

7.04

0.72

NS

 

Good adherence

28

14.21

8.36

Stigma Scores – Disclosure

Poor adherence

21

19.67

9.97

0.16

NS

 

Good adherence

28

20.18

12.33

Stigma Scores – Positive Aspects

Poor adherence

21

8.86

2.67

2.54

.05

 

Good adherence

28

6.90

2.67

 

Table 5: Mean, S.D., and t-values of Belief of Causation in Poor Adherence and Good Adherence Groups in Male Patients

Belief in Causation

Adherence Group

N

Mean

S.D.

t-value

p-value

Heredity

Poor adherence

21

0.19

0.40

0.49

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.25

0.44

Brain dysfunction

Poor adherence

21

0.39

0.59

0.63

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.50

0.70

Psychosocial stress

Poor adherence

21

0.29

0.56

0.18

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.32

0.77

Personality defect

Poor adherence

21

0.62

0.80

1.34

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.36

0.56

Supernatural cause

Poor adherence

21

0.33

0.48

0.09

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.32

0.48

Fate / God’s will

Poor adherence

21

0.42

0.67

1.07

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.68

0.90

No / Other cause

Poor adherence

21

0.19

0.40

0.82

NS

 

Good adherence

28

0.11

0.31

 

Table:6 Mean, S.D., t-values and p-values of MAST, CAST, Distance from IMHH, No. of Hospitalizations and ASC Total Score in Medication Adherence of Male Patients

Variable

Adherence Group

N

Mean

S.D.

t-value

p-value

MAST Scores

Poor adherence

21

14.43

18.99

3.06

0.01

 

Good adherence

28

2.21

8.13

 

 

CAST Scores

Poor adherence

21

2.00

5.50

0.52

NS

 

Good adherence

28

1.32

3.97

 

 

Distance from IMHH (KM)

Poor adherence

21

116.14

113.64

0.07

NS

 

Good adherence

28

113.89

115.93

 

 

No. of Hospitalizations

Poor adherence

21

1.95

1.86

1.07

NS

 

Good adherence

28

1.46

1.34

 

 

ASC Total Score

Poor adherence

21

3.24

2.34

1.10

NS

 

Good adherence

28

2.53

2.12

 

 

 

Table: 7 Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Male Patients

Measurement / Variable

Group / Category

N

Mean

S.D.

Statistic

p-Value

Distance from IMHH (KM)

Poor adherence

21

116.14

113.64

t = 0.07

NS

 

Good adherence

28

113.89

115.93

 

 

No. of Hospitalizations

Poor adherence

21

1.95

1.86

t = 1.07

NS

 

Good adherence

28

1.46

1.34

 

 

ASC Total Score

Poor adherence

21

3.24

2.34

t = 1.10

NS

 

Good adherence

28

2.53

2.12

 

 

Age and Medication Adherence (Correlation)

MARS Scores

5.93

2.19

r = 0.01

NS

 

Age (years)

34.28

8.91

 

 

Substance Use vs Adherence

No substance

Poor = 10

Good = 23

C = .50

NS

 

Alcohol

Poor = 7

Good = 2

C = .50

.01

 

Cannabis

Poor = 3

Good = 3

C = .50

.01

 

Alcohol + Cannabis

Poor = 1

Good = 0

C = .50

NS

 

Table:8 Association of Prescribed Medicines and Occupation with Medication Adherence in Male Patients

Variable

Category

Poor Adherence

Good Adherence

Contingency Coefficient

p-Value

Prescribed Medicines

HPL

1

1

 

TFP

2

3

 

Olanzapine

1

7

 

Risperidone

3

7

0.33

 

Amisulpride

1

2

NS

 

Quetiapine

0

1

 

Combination therapy

13

13

Interpretation

No significant correlation between prescribed medication and medication adherence in males at any level.

 

 

 

 

Occupation

Unskilled

12

13

 

Semiskilled

8

3

 

Skilled

7

5

0.23

NS

 

Unemployed

1

0

 

TABLE; 9 MEAN, S.D AND t values of PANSS Scores in Poor adherence and Good adherence groups in female Patients.

 

 

N

Mean

SD

T value

P value

PANSS

Positive

Poor adherence

6

8.33

3.88

3.98

.01

Good adherence

5

0.80

1.79

PANSS Negative

 

Poor adherence

6

12.00

5.76

4.15

.01

Good adherence

5

0.80

1.79

PANSS General

Poor adherence

6

27.17

7.94

1.46

NS

Good adherence

5

21.80

2.28

 

Table;10 Comparison of Insight Scores (ISP Scores, Symptoms Awareness, Illness Awareness, and Need for Treatment) Between Poor and Good Medication Adherence Groups in female Patients.


Adherence

N

Mean

S.D

t-value

p-value

 

ISP Scores

Poor

6

8.50

5.28

1.08

NS

 

Good

5

11.20

1.92

 

 

Symptoms Awareness

Poor

6

1.83

1.48

1.21

NS

 

Good

5

2.80

1.10

 

 

Illness Awareness

Poor

6

2.50

1.64

0.86

NS

 

Good

5

3.20

0.84

 

 

Need for Treatment

Poor

6

2.00

1.26

1.33

NS

 

Good

5

2.80

0.45

 

 

 

Table; 11 Mean, S.D., and t-values of stigma scores in poor adherence and good adherence groups in female Patients.

Stigma Domain

Adherence Group

N (Sample Size)

Mean Score

S.D. (Standard Deviation)

t-value

p-value

Stigma Scores-Discrimination

Poor adherence

6

11.83

1.94

0.47

NS

 

Good adherence

5

11.00

3.87

 

 

Stigma Scores-Disclosure

Poor adherence

6

17.00

2.00

1.88

NS

 

Good adherence

5

22.40

6.77

 

 

Stigma Scores-Positive aspects

Poor adherence

6

9.17

4.17

0.26

NS

 

Good adherence

5

8.60

2.51

 

 

 

Table 12 Mean, S.D., and t-values of belief of causation in poor adherence and good adherence group in female Patients.

Belief of Causation Factor

Adherence Group

N (Sample Size)

Mean Score

S.D. (Standard Deviation)

t-value

p-value

Heredity

Poor adherence

6

0.17

0.41

0.90

NS

 

Good adherence

5

0.40

0.55

 

 

Brain dysfunction

Poor adherence

6

0.00

0.00

2.08

NS

 

Good adherence

5

1.40

1.68

 

 

Psychosocial stress

Poor adherence

6

0.17

0.41

1.58

NS

 

Good adherence

5

1.00

1.22

 

 

Personality defects

Poor adherence

6

0.17

0.41

1.16

NS

 

Good adherence

5

1.00

1.73

 

 

Supernatural cause

Poor adherence

6

0.17

0.41

1.65

NS

 

Good adherence

5

0.80

0.84

 

 

Fate/God's will

Poor adherence

6

0.67

1.03

0.93

NS

 

Good adherence

5

1.20

0.84

 

 

None

Poor adherence

6

0.33

0.51

1.43

NS

 

Good adherence

5

0.00

0.00

 

 

 

Table; 13 Analysis of Clinical, Treatment, and Demographic Factors Related to Medication Adherence in Female Patients

Factor

Adherence Group

N (Sample Size)

Mean

S.D. (Standard Deviation)

t-value

p-value

Distance from IMHH in KM

Poor adherence

6

234.0

171.16

1.70

NS

 

Good adherence

5

94.00

69.86

 

 

No. of Hospitalizations

Poor adherence

6

2.00

1.26

1.43

NS

 

Good adherence

5

1.00

1.00

 

 

ASC Total score

Poor adherence

6

2.00

1.67

0.16

NS

 

Good adherence

5

1.80

2.49

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

The present study examined gender differences in medication adherence among patients with schizophrenia and explored the relationship between adherence and multiple clinical, psychosocial, and treatment-related variables. The findings highlight distinct patterns of adherence in male and female patients, consistent with existing literature suggesting that gender significantly influences treatment behavior, clinical presentation, and psychosocial determinants in schizophrenia [1,2].

 

Among male patients, poor adherence was significantly associated with higher PANSS positive, negative, and general psychopathology scores. This aligns with past studies showing that more severe symptoms—particularly negative symptoms—impair motivation, cognitive functioning, and treatment insight, ultimately reducing medication adherence [3,4]. Increased symptom severity also leads to behavioral disorganization and a reduced ability to follow treatment schedules [5]. Our findings support earlier observations that males often present with an earlier onset and more severe course of illness, contributing to poorer functional outcomes and lower adherence rates [6].

 

Insight, although slightly lower in the poor-adherence male group, did not show statistically significant differences. This is consistent with previous reports that the relationship between insight and adherence, though important, is often mediated by other factors including cognitive deficits, substance use, and stigma [7,8]. However, the direction of change—lower insight among poorly adherent males—corroborates earlier evidence that diminished awareness of illness and reduced acceptance of the need for treatment contribute to non-adherence [9].

 

Stigma also demonstrated partial influence. Male patients with poor adherence showed significantly higher scores on the “positive aspects” component of stigma, suggesting a tendency to minimize illness severity or view symptoms as non-problematic. Similar findings have been reported in studies where stigma-related denial interfered with consistent medication intake [10]. However, other stigma subscales did not differ significantly, indicating that stigma may influence adherence indirectly or in combination with other psychosocial constructs.

 

Substance use emerged as a major factor among males. Alcohol use was significantly higher in the poor-adherence group, confirming extensive evidence that substance use disorders strongly predict medication non-adherence due to poor impulse control, chaotic lifestyle, and reduced treatment motivation [11,12]. Alcohol and cannabis use are known to worsen psychotic symptoms, interfere with pharmacological effects, and increase relapse and hospitalization rates [13]. Our findings mirror these patterns, underscoring the need for integrated dual-diagnosis treatment models for male patients.

 

In contrast, female patients showed different adherence patterns. Similar to males, females with poor adherence had significantly higher PANSS positive and negative symptom scores, reaffirming the universal role of symptom severity in predicting adherence regardless of gender. This is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that symptom burden is one of the strongest determinants of medication-taking behavior across settings [14].

 

However, unlike males, insight, stigma, beliefs about causation, and side-effects did not significantly differ between good and poor adherers among females. This could be attributed to smaller sample size or gender-specific resilience factors. Literature suggests that women with schizophrenia often have better insight, stronger social support, and greater treatment engagement compared to men, which may buffer the negative effects of symptom severity on adherence [15,16].

 

An interesting observation was the greater distance from the treatment center among females with poor adherence, a finding consistent with previous Indian studies showing that mobility restrictions, family dependence, and sociocultural barriers disproportionately affect women’s access to mental healthcare [17]. Geographic and logistical barriers can significantly reduce follow-up attendance and medication continuity in female patients, especially in rural settings [18].

 

Beliefs regarding causation of illness did not significantly differ between adherence groups in either gender. However, females tended to attribute illness more to psychosocial stress and biological causes than males, consistent with reports that women have a broader and more flexible understanding of mental illness etiologies [19].

 

Overall, the study highlights that male non-adherence is more strongly associated with substance use and stigma, whereas female non-adherence is more related to access barriers and illness severity. These findings emphasize the importance of gender-sensitive clinical interventions. For males, treatment should include routine substance-use screening, motivational interviewing, and relapse prevention modules. For females, enhancing accessibility, family counselling, and community-based follow-up mechanisms may significantly improve adherence.

 

The study has several strengths including the use of validated scales (PANSS, MARS, ASC, ISP), gender-specific analysis, and assessment of multiple psychosocial variables. However, limitations include the modest sample size, especially among females, the cross-sectional design, and use of purposive sampling, which may limit generalizability. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand temporal patterns of adherence and causal pathways.

 

Despite these limitations, the study meaningfully contributes to the limited Indian literature on gender differences in treatment adherence in schizophrenia and provides actionable insights for clinicians and policymakers.

 

CONCLUSION

This study shows that gender significantly influences medication adherence in schizophrenia. Women generally exhibit better adherence due to stronger insight and social support, while men are more affected by substance use, poorer insight, and negative symptoms. Recognizing these gender-specific factors can help clinicians design targeted, patient-centered interventions to improve adherence and overall treatment outcomes.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Anita Riecher-Rössler. Gender aspects in schizophrenia. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2017;19(4):353–361.
  2. Abel Kathryn M, Drake Richard, Goldstein Jill M. Sex differences in schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):417–428.
  3. Lacro Jonathan P, Dunn Laura B, Dolder Christian R, Leckband Susan G, Jeste Dilip V. Prevalence of and risk factors for medication nonadherence in patients with schizophrenia: a comprehensive review of recent literature. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002;63(10):892–909.
  4. Fenton Wayne S. Depression, negative symptoms, and the course of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;157(3):350–353.
  5. Velligan Dawn I, Bow-Thomas Celeste C, Huntzinger Cynthia D, Ritch John L, Ledbetter Nanci, Miller Alison L. Randomized controlled trial of the use of compensatory strategies to enhance adaptive functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;157(8):1317–1323.
    (Note: Velligan’s major adherence-related work is 2008; however full author lists vary. The above is one of the most cited full-author papers.)
  6. Seeman Mary V. Gender differences in the prescribing of antipsychotic drugs. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1986;9(3):435–446.
  7. Kim Sung-Wan, Kim Seung-Ji, Mun Jeong-Yoon, Park Jong-Yun, Jang Hee-Mun, Lee Jong-Sun, Park Young-Hoon, Lee Jae-Hyun, Yoon Jin-Sang. Psychopathology and insight in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Investigation. 2012;9(3):251–257.
  8. Mintz Arthur R, Dobson Keith S, Romney David M. Insight in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research. 2003;61(1):75–88.
  9. Amador Xavier F, David Anthony S (Editors). Insight and Psychosis: Awareness of Illness in Schizophrenia and Related Disorders. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2004.
  10. Fung Kon Ming, Tsang Hector W.H., Corrigan Patrick W. Self-stigma and medication adherence among people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research. 2008;164(1):46–53.
  11. Green Alan I, Drake Robert E, Brunette Mary F, Noordsy Douglas L. Schizophrenia and co-occurring substance use disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;164(3):402–408.
  12. Becker Hermann, Huxley Peter. Substance misuse in psychosis: a literature review. Psychiatric Bulletin. 1999;23(2):53–56.
  13. Drake Robert E, Mueser Kim T. Psychosocial approaches to dual diagnosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2000;26(1):105–118.
  14. Higashi Keiko, Medic Goran, Littlewood Katia J, Diez Tomas Plácido, Granström Otto, De Hert Marc. Medication adherence in schizophrenia: factors influencing adherence and consequences of non-adherence. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:310.
  15. Cotton Sue M, Lambert Trevor J, Schimmelmann Ben G, Filia Kate, Rayner Victoria, Hides Leanne, Jackson Henry J, McGorry Patrick D, Conus Philippe. Gender differences in premorbid, entry, treatment, and outcome characteristics in a treated epidemiological sample of first-episode psychosis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;43(2):135–143.
  16. Seeman Mary V. Women and schizophrenia: gender influences on symptomatology and course. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1997;20(1):27–47.
  17. Thara R, Kamath Shantha. Women and schizophrenia in India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2015;57(Suppl 2):S246–S251.
  18. Gururaj Girish, Varghese Mathew, Benegal Vivek, Rao Gayatri N, Pathak Kavita, Singh Lalit Kumar, Mehta Ryali, Ram Dhanasekaran, Shibukumar Thara, Kokane A, et al. National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015–16: Summary. National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru; 2016.
  19. Kurihara Takashi, Kato Mami, Reverger Randy, Tirta Ila G.K. Beliefs about causes of mental illness among communities in Bali: a transcultural study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2000;54(4):395–399.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Clinical Profile of Dry Eye Disease Among Postmenopausal Women Visiting a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 2253-2260
Research Article Open Access
A Retrospective Institutional Study with Emphasis on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pleomorphic Adenoma
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 2634-2642
Research Article Open Access
Predictors of Anastomotic Leak After Intestinal Resection and Anastomosis: A Prospective Observational Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue 6 : 2371-2381
Research Article Open Access
Association of VDR Gene Polymorphisms (Foki and Bsml) with Vitamin D status and susceptibility to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 5022-5033
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 4
Citations
3 Views
3 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved