International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1397-1410
Research Article
Diagnostic Profile of Central Nervous System Tumours: Histopathological Insights from A Tertiary Care Hospital
 ,
 ,
Received
June 25, 2026
Accepted
July 2, 2026
Published
July 17, 2026
Abstract

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) tumours are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with variable clinical behaviour, prognosis, and treatment responses. Despite advances in radiological techniques, histopathology remains the gold standard for diagnosis and classification, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Aim & Objectives:  To study the histopathological spectrum of CNS tumours and correlate findings with clinical and radiological data.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over 18 months at a Tertiary Care Hospital, involving 88 surgically resected CNS tumours. Specimens were processed using standard histopathological techniques and classified per WHO CNS Tumour Classification, 5th Edition (2021). Clinical and radiological data were analysed for correlation.

Results: Patients ranged from 2 to 76 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1. The most affected age group was 41–50 years. Neuroepithelial tumours (51.1%) were most common, followed by meningothelial tumours (33%). Astrocytomas were the predominant subtype. WHO Grade I tumours were most frequent. Histopathological and radiological correlation was observed in 88.6% of cases.

Conclusion: Histopathological examination, integrated with clinical and radiological findings, is essential for accurate CNS tumour diagnosis and grading. It remains the cornerstone of diagnosis in settings with limited access to molecular testing.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

The first documented case of a fungal tumour involving the dura mater was reported by Louis in 1774. Since then, space-occupying lesions in the cerebral cavity have become well understood(1). Historically, CNS tumours were considered rare in India, but advancements in diagnostic technologies have revealed that their prevalence is comparable to global rates(2).

 

CNS tumours are a diverse group of neoplasms, both benign and malignant, originating from various neural cell types such as glial cells, neurons, or meningeal cells. These tumours exhibit significant variation in clinical and histological features. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the incidence of CNS tumours is 9.9 per 100,000 in developing countries and 6.3 per 100,000 in developed nations(3). In India, CNS tumours account for 1.9% of all cancers, with 60–80% being primary and 20–40% metastatic(4,5).

 

Tumour location significantly impacts prognosis. In children, ~70% of CNS tumours occur in the posterior fossa, whereas in adults, most are found in the cerebral hemispheres(6). A bimodal age distribution is observed, peaking in childhood and between 45–70 years(7). In India, incidence rates are 1.5/100,000/year in males and 0.7/100,000/year in females(8).

 

Risk factors include genetic mutations and prior ionizing radiation exposure (e.g., X-rays, CT scans), though these account for <10% of cases. Recently, IARC classified low-frequency electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones as a possible carcinogen, linked to gliomas, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas(9).

 

Tumours of the central nervous system are histologically typed by WHO as tumours of neuroepithelial tissue, meninges, embryonal tumours, tumours of sellar region, haematolymphoid tumours, germ cell tumours and metastatic tumours. Accurate histological identification, including use of histochemical stains and immunohistochemistry, is critical for diagnosis, grading, and prognosis(10).

 

Although molecular diagnostics offer enhanced prognostic capabilities, their cost and limited availability make histopathology the primary diagnostic tool in many developing regions(11).

 

A comprehensive evaluation—incorporating clinical, radiological, histological, and immunohistochemical findings—is essential. Even benign tumours may be life-threatening due to their location, mass effect, and potential for malignant transformation, underscoring the importance of early and accurate diagnosis(12,13).

 

AIM:

To study histopathological findings in patients with central nervous system tumours at a tertiary care hospital.

 

OBECTIVES:

  1. To determine distribution of cases depending in age and gender of patient.
  2. To identify different histologic types of central nervous system tumours.
  3. To determine clinical and radiological correlation of central nervous system tumours with histopathological spectrum.

 

MATERIALS & METHODS:

Study Design: Cross Sectional Study.

Study Setting: Study was carried out at Pathology department of Dr. Panjabrao Alias Bhausaheb Deshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati.

Study Population: All the patients diagnosed with CNS tumours.

Sample Size: All the patients at our tertiary care hospital meeting inclusion criteria coming in study duration were included in the sample. The sample size calculated was 88.

Sampling Technique: Convenience sampling method.

Study Duration: 18 Months.

Data Collection Procedure:- The study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at Dr. Panjabrao Alias Bhausaheb Deshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati, following approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Operated specimens of central nervous system (CNS) tumours were received from the Department of Neurosurgery. For each case, accompanying clinical details, operative findings, and radiological reports were obtained to support histopathological evaluation. The CNS tumour specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, and gross morphological features were recorded.

 

All specimens were processed using standard paraffin embedding techniques. Sections were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) for histopathological examination. The tumours were classified and graded based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of CNS Tumours, 5th Edition (2021), considering features such as increased cellularity, nuclear atypia, mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, and necrosis.

 

Inclusion Criteria:- Tissues from patients of all age groups diagnosed with central nervous system neoplasms, who underwent surgical intervention followed by histopathological analysis, were included in this study.

 

Exclusion Criteria:- 1. Non-neoplastic lesions 2. Inadequate biopsy, 3. Inflammatory lesions.

 

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 88 cases of central nervous system tumours were received in the department of Pathology for histopathological examination at Dr. Panjabrao Alias Bhausaheb Deshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati.

 

In the present study, the patients’ age ranged from 02 to 76 years with a mean age of 45.26 years. The most common age group was 41-50 years (33%) followed by 51-60 years (19.3%).

 

Table no 1: Distribution of Cases Depending on Age Groups:

Age Groups

Frequency

Percentage

0-10 Years

05

5.7%

11-20 Years

05

5.7%

21-30 Years

06

6.8%

31-40 Years

12

13.6%

41-50 Years

29

33.0%

51-60 Years

17

19.3%

61-70 Years

10

11.4%

>70 Years

04

4.5%

Total

88

100%

 

Chart no. 1: Distribution of Cases Depending on Age Groups:

 

Distribution of cases depending on Gender:

Out of total 88 patients, 48 (54.5%) patients were males and 40 (45.5%) patients were females with M:F ratio of 1.2:1.

 

Chart no.2: Distribution of cases depending on Gender:

 

Table no.2: Distribution of cases depending on Clinical Features:

Clinical Features

Yes

No

Headache

47 (53.4%)

41 (46.6%)

Seizures

29 (33.0%)

59 (67.0%)

Motor weakness

28 (31.8%)

60 (68.2%)

Sensory Disturbances

16 (18.2%)

72 (81.8%)

Backache

16 (18.2%)

72 (81.8%)

Vomiting

12 (13.6%)

76 (86.4%)

Giddiness

6 (6.8%)

82 (93.2%)

Headache was the most common symptom seen in 53.4% of total patients followed by seizures seen in 33% of total patients.

 

Table no.3: Distribution of cases depending on Site of Tumour:

LOCATION OF TUMOUR

No.

Percentage

Supratentorial

 

 

Cerebral

Frontal

Parietal

Temporal

Occipital

Multilobe

58

26

05

04

01

22

65.91%

29.55%

5.68%

4.55%

1.14%

25%

Ventricular

02

2.27%

Sellar and Suprasellar

03

3.41%

Thalamus

01

1.14%

Infratentorial

 

 

Cerebellum

05

5.68%

Spinal

19

21.59%

Supratentorial tumours were more than infratentorial tumours. CNS tumours in this study were most frequently found in the cerebrum comprising of 58 cases (65.91%) out of which 26 (29.55%) of them were located in frontal lobe and 22 (25%) had multilobe involvement.

 

Table no. 4: Distribution of the cases depending on 'Histopathological Diagnosis':

Histopathological Diagnosis

Frequency

Percentage

Neuroepithelial Tumours

(Gliomas and Ependymal Tumours)

45

51.1%

Meningothelial Tumours

29

33.0%

Embryonal Tumours

04

4.5%

Tumours of Sellar Region

03

3.4%

Hematolymphoid Tumour (NHL)

01

1.1%

Metastasis

06

6.8%

Total

88

 

Amongst the primary tumours, the tumours of neuroepithelial origin (51.1%) were the most common followed by meningothelial tumours (33%) and embryonal tumours (4.5%). 

 

Chart no.3: Distribution of the cases depending on 'Histopathological Diagnosis':

 

Distribution of neuroepithelial tumours:

Out of 45 neuroepithelial tumours, astrocytomas (32 cases, 71.11%) were the most common tumours followed by Ependymal tumours (8 cases, 17.78%). Astrocytic tumours included pilocytic astrocytomas (2 cases), astrocytomas grades 2,3,4 tumours (18 cases) and glioblatoma multiforme (12 cases).

 

Table no. 5: Distribution of meningothelial tumours:

Histopathological type of Meningioma

No. of Cases

Percentage

Transitional

17

58.62%

Fibrous

07

24.14%

Psammomatous

04

13.79%

Meningothelial

01

3.45%

Total

29

100%

Among meningothelial tumours, transitional meningiomas (58.62%) were most common followed by fibrous meningiomas (24.14%).

 

Table no. 6: Distribution of CNS tumours depending on WHO grading:

WHO grade

Number of cases

Percentage

I

31

39.7%

II

21

26.9%

III

07

9%

IV

19

24.4%

Total

78

 

According to WHO 2021 classification, 78 primary tumours were graded. Most of the tumours belonged to grade 1 (39.7%) followed by grade 2 (26.9%) and grade 4 (24.4%).

 

Table no. 7: Distribution of histological types of CNS tumours depending on age groups:

 

AGE GROUPS

HISTOLOGICAL TYPE

0-10 YEARS

11-20 YEARS

21-30 YEARS

31-40 YEARS

41-50 YEARS

51-60 YEARS

>60 YEARS

TOTAL

Pilocytic Astrocytoma

01

01

-

-

-

-

-

02

Astrocytoma (Grade 2,3,4)

01

02

01

06

11

06

03

30

Oligodendroglioma

-

-

02

01

01

01

-

05

Ependymal tumours

01

-

02

01

03

01

-

08

Meningioma

-

-

01

03

13

07

06

29

Medulloblastoma

02

02

-

-

-

-

 

04

Pituitary Macroadenoma

-

-

-

-

-

01

02

03

NHL

-

-

-

-

-

-

01

01

Metastasis

-

-

-

01

01

01

03

06

TOTAL

05

05

06

12

29

17

14

88

 

Astrocytoma and meningioma were seen mostly in 41-50 years age group whereas medulloblastoma was seen in children below 20 years. Metastatic tumours were seen mainly above 60 years of age group.

 

To test correlation between distribution of CNS tumours and age, chi square and p value were calculated. p value was 0.001 which is less than 0.05. This indicates that there is significant difference observed in the distribution of CNS tumours according to age.

 

Table no 8: Distribution of histological types of CNS tumours depending on Gender:

HISTOLOGICAL TYPE

MALE

FEMALE

TOTAL

Neuroepithelial tumours

 

Pilocytic Astrocytoma

 

Astrocytoma Grade 2,3,4

 

Oligodendroglioma

 

Ependymal tumours

28 (31.8%)

 

01

 

23

 

01

 

03

17 (19.3%)

 

01

 

07

 

04

 

05

45 (51.14%)

 

02 (4.4%)

 

30 (66.7%)

 

05 (11.1%)

 

08 (17.8%)

Meningothelial tumours

13 (14.8%)

16 (18.2%)

29 (32.95%)

Embryonal tumours

02 (2.3%)

02 (2.3%)

04 (4.55%)

Tumours of Sellar region

02 (2.3%)

01 (1.1%)

03 (3.41%)

Haematolymphoid tumours(NHL)

-

01 (1.1%)

01 (1.14%)

Metastatic tumours

03 (3.4%)

03 (3.4%)

06 (6.81%)

TOTAL

48 (54.5%)

40 (45.5%)

88 (100%)

 

Neuroepithelial tumours were commonly seen in males (31.8%) whereas meningiomas were common in females (18.2%). Among the neuroepithelial tumours, astrocytomas were most commonly found in males.

 

Distribution of histological types of CNS tumours depending on Site of tumour:

Neuroepithelial tumours were most commonly encountered in cerebrum consisting of 33 cases out of which 14 of them were located in frontal lobe followed by multiple lobe involvement (12 cases).

 

2nd most common meningothelial tumours also were most frequently found in cerebrum consisting of 20 cases out of which 10 cases were located in frontal lobe followed by multiple lobe involvement (7 cases).

 

Table no. 9 : Correlation of histopathological diagnosis of CNS tumours with Radiological Diagnosis:

CNS TUMOURS

Number

Correlated with Radiology

Did not correlate with Radiology

Overall correlation percentage

Neuroepithelial tumours

45

38

07

84.4%

Meningothelial tumours

29

28

01

96.6%

Embryonal tumours

04

03

01

75%

Tumours of sellar region (Pituitary adenoma)

03

03

00

100%

Haematolymphoid tumours (NHL)

01

01

00

100%

Metastasis

06

05

01

83.3%

Total

88

78

10

88.6%

Tumours of sellar region (Pituitary adenoma) and Haematolymphoid tumours (NHL) showed 100% correlation between histopathology and radiology, while, neuroepithelial tumours, meningothelial tumours, embryonal tumours and metastatic tumours showed 84.4%, 96.6%, 75% and 83.3% correlation between histopathology and radiology respectively.

 

To test the association between radiological and histopathological diagnosis, p value was calculated which came out to be 0.8684. The test statistics χ2 equals 1.8585, which is in the 95% region of acceptance. The observed effect size phi is small, 0.15. This indicates that there is no significant difference observed in histopathological and radiological diagnosis of CNS tumours which signifies that diagnosis of CNS tumours identified by histopathological and radiological evaluation is same.

 

IMAGES:

 

Figure no. 1: Astrocytoma with Gemestocytic change showing dense eosinophilic cytoplasm and eccentrically displaced nucleus.

 

Figure no.2: Astrocytoma grade 2 showing diffusely infiltrating tumour cells with round to oval astrocytic nuclei and fibrillar glial processes.

 

Figure no. 3: Oligodendroglioma showing chicken wire like blood vessels and fried egg appearance.

 

Figure no. 4: Glioblastoma multiforme showing microvascular proliferation and glomeruloid bodies.

 

Figure no.5: Ependymoma showing pseudorosettes and true ependymal rosettes.

 

Figure no.6: Medulloblastoma showing syncytial arrangement of densely packed undifferentiated cells.

 

Figure no. 7: Meningothelial meningioma showing meningothelial whorls.

 

Figure no. 8: Transitional meningioma showing mixed meningothelial and fibroblastic features.

 

Figure no. 9: Fibrous meningioma showing monomorphic elongated cells and spindly nuclei

 

Figure no. 10: Psammomatous meningioma showing numerous psammoma bodies.

 

Figure no. 11: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma showing diffuse sheets of medium sized atypical large lymphoid cells.

 

Figure no. 12: Pituitary adenoma showing monomorphic round to polygonal cells arranged in sheets, nests separated by delicate fibrovascular stroma with nuclei showing finely stippled chromatin.

 

Figure no. 13: Metastatic adenocarcinoma showing brain parenchyma infiltrated by malignant epithelial cells arranged in glands with pleomorphic hyperchromatic nuclei, moderate cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli.

 

DISCUSSION

The present study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care hospital and included 88 cases of central nervous system (CNS) tumours submitted for histopathological examination. The cases were analyzed with respect to age, gender, tumour location, clinical presentation, radiological findings, and histopathological diagnosis.

 

In the present study, the highest incidence of CNS tumors was observed in the 41–50 years age group (33%), followed by the 51–60 years age group (19.3%). Similar findings were reported by Pidakala et al(14), who observed the highest frequency of cases in the 41–50 years age group (26.08%), and Kanthikar et al(15), who reported 36.8% of cases in the same age group. In contrast, Hamdani et al(16) reported the highest incidence among patients aged 51–60 years.

 

A male predominance was noted in the present study, which is consistent with the findings of Sen et al (17) (59.5%), Mondal et al(18) (56.2%), and Nibhoria et al(19) (55%). However, Kanthikar et al(15) reported a female predominance, accounting for 52.64% of cases.

 

Headache was the most common presenting symptom, observed in 47 cases (53.4%), followed by seizures in 29 cases (33%). Similar observations were made by Kadaru et al(20), who reported headache (39 Cases, 44.8%) and seizures (19 Cases, 21.8%) as the most common symptoms. Mondal et al(18) also identified headache (63 Cases, 48.46%) and seizures (48 Cases, 36.92%) as the predominant clinical manifestations. Likewise, Shashidhar et al(21) reported headache (42%) and difficulty in movement (31%) as the most frequent symptoms, whereas Vodithala et al(22) observed headache (65%) and vomiting (22.5%) as the leading clinical presentations.

 

In our study, frontal lobe (29.55%) involvement was the most frequent which presented the similar behaviour in the studies conducted by Thambi et al(8) and Sen et al(17) in which the frontal lobe was most frequently involved. In the study done by Kadaru et al(20), most of the CNS tumours were located in the frontal lobe (39.08%) followed by multilobe (27.13%) involvement which is in agreement with the present study.

 

Table no. 10: Distribution of histologic types of CNS tumours in other studies:

Histological type

Present study

Gunge et al(10)

Muddha et al(23)

Mondal et al(18)

Shashidhar et al(21)

Kanthikar et al(15)

Neuroepithelial tumours (Gliomas and Ependymal)

51.1% (45 cases)

57% (20 cases)

54.6% (36 cases)

70.76%

(92 Cases)

41% (41 Cases)

42% (13 cases)

Meningothelial tumours

33% (29 cases)

20% (7 cases)

34.9% (23 cases)

15.3%

(20 Cases)

18% (18  Cases)

48.4% (15 cases)

Embryonal tumours (Medulloblastoma)

4.5% (4 cases)

8.6% (3 cases)

4.5% (3 cases)

-

 

 

-

-

Tumours of sellar region (Pituitary adeoma)

3.4% (3 cases)

2.9% (1 case)

3% (2 cases)

3.83% (5 Cases)

 

6% (6 Cases)

3.2% (1 case)

Haematolymphoid tumours (NHL)

1.1% (1 case)

2.9% (1 case)

-

0.76%

(1 Case)

4% (4 Cases)

 

-

Metastatic tumours

6.8% (6 cases)

5.7% (2 cases)

-

1.53% (2 Cases)

6% (6 Cases)

6.5% (2 cases)

 

Out of total 88 cases of CNS tumours, 82 (93.2%) cases were primary CNS tumours and 06 (6.8%) cases were metastatic. Similar results were seen in the study conducted by Gunge et al(10) in which primary CNS tumour cases were 36 (94.7%) and 02 cases (5.3%) were metastatic.

 

Histologically, neuroepithelial tumours constituted the largest group, accounting for 51.1% of cases, followed by meningothelial tumours, which comprised 33% of cases. These findings are consistent with those reported by Gunge et al(10), who found neuroepithelial tumours in 57% of cases and meningeal tumours in 20%. Similarly, Muddha et al(23) reported gliomas as the most common CNS tumours (54.6%), followed by meningiomas (34.9%). Comparable observations were made by Mondal et al(18) and Shashidhar et al(21). In contrast, Kanthikar et al(15) reported meningothelial tumours as the most common category (48.4%), followed by neuroepithelial tumours (42%).

 

In the present study, out of 45 cases of neuroepithelial tumours, 32 cases (71.11%) were reported as astrocytomas. Among the astrocytic tumours, the most common type was glioblastoma multiforme constituting total 12 cases (37.5%). In the study conducted by Muddha et al(23), glioblastoma was the most common type  among the gliomas accounting for 14 cases (38.9% of gliomas) which is in agreement with the present study data. Also, in the study conducted by Kinkhede et al(24), glioblastomas were the most common type in gliomas comprising 51 cases (41.1%).

 

In our study, the second most common CNS tumours were the meningothelial tumours constituting total 29 cases (32.95%) out of which 17 cases (58.62%) were diagnosed as transitional meningiomas, 7 cases (24.14%) as fibrous meningiomas, 4 cases (13.79%) as psammomatous meningiomas and 1 case (3.45%) as meningothelial meningioma. Similarly, in the study conducted by Poonia et al(25), transitional meningiomas were the most common type among other meningiomas constituting 10 cases (32.3%) followed by meningothelial and fibrous types. Also in the study done by Gadgil et al(26), transitional meningiomas were common followed by meningothelial (22.7%) and fibroblastic (22%) types. In contrast, the study conducted by Kadaru et al(20) showed meningothelial meningioma (51.61%) to be the commonest followed by fibrous meningioma (16.12%) among the meningothelial tumours.

 

According to WHO grading, Grade I tumours were the most common, accounting for 39.7% of cases, followed by Grade II tumours (26.9%). These findings are in accordance with the studies conducted by Amipara et al(27) (41.95%). and Kakshapati et al(28) (55%), both of whom reported Grade I tumours as the most prevalent category.

 

In our study, astrocytomas and meningiomas were commonly seen in the age group of 41-50 years. In Pidakala et al(14) meningiomas and glioblastomas were mostly seen in 41-50 years age group whereas in Kanthikar et al(15), astrocytomas and meningiomas were mostly seen in 41-50 years age group. Embryonal tumours (4.5%) were seen in children. Ramanavarapu et al(29) also found 4 cases (5.88%) of medulloblastomas in 2nd decades of age with minimum of 11 years old.

 

Neuroepithelial tumours were commonly seen in males in the present study. Amongst the neuroepithelial tumours, astrocytomas were commonly seen in males. Similarly, in the study conducted by Mehta et al(30), tumours of neuroepithelial origin were commonly seen in males. Ghanghoria S et al(31) also found the incidence of astrocytomas more in males than in females. However, in meningiomas, females outnumbered the males in our study. A similar female preponderance was seen in meningiomas in the studies conducted by Mehta et al(30), Ghanghoria et al(31) and Mohammad et al(32).

 

In the present study, Tumours of sellar region (Pituitary adenoma) and Haematolymphoid tumours (NHL) showed 100% correlation between histopathology and radiology, while, neuroepithelial tumours, meningothelial tumours, embryonal tumours and metastatic tumours showed 84.4%, 96.6%, 75% and 83.3% correlation between histopathology and radiology respectively. Thus, the histopathological diagnosis of CNS tumours correlates with the radiological diagnosis. Similarly, in the study done by Boni et al(33), tumours of sellar region and metastatic tumours showed 100% radiology correlation with histopathology while neuroepithelial tumours and Meningeal tumours showed 88.57%, 84.44% correlation.

 

Overall, the findings of the present study are comparable with those reported in the existing literature and highlight the importance of histopathological examination as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of CNS tumours. Furthermore, the high degree of radiological-histopathological concordance underscores the value of neuroimaging in the diagnostic workup of these lesions.

 

CONCLUSION

Accurate diagnosis of CNS tumours is essential due to their varied behaviour, prognosis, and treatment options. While imaging has advanced, histopathology remains the gold standard, supported by clinical and radiological correlation.

 

The integration of histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular data ensures precise classification and guides effective management. Ongoing advancements in these fields continue to enhance prognostication and support personalized treatment, ultimately improving outcomes for CNS tumour patients.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. V Rathod, A Bhole, M Chauhan, H Ramteke, B Wani. Study of clinico-radiological and clinico-pathological correlation of intracranial space occupying lesion at rural center. The Internet Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009 Volume 7 Number 1.
  2. Shah HK, Dongre S, Karle R. Histomorphological spectrum of central nervous system lesions in a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2022 Jan;10(1):86.
  3. Omon HE, Komolafe EO, Olasode BJ, Ogunbameru R, Adefidipe AA, Anele CO, Balogun SA, Ajekwu TO. Clinicopathological Profile of Central Nervous System Tumours in a Tertiary Hospital in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of West African College of Surgeons. 2021 Jul 1;11(3):1-5.
  4. Joshi H, Awasthi S, Dutta S, Bhardwaj R. Histopathological spectrum of central nervous system lesions. Trop J Path Micro. 2019;5(11):844-49.
  5. Dhar R, Bhemat D. Clinicopathological correlation of CNS tumours. International Journal of Research and Review. 2019; 6(3):181-187.
  6. Jat KC, Vyas SP, Bihari NA, Mehra K. Central nervous system tumours: A histopathological study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016 May;4(5):1539-45.
  7. Naik S, Sahoo N, Mohanty B, Lenka A, Das AS, Dash P. Histopathological spectrum of central nervous system lesions in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2021;8:1038-41.
  8. Thambi R, Kandamuthan S, Vilasiniamma L, Abraham TR, Balakrishnan PK. Histopathological analysis of brain tumours-a seven year study from a tertiary care centre in South India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017 Jun;11(6):EC05.
  9. Bhattacharya S, Maiti B, Konar K. Histopathological profile of central nervous system tumours in a peripheral tertiary care centre of West Bengal. Journal of Laboratory Physicians. 2023 Mar;15(01):038-44.
  10. Gunge RA, Munemane A, Karle RR. Histopathological overview of CNS tumors at a tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; Diagnostic Specialty Issue, June 2018: Vol.-7, Issue- 3, P. 86 – 99.
  11. Anvari K, Bahadorkhan G, Samini F, Izadpanahi P, Bayatmokhtari N, Javadinia SA. Pathological diagnostic pitfalls in the verification of brain tumours; can imaging lead to pathology alternation?. Reports of Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2015 Dec 31;2(4).
  12. Shetty JK, Prasad KH, Shruthi S, Raghothaman A. Challenges in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Brain Tumours: An Institutional Experience in a Series of Cases. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 2022 Oct;12(04):412-6.
  13. Stoyanov GS, Petkova L, Dzhenkov DL. A practical approach to the differential diagnosis of intracranial tumours: gross, histology, and immunoprofile-based algorithm. Cureus. 2019 Dec;11(12).
  14. Pidakala P, Inuganti RV, Boregowda C, Mathi A, Lakhineni S. A five-year histopathological review of CNS tumours in a tertiary centre with emphasis on diagnostic aspects of uncommon tumours. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2016;3(51):2605-12.
  15. Kanthikar SN, Nikumbh DB, Dravid NV. Histopathological overview of central nervous system tumours in North Maharashtra, India: a single center study. Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology. 2017 Jan;4(1):80-4.
  16. Hamdani SM, Dar NQ, Reshi R. Histopathological spectrum of brain tumours: A 4-year retrospective study from a single tertiary care facility. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2019;8(8):673-676.
  17. Sen D, Sarkar P, Banerjee A, Datta A. Histopathological Spectrum of CNS Tumours: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Centre of North-East India. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. (2022), 6(3): 1-6.
  18. Mondal S, Pradhan R, Pal S, Biswas B, Banerjee A, Bhattacharyya D. Clinicopathological pattern of brain tumours: A 3-year study in a tertiary care hospital in India. Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal. 2016;5(5-2016):437-40.
  19. Nibhoria S, Tiwana KK, Phutela R, Bajaj A, Chhabra S. Histopathological spectrum of central nervous system tumours: A single centre study of 100 cases. International journal of scientific study. 2015;3(6):130-4.
  20. Kadaru MR. Clinicopathological study of central nervous system tumours. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2019 Jul;6(3):393-99.
  21. Shashidhar SN, Teerthanath T. Clinicopathological study of central nervous system tumours. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2017 Jun;6(3):361-70.
  22. Vodithala S, Bhardwaj T, Vagha S. Spectrum Of Histomorpholological Patterns Of Meningioma At A Tertiary Health Centre. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2022 13(Special Issue 3):1097.
  23. Muddha SS, Anbumozhi MK, Gali V. A clinic pathological study of primary intracranial neoplasms in a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2),5818-5830.
  24. Kinkhede DS, Meshram SA, Parate SN, Kumbhalkar DT, Tathe SP, Randale AA. Histomorphological spectrum of intracranial space occupying lesions: Experience at tertiary care centre. Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology. 2023 Jan 18;8(4):485-91.
  25. Poonia S, Singh K, Kaur A, Madhukar M, Kaur D, Godara R. Histopathological spectrum of CNS Tumours among rural population - A single centre experience. Int J Health Clin Res. 2021;4(1):25-29.
  26. Gadgil NM, Margam SR, Chaudhari CS, Kumavat PV. The histopathological spectrum of meningeal neoplasms. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2016 Jul;3(3):432-6
  27. Amipara MG, Shah AM, Shah S, Goswami H. Histomorphological approach of central nervous system (CNS) tumours: A retrospective study at a tertiary teaching care center. Int J Clin Diagn Pathol. 2024;7(2):33-38.
  28. Kakshapati T, Basnet RB, Pant B, Gautam D. Histopathological analysis of central nervous system tumour; an observational study. Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2018 Sep 6;8(2):1393-8.
  29. Ramanavarapu S, Parvatala A, Vajrala SK. A histopathological study of central nervous system primary neoplasms. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2019 Aug;18(8):15 19.
  30. Mehta J, Bansal B, Mittal A, Mathur K, Vijay R. Histological analysis of primary brain tumours in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective study of 5 years. Int J Med Res Prof. 2017 Sep;3(5):14-8.
  31. Ghanghoria S, Mehar R, Kulkarni CV, Mittal M, Yadav A, Patidar H. Retrospective histological analysis of CNS tumours–A 5 year study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014 Oct 1;3(10):1205-7.
  32. Mohammed A, Hamdan A, Homoud A. Histopathological profile of brain tumours: a 12-year retrospective study from Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2019 Dec;14(04):1106-11.
  33. Boni LS, Kondapalli M, Kotni VS, Botta VS, Prasad U, Atla B. Clinico pathological and radiological correlation of CNS tumours along with role of Ki 67 proliferative index in grading Astrocytoma and Meningiomas. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019 Aug;7:3032-8.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
To Evaluate Quality of Life and Psychological Changes in Post-TB Lung Disease Patients Attending A Tertiary Health Care Centre
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1390-1396
Research Article Open Access
Clinical Spectrum, Antibiotic Sensitivity, and Clinical Outcome of Urinary Tract Infection in the Pediatric Age Group: A Cross-Sectional Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1383-1389
Research Article Open Access
Correlation Between Lumbar Lordosis, Vertebral Canal Dimensions, and Functional Disability in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Radiological Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1411-1418
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Study of Functional Outcome Between Two Crossed K-wire Fixation Versus Two Lateral Divergent K-wire Fixation in Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1283-1287
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 4
Citations
3 Views
2 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved