International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1566-1574
Research Article
Consequence of periodontal therapy on unfavorable birth outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
 ,
Received
Aug. 6, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 25, 2025
Published
Oct. 20, 2025
Abstract

Introduction: Unfavorable birth outcomes –Low Birth Weight (LBW), Preterm Birth (PTB) and Preterm Low Birth Weight (PTLBW) negatively impact health of mother and babies and also leads to developmental complications later in life. Among the etiological factors, infection and inflammation have gained important consideration. Purpose of present systematic review with meta-analysis is evaluation of impact that periodontal therapy exerts on unfavorable birth outcomes.

Material and methods: Electronic databases searched for the relevant articles- PubMed, Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Outcome variables considered – PTB, LBW and PTLBW. Meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan software. Risk ratio (RR) for each variable was utilized to present measures of effect.

Results: Ten researches were chosen for systematic review with meta-analysis. Results demonstrated no difference in risk of PTB(RR = 0.88; CI:0.69 to1.13; p =0.32), LBW(RR = 0.81;CI:0.56 to1.17; p = 0.002) and PTLBW (RR = 0.55;CI:0.22to1.36;p = 0.010) between treatment group and control group.

Conclusion: Present systematic review & meta-analysis demonstrated that non-surgical periodontal therapy does not decrease risk of unfavorable birth outcomes in pregnancy.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Unfavorable birth outcomes - Low Birth Weight (LBW), Preterm Birth(PTB) and Preterm Low Birth Weight(PTLBW) in addition to negatively impacting maternal and new born health also puts an additional economic burden on the families.1,2  PTB - babies born before completion of 37 weeks of gestation, LBW-weight at birth of less than 2500 grams, PTLBW- babies born less than 37 weeks with < 2.5 kg weight.

 

PTB accounts for 28% of neonatal mortality3 and development of neurological, behavioral problems, metabolic complications later in life.4 Various etiological factors involved in development of PTB and LBW includes- maternal age, smoking, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, stress, nutritional deficiencies, hypertension, infection etc.5-8 Infection and inflammation have received a considerable recognition in the recent years. Researches have shown relationship of periodontal disease with unfavorable birth outcomes. 9,10

 

Proposed mechanism of periodontal disease causing unfavorable birth outcomes involves periodontal microorganisms, their by-products and inflammatory mediators.11 Rise in female sex hormones in pregnancy increases permeability of blood vessels due to which pathogens of periodontal origin and their byproducts can transfer from infected periodontal tissue though blood into feto-placental unit. This can also activate inflammatory reactions in feto-placental unit leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes.11 Therefore, researchers have explored result of periodontal therapy on birth outcomes. Present systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate consequence of periodontal therapy on unfavorable birth outcomes.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Focused question:

To develop focused question PICO (patient, intervention, comparison and outcomes) framework was used. “In pregnant patients with periodontitis what is consequence of periodontal therapy on unfavorable birth outcomes in terms of PTB, LBW and PTLBW.” Present review was carried according to PRISMA guidelines- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 12

 

Eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Randomized clinical trials.
  • Studies including non-surgical periodontal treatment.
  • Researches published in English language.
  • Studies including human trials.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Case series, case reports, non-randomized clinical trials.
  • Animal studies.
  • Researches including surgical periodontal treatment.
  • Studies not published in English language.

 

Outcome variables:

Outcome variables included are PTB, LBW and PTLBW. Reviewers independently extracted data – name of author, publication year, sample size, age, PTB, LBW, PTLBW and outcome.

Search strategy:

PubMed, Cochrane, Google scholar databases were searched till July 2025 for present review. References of selected studies were also explored.

PubMed:

"periodontal disease"[TITLE/ABSTRACT] OR "periodontal diseases"[MeSH] OR "chronic periodontitis"[MeSH] AND "periodontal treatment"[TITLE/ABSTRACT] OR "periodontal debridement"[MeSH] OR "Dental Scaling"[Mesh] OR "Root Planing"[Mesh] AND "infant, low birth weight"[MeSH] OR "premature birth"[MeSH]

Cochrane

“periodontal diseases”[MeSH] OR “chronic periodontitis”[MeSH] AND “periodontal treatment”[ti,ab,kw] OR "periodontal debridement"[MeSH] OR "Dental Scaling"[Mesh] OR "Root Planing"[Mesh] AND "infant, low birth weight"[MeSH] OR "premature birth"[MeSH] OR “low birth weight”[ti,ab,kw] OR “preterm birth”[ti,ab,kw]

Google scholar

"chronic periodontitis "AND "effect" AND "periodontal treatment" OR "non-surgical periodontal treatment" OR "periodontal therapy" AND "low birth weight" OR "preterm birth" OR "preterm low birth weight"

 

Screening and study selection:

Reviewers (AK & CY) evaluated titles and abstract of the selected studies. Full text of screened studies was assessed in accordance to eligibility criteria. Discussion was done to settle disagreement among the reviewers. Figure 1 shows PRISMA flowchart for study screening and selection.

 

Risk of bias:

Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessment of risk of bias in randomised trials13 was utilised for quality evaluation of selected studies, judging following domains-1)Sequence generation, 2)Allocation concealment, 3)Blinding of participants and personnels, 4)Blinding of outcome assessment, 5)Incomplete outcome data, 6)Selective outcome reporting, and 7)other sources of bias.

 

 

Statistical analysis:

Meta-analysis was carried out by RevMan software. Heterogenicity was calculated by I2 value based on which fixed or random effect model was selected. Risk ratio (RR) for each outcome variable – PTB, LBW and PTLW at 95%Confidence interval(CI) was utilized to present measures of effect.

 

Electronic database search in PubMed, Cochrane database and Google Scholar provided 1557 articles. 1516 articles were left after removal of duplicates. Full text assessment of 25 articles was done after screening of titles and abstract. Finally, ten studies were chosen for systematic review & meta-analyses. Characteristics of selected studies are shown in Table 1.

 

Table 1. General characteristics of selected studies.

Author

Year of publication

Study groups

Mean age

(years)

PTB

LBW

PTLBW

Outcome

Lopez et al.14

2002

Treatment group: 200

Control group: 200

Treatment group:

28±4.5

Control group:

27±4.3

Treatment group: 2

Control group: 12

Treatment group: 1

Control group: 7

Treatment group: 3

Control group: 19

Periodontal treatment showed significant reduction in PTLBW.

Michalowicz et al.15

2006

Treatment group: 413

Control group: 410

Treatment group: 26.1±5.6

Control group: 25.9±5.5

Treatment group: 49

Control group: 52

Treatment group: 40

Control group: 43

 

_______

 

Periodontal therapy failed to significantly alter rate of PTB and LBW.

Radnai et al.16

2007

Treatment group: 43

Control group: 46

Treatment group: 29.1±6.4

Control group: 28.9±5.4

Treatment group: 10

Control group: 22

Treatment group: 6

Control group: 18

Treatment group: 4

Control group: 14

Periodontal treatment lowered chance of PTB and LBW.

Tarannum et al.17

2007

Treatment group: 100

Control group: 100

Treatment group: 23±3.3

Control group: 22.9±3.6

Treatment group: 45

Control group: 68

Treatment group: 19

Control group: 48

 

 

______

Risk of PTB and LBW reduced significantly with periodontal treatment.

Newnham et al.18

2009

Treatment group: 546

Control group: 541

Treatment group: 30.5±5.5

Control group: 30.5±5.5

 

Treatment group: 52

Control group: 50

 

 

______

 

 

_______

No beneficial effect of periodontal therapy was reported.

 

Offenbacher et al.19

2009

Treatment group: 903

Control group: 903

Treatment group: 25.4±5.5

Control group: 25.3±5.5

Treatment group: 97

Control group: 81

Treatment group: 72

Control group: 71

 

 

_______

Periodontal therapy did not reduce PTB and LBW incidence.

Macones et al.20

2009

Treatment group: 376

Control group: 380

Treatment group: 24.1±5.2

Control group: 24.4±5.7

Treatment group: 58

Control group: 47

Treatment group: 48

Control group: 35

 

 

_______

Periodontal treatment failed to reduce PTB and LBW.

 

Oliveira et al.21

2010

Treatment group: 122

Control group: 124

Treatment group: 29.96±4.38

Control group: 26.58±3.96

Treatment group: 24

Control group: 26

Treatment group: 23

Control group: 31

Treatment group: 29

Control group: 31

Periodontal therapy did not significantly reduce PTB and LBW.

Weidlich et al.22

2012

Treatment group: 156

Control group: 147

 

 

________

Treatment group: 17

Control group: 14

Treatment group: 8

Control group: 6

Treatment group: 6

Control group: 4

Periodontal treatment did not affect the PTB and

LBW.

Queija et al.23

2019

Treatment group: 20

Control group: 20

Treatment group: 32±4.27

Control group: 32.25±4.21

Treatment group: 1

Control group: 3

Treatment group: 1

Control group: 3

 

 

_______

Periodontal treatment did not significantly reduced PTB and LBW.

PTB: preterm birth; LBW: low birth weight; PTLBW: preterm low birth weight

 

Risk of bias:

Cochrane risk of bias tool was utilized for evaluation of studies.13 All studies showed moderate overall risk of bias. (Figure 2) All studies reported low risk of bias for random sequence generation except one.21 In allocation concealment two studies reported low risk22,23 while rest reported moderate risk. All studies reported moderate risk for performance bias except one with low risk.18 For detection bias four studies15,18,19,20 reported low risk while for rest moderate risk was reported.  For attrition bias, reporting and other bias, all researches showed low risk. (Figure 3)

 

Figure 2. Risk of bias graph

 

Figure 3. Risk of bias summary.

 

Outcome variables:

Preterm birth:

 

Random effect model was selected as heterogeneity was high (I2=66%). Results show statistically non-significant difference in risk of PTB between patients of treatment group compared to control group (RR = 0.88; CI:0.69 to1.13;p =0.32) [Figure 4].

 

Figure 4. Forest plot of risk ratio for preterm birth in treatment group vs control group. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel.

 

Low birth weight:

As heterogeneity was high random effect model was used (I2=70%). No statistically significant difference was reported in meta-analysis in risk of LBW in treatment group compared to control group (RR =0.81;CI:0.56 to1.17; p =0.002) [Figure 5].

 

Figure 5. Forest plot of risk ratio for low birth weight in treatment group vs control group. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel.

 

Preterm low birth weight:

The heterogeneity was high (I2=74%) due to which random effect model was selected. For risk of PTLBW meta-analysis demonstrated statistically non-significant difference between treatment group compared to control group (RR =0.55; CI:0.22 to1.36; p =0.010) [Figure 6].

 

Figure 6. Forest plot of risk ratio for preterm low birth weight in treatment group vs control group. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel.

 

DISCUSSION

Present systematic review with meta-analysis evaluated consequence of periodontal therapy on unfavorable birth outcomes in terms of PTB, LBW and PTLBW. Results of meta-analysis demonstrated statistically non-significant difference in risk of PTB(RR = 0.88; CI:0.69 to1.13; p =0.32), LBW(RR = 0.81;CI :0.56 to1.17; p = 0.002) and PTLBW (RR = 0.55;CI :0.22 to1.36; p =0.010) between treatment group and control group.

 

Results of the present review corroborates with findings of some previous studies. Polyzos NP et al.,24 demonstrated non-significant difference between treatment group compared to control group for PTB[odds ratio(OR)= 0.79, 95%CI :0.58 to1.06;P =0.12] and LBW (OR=0.85, 0.70 to1.04;P=0.11).Thus, concluded that periodontal therapy cannot be considered as an effective method of reducing PTB and LBW incidence. Uppal A et al.,25 reported that periodontal therapy in pregnant patients don’t cause reduction in PTB (OR=0.589, 95% CI: 396-0.875) and LBW (OR=0.717; 95% CI: 0.440-1.169). Rosa MI et al.,26 demonstrated that periodontal disease treatment in pregnant patient showed no decrease the risk of PTB(RR = 0.90; 95%CI :0.68-1.19) & LBW(RR=0.92;95%CI:0.71-1.20). Fogacci MF et al.,27 stated that periodontal treatment doesn’t reduce incidence of PTB and LBW. Above findings can be a consequence of various reasons. Goldenberg et al.,28 proposed that by the time periodontal therapy is undertaken it is already late to for any positive impact on the pregnancy outcomes. Another possible mechanism is lack of severity of periodontal disease, thus not exerting a negative impact on pregnancy. 29 Lack of any significant difference in cord serum cytokines level between treatment and control group might be another explanation.29

 

Some reviews however reported positive impact of periodontal therapy on birth outcomes. George A et al.,30 reported reduction of PTB(OR = 0.65; 95%CI :0.45–0.93; P = 0.02) and LBW(OR = 0.53; 95%C I:0.31–0.92; P = 0.02) incidence. Bi WG et al.,31 demonstrated that periodontal therapy decreases risk of PTB(RR = 0.78; 95%CI :0.62-0.98; p =0.03) and LBW. Kim AJ etal.,32 reported significant decrease in risk of PTB with periodontal treatment.

 

Strength of present systematic review & meta-analysis includes comprehensive search for researches, assessment with Cochrane risk of bias tool and including only randomized clinical trials. Limitations of this review involves high heterogeneity among included studies and limiting to studies published in English language only.

 

CONCLUSION

Findings of present systematic review & meta-analysis demonstrated that periodontal therapy in pregnant women did not reduce unfavorable birth outcomes – PTB, LBW and PTLBW. More large scale studies are required to further explore impact of periodontal therapy on birth outcomes.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Arias T, Tomich P. Etiology and outcome of low birth weight and preterm infants. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:277-281.
  2. Goldenberg RL, Rouse DJ. Medical progress: Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med 1998;339: 313-320.
  3. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005;365:891-900.
  4. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008;371:261-269.
  5. Abramowicz M, Kass EH. Pathogenesis and prognosis of prematurity. N Engl J Med 1966;275:878-885, 938- 943, 1001-1007, 1053-1059.
  6. Main DM. The epidemiology of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1988;31:521-530.
  7. Nordstrom ML, Cnattingius S. Effects on birth weight of maternal education, socioeconomic status and workrelated characteristics. Scand J Soc Med 1996;24: 55-61.
  8. Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 1737-1742.
  9. Uwambaye, P., Munyanshongore, C., Rulisa, S. et al.Assessing the association between periodontitis and premature birth: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 204 (2021).
  10. Padilla-Cáceres, T., Arbildo-Vega, H. I., Caballero-Apaza, L., Cruzado-Oliva, F., Mamani-Cori, V., Cervantes-Alagón, S., Munayco-Pantoja, E., Panda, S., Vásquez-Rodrigo, H., Castro-Mejía, P., & Huaita-Acha, D. (2023). Association between the Risk of Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight with Periodontal Disease in Pregnant Women: An Umbrella Review. Dentistry Journal11(3), 74.
  11. Bobetsis YA, Graziani F, Gürsoy M, Madianos PN. Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Periodontol 2020 Jun;83(1):154-174.
  12. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic review. BMJ 2021; 372:n71.
  13. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928.
  14. López NJ, Smith PC, Gutierrez J. Periodontal therapy may reduce the risk of preterm low birth weight in women with periodontal disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2002 Aug;73(8):911-24.
  15. Michalowicz BS, Hodges JS, DiAngelis AJ, Lupo VR, Novak MJ, Ferguson JE, Buchanan W, Bofill J, Papapanou PN, Mitchell DA, Matseoane S, Tschida PA; OPT Study. Treatment of periodontal disease and the risk of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1885-94.
  16. Radnai M, Pál A, Novák T, Urbán E, Eller J, Gorzó I. Benefits of periodontal therapy when preterm birth threatens. J Dent Res. 2009 Mar;88(3):280-4. 
  17. Tarannum F, Faizuddin M. Effect of periodontal therapy on pregnancy outcome in women affected by periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007 Nov;78(11):2095-103.
  18. Newnham JP, Newnham IA, Ball CM, Wright M, Pennell CE, Swain J, Doherty DA. Treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1239-1248.
  19. Offenbacher S, Beck JD, Jared HL, Mauriello SM, Mendoza LC, Couper DJ, Stewart DD, Murtha AP, Cochran DL, Dudley DJ, Reddy MS, Geurs NC, Hauth JC; Maternal Oral Therapy to Reduce Obstetric Risk (MOTOR) Investigators. Effects of periodontal therapy on rate of preterm delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):551-559. 
  20. Macones GA, Parry S, Nelson DB, Strauss JF, Ludmir J, Cohen AW, Stamilio DM, Appleby D, Clothier B, Sammel MD, Jeffcoat M. Treatment of localized periodontal disease in pregnancy does not reduce the occurrence of preterm birth: results from the Periodontal Infections and Prematurity Study (PIPS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):147.e1-8. 
  21. Oliveira AM, de Oliveira PA, Cota LO, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Costa FO. Periodontal therapy and risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):609-15.
  22. Weidlich P, Moreira CH, Fiorini T, Musskopf ML, da Rocha JM, Oppermann ML, Aass AM, Gjermo P, Susin C, Rösing CK, Oppermann RV. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy and strict plaque control on preterm/low birth weight: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):37-44. 
  23. Caneiro-Queija L, López-Carral J, Martin-Lancharro P, Limeres-Posse J, Diz-Dios P, Blanco-Carrion J. Non-Surgical Treatment of Periodontal Disease in a Pregnant Caucasian Women Population: Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 27;16(19):3638. 
  24. Polyzos NP, Polyzos IP, Zavos A, Valachis A, Mauri D, Papanikolaou EG, Tzioras S, Weber D, Messinis IE. Obstetric outcomes after treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. 2010 Dec 29;341:c7017.
  25. Uppal A, Uppal S, Pinto A, Dutta M, Shrivatsa S, Dandolu V, Mupparapu M. The effectiveness of periodontal disease treatment during pregnancy in reducing the risk of experiencing preterm birth and low birth weight: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Dec;141(12):1423-34. 
  26. Rosa MI, Pires PD, Medeiros LR, Edelweiss MI, Martínez-Mesa J. Periodontal disease treatment and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cad Saude Publica. 2012 Oct;28(10):1823-33.
  27. Fogacci MF, Vettore MV, Thomé Leão AT. The effect of periodontal therapy on preterm low birth weight: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;117(1):153-165. 
  28. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF. Preterm birth and periodontal disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1925-7.
  29. Pirie M, Linden G, Irwin C. Interpregnancy non-surgical periodontal treatment and pregnancy outcome: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2013 Oct;84(10):1391-400.
  30. George A, Shamim S, Johnson M, Ajwani S, Bhole S, Blinkhorn A, Ellis S, Andrews K. Periodontal treatment during pregnancy and birth outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Jun;9(2):122-47.
  31. Bi WG, Emami E, Luo ZC, Santamaria C, Wei SQ. Effect of periodontal treatment in pregnancy on perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Oct;34(19):3259-3268. 
  32. Kim AJ, Lo AJ, Pullin DA, Thornton-Johnson DS, Karimbux NY. Scaling and root planing treatment for periodontitis to reduce preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Periodontol. 2012 Dec;83(12):1508-19. 
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Correlation Of Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness And Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness With Visual Field Defects In Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1500-1507
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Study Of The Effects Of Two Different Volumes And Concentrations Of Levobupivacaine On Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Characteristics In Upper Limb Surgeries
2025, Volume-6, Issue-4 : 1500-1506
Research Article Open Access
High-Resolution Ct In Diagnosing Interstitial Lung Disease In Post-Covid Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
2025, Volume-6, Issue-5 : 1529-1536
Research Article Open Access
A Prospective Study Comparing Landmark Technique Versus Preprocedure Ultrasound-Guided Paramedian Spinal Anaesthesia in the Elderly
2025, Volume-6, Issue-4 : 1512-1516
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-6, Issue-5
Citations
6 Views
14 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright IJMPR | All Rights Reserved