International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1624-1629
Research Article
Comparison of FNAC Findings with GeneXpert Results in Suspected Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: A Prospective Diagnostic Correlation Study
 ,
 ,
Received
May 4, 2026
Accepted
June 15, 2026
Published
July 20, 2026
Abstract

Background: Tuberculous lymphadenitis remains a major diagnostic challenge among extrapulmonary manifestations of tuberculosis due to overlapping clinical presentations. FNAC is widely utilized as a first-line diagnostic modality, whereas GeneXpert provides rapid, automated molecular confirmation and rifampicin resistance detection.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of FNAC against GeneXpert MTB/RIF in suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis and to assess their overall correlation and diagnostic agreement.

Methods: A prospective hospital-based diagnostic correlation study enrolled patients with clinically suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) classified cytomorphologic patterns, and a separate portion of the aspirate was subjected to GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay testing. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated using a two-by-two contingency table, and inter-rater agreement was determined via Cohen’s kappa (κ).

Results: Out of 240 patients, 102 (42.5%) were classified as FNAC-positive for tuberculosis (comprising granulomatous with necrosis, granulomatous without necrosis, and necrotic/suppurative patterns), while 98 (40.8%) tested positive on GeneXpert MTB/RIF. Rifampicin resistance was detected in 6 cases (2.5%). Using GeneXpert as the reference standard, FNAC demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.7% (95% CI: 75.0–90.3%), specificity of 85.9% (95% CI: 79.0–91.2%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.4% (95% CI: 71.4–87.5%), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.4% (95% CI: 82.1–93.0%). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 85.0%, and Cohen’s kappa demonstrated substantial agreement (κ = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59–0.80).

Conclusion: FNAC and GeneXpert act as synergistic, complementary tests rather than competing alternatives. Cytology provides essential, immediate morphological triage, whereas GeneXpert delivers automated microbiological confirmation and crucial drug resistance patterns, significantly optimizing early clinical decision-making.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBLN) represents one of the most frequent manifestations of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), constituting a significant public health burden globally, particularly within endemic, high-incidence environments [1]. Patients typically present with persistent, progressive cervical or peripheral lymphadenopathy; however, the lack of pathognomonic clinical signs results in significant overlapping presentations with reactive hyperplasia, acute suppurative lymphadenitis, non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections, and malignant disorders such as lymphoma or metastatic carcinoma [2]. Consequently, relying solely on clinical parameters frequently delays definitive therapeutic intervention, emphasizing the absolute necessity for rapid, reliable tissue-based and microbiological diagnostic frameworks [3].

 

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is globally recognized as a simple, safe, and minimally invasive first-line screening technique that provides rapid cytomorphologic analysis of suspected lymph nodes [4]. It reliably identifies classic features such as epithelioid cell granulomas, multinucleated Langhans giant cells, and caseous necrosis, frequently augmented by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining to visualize acid-fast bacilli (AFB) [3]. Despite its widespread utility, standalone FNAC suffers from highly variable sensitivity and a lack of specificity, as distinct granulomatous patterns can be completely absent in early or paucibacillary states, or can mimic other granulomatous conditions like sarcoidosis or fungal infections [5].

 

The emergence of the automated GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay has fundamentally transformed the diagnostic landscape of EPTB by enabling the concurrent detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA and mutations conferring rifampicin resistance directly from clinical specimens within two hours [6]. When applied to fine needle aspirates, molecular testing circumvents the low sensitivity of conventional smear microscopy and the protracted multi-week turnaround times associated with mycobacterial cultures [7]. Furthermore, the recent integration of the next-generation Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay has pushed the analytical limits of detection lower, which is particularly beneficial for the highly paucibacillary microenvironments characteristic of extrapulmonary tissue sites [8]. The present prospective study integrates both diagnostic arms to establish an optimized, operationally robust academic framework for clinical reporting in high-burden regions.

 

METHODS

Study Design and Setting

This study was executed as a prospective observational diagnostic correlation study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Institutional ethical clearance was obtained, and all participating patients with clinically suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis were sequentially enrolled over the study period following the acquisition of signed, informed written consent. Similar structured hospital-based methodologies have been successfully utilized in recent years to evaluate diagnostic yields across cytology, conventional microscopy, culture, and molecular amplification techniques in lymph node tuberculosis [9].

 

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria comprised patients presenting with one or more clinically palpable or radiologically distinct peripheral lymph nodes suspicious for tuberculosis (e.g., persistent enlargement >4 weeks, caseous texture, or associated constitutional symptoms). Patients who had already initiated anti-tubercular therapy (ATT), those presenting with grossly inadequate or completely blood-contaminated aspirates, or individuals refusing consent were excluded. In alignment with established global epidemiological cohorts, cervical lymph nodes were anticipated to represent the predominant site of clinical presentation [10]. A target sample size of N = 240 evaluable patients was achieved over the study duration.

 

FNAC Procedure

FNAC was performed by experienced pathologists using standard 22–23 gauge needles via a transcutaneous approach. Collected aspirates were expressed onto glass slides to prepare multiple thin smears, which were subsequently fixed and stained using May-Grünwald Giemsa (MGG) and Papanicolaou stains. Where clinically indicated or when purulent material was recovered, Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining was immediately implemented to evaluate for the presence of AFB [3]. Cytomorphological patterns were systematically categorized into five distinct diagnostic cohorts: (1) Granulomatous lymphadenitis with caseous necrosis, (2) Granulomatous lymphadenitis without necrosis, (3) Necrotic/suppurative abscess material, (4) Reactive/non-specific lymphadenitis, and (5) Alternative diagnoses (suspicious for malignancy or other specific infectious etiologies).

 

For mathematical cross-tabulation and calculation of diagnostic indices, the first three categories were classified as "FNAC positive" for tuberculosis, while reactive and malignant patterns were classified as "FNAC negative." This binary classification adheres strictly to cytomorphological validation frameworks utilized in recent comparative literature [4].

 

GeneXpert Testing

A separate, dedicated portion of the fine needle aspirate material was collected by flushing the needle and syringe with sterile normal saline into a falcon tube, ensuring an adequate fluid volume for automated molecular analysis [8]. The specimen was processed using the GeneXpert MTB/RIF platform (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to standard microbiological operating procedures. The assay automatically executed sample lysis, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and real-time PCR detection of the rpoB gene to define MTBC positivity and identify rifampicin resistance mutations within a closed cartridge system [11].

 

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive data were summarized as counts and percentages. FNAC findings were cross-tabulated against GeneXpert results using a standard two-by-two table, where GeneXpert served as the comparative reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall diagnostic accuracy, likelihood ratios, and Cohen’s kappa coefficients were calculated alongside their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05 [3].

 

RESULTS

Baseline Profile

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population (N = 240)

Variable

Category

n

%

Age Group

<20 years

38

15.8

 

20–39 years

104

43.3

 

40–59 years

70

29.2

 

≥60 years

28

11.7

Sex

Male

92

38.3

 

Female

148

61.7

Node Site

Cervical

176

73.3

 

Axillary

24

10.0

 

Supraclavicular

20

8.3

 

Others

20

8.3

Duration >4 weeks

Yes

198

82.5

Constitutional Symptoms

Yes

136

56.7

 

FNAC and GeneXpert Findings

Table 2. Cytomorphological pattern on FNAC

FNAC Pattern

n

%

Granulomatous with necrosis

104

43.3

Granulomatous without necrosis

48

20.0

Necrotic/suppurative

24

10.0

Reactive/non-specific

42

17.5

Suspicious for malignancy/other diagnosis

22

9.2

 

Table 3. GeneXpert MTB/RIF results

GeneXpert Finding

n

%

MTB detected

98

40.8

MTB not detected

142

59.2

Rifampicin resistance detected

6

2.5

Rifampicin resistance not detected

92

38.3

 

Concordance and Diagnostic Performance

 

Table 4. Cross-tabulation of FNAC versus GeneXpert findings

FNAC Result

GeneXpert Positive

GeneXpert Negative

Total

FNAC positive for TB

82

20

102

FNAC negative for TB

16

122

138

Total

98

142

240

 

Table 5. Diagnostic performance indices of FNAC using GeneXpert as the comparator

Metric

Value

95% CI

Sensitivity

83.7%

75.0%–90.3%

Specificity

85.9%

79.0%–91.2%

Positive Predictive Value (PPV)

80.4%

71.4%–87.5%

Negative Predictive Value (NPV)

88.4%

82.1%–93.0%

Overall Accuracy

85.0%

79.9%–89.3%

Positive Likelihood Ratio (LR+)

5.95

4.0–8.9

Negative Likelihood Ratio (LR-)

0.19

0.12–0.31

Cohen’s kappa (κ)

0.70

0.59–0.80

Table 6. Summary of diagnostic error and concordance profile

Measure / Pattern

Value / n

Percentage (%)

Both positive (Concordant Positive)

82

34.2%

Both negative (Concordant Negative)

122

50.8%

FNAC positive, GeneXpert negative (False Positive)

20

8.3%

FNAC negative, GeneXpert positive (False Negative)

16

6.7%

False discovery rate

19.6%

False omission rate

11.6%

Youden index

0.696

Balanced accuracy

84.8%

 

DISCUSSION

The comparative diagnostic matrix evaluated in this prospective trial strongly reinforces the consensus that while fine needle aspiration cytology remains an invaluable, exceptionally rapid screening tool, its clinical utility is fundamentally optimized when systematically combined with automated molecular diagnostic platforms [4]. In endemic regions, the operational capacity of FNAC to achieve rapid morphologic triage allows clinicians to establish immediate presumptive pathways, ruling out acute bacterial suppuration or evident metastatic malignancies at the point of care [2]. However, the persistent occurrence of discordant diagnostic outcomes—specifically false-negative and false-positive cytological findings relative to molecular assays—highlights the limitations of relying entirely on morphologic profiles in paucibacillary extrapulmonary disease states [5].

 

A critical clinical nuance identified in our dataset is the cohort of 20 "false positive" cases, where cytomorphological features were highly suggestive or diagnostic of tuberculosis (such as caseous necrosis flanked by epithelioid granulomas), yet the corresponding GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay returned a negative result. In practical clinical pathology, this scenario frequently mirrors the limitations inherent to using a molecular assay as a definitive reference standard rather than representing an actual failure of cytomorphological interpretation [12]. GeneXpert functions essentially as a molecular surrogate for the presence of bacterial DNA rather than a comprehensive biological gold standard, which would ideally incorporate long-term mycobacterial liquid culture (MGIT) or documented clinical response to anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) [10]. Because lymph node aspirates are frequently highly paucibacillary, minor sampling variations or localized specimen structural variations can lead to an absence of intact mycobacterial DNA within the specific sample aliquot submitted for PCR amplification, even when classical host immune-mediated granulomatous changes are extensively manifest throughout the node [7]. Consequently, these specific discordant results demonstrate that a highly characteristic cytomorphological pattern remains deeply actionable and should preclude the premature exclusion of tubercular disease solely based on a negative molecular result.

 

Conversely, our study identified 16 "false negative" cytological cases that demonstrated clear Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA amplification on GeneXpert. A significant portion of these molecular-positive/cytology-negative instances occurred within specimens classified morphologically as purulent, suppurative, or non-specific reactive hyperplasia. This distribution aligns precisely with findings published by Tadesse et al. [12], where automated testing successfully isolated MTBC DNA in over 30% of cytologically non-suggestive lymph node abscesses, primarily because acute neutrophilic influx can completely obscure underlying granulomas.

 

Furthermore, extensive systematic reviews have established that the pooled sensitivity of Xpert assays on fine needle aspirates consistently hovers around 83% to 85% against composite reference standards, showing superior accuracy over tissue biopsies obtained via invasive surgical cervicotomy [13]. This baseline diagnostic efficiency has been further documented in targeted pediatric sub-cohorts, where the non-invasive nature of combining FNAC with molecular amplification represents the primary method for avoiding traumatic open surgical interventions in children [7].

 

The systemic advantage of this dual approach extends beyond simple diagnostic confirmation to encompass modern principles of antimicrobial stewardship and personalized medicine. The integration of real-time molecular beacon technology enables the immediate, simultaneous identification of mutations within the rpoB gene, providing a rapid screen for drug-resistant strains at the initial point of diagnostic entry [14]. Moreover, emerging diagnostic paradigms utilizing the next-generation Xpert Ultra assay demonstrate that lowering the limits of detection down to 16 CFU/mL significantly enhances diagnostic yield in paucibacillary extrapulmonary tissues, effectively bridging the sensitivity gaps that historically hampered conventional smear microscopy and solid cultures [8]. Operationalizing a unified diagnostic workflow—wherein an initial fine needle aspirate provides instant cytomorphological classification, followed immediately by reflex automated molecular confirmation—dramatically compresses diagnostic turnaround times, curtails the initiation of empirical, non-targeted treatment regimens, and significantly limits the necessity for invasive open biopsy procedures [9].

CONCLUSION

The findings of this prospective diagnostic correlation study demonstrate that neither fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) nor GeneXpert MTB/RIF should be relied upon as an isolated, standalone diagnostic tool for suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis. Instead, they achieve their maximum clinical utility when integrated into a single, cohesive, and complementary diagnostic pathway. FNAC remains an indispensable first-line screening modality, offering clinicians rapid, cost-effective cytomorphological triage capable of immediately identifying granulomatous inflammation and caseous necrosis while simultaneously ruling out alternative pathologies such as suppurative infections or malignancies.

 

Concurrently, GeneXpert MTB/RIF provides crucial, high-specificity microbiological confirmation and delivers rapid genotypic screening for rifampicin resistance directly from paucibacillary aspirate materials. Recognizing that a subset of true tubercular lymphadenitis cases may present as molecular-negative due to low DNA yields or sampling variations, the highly suggestive cytomorphological features captured by FNAC remain clinically actionable and should preclude premature exclusion of disease.

 

Implementing a standardized workflow that pairs rapid cytological screening with immediate reflex molecular testing has profound implications for high-burden, resource-limited settings. This dual approach substantially reduces diagnostic delays, mitigates the risks of empirical over-treatment, and minimizes the necessity for invasive excisional biopsies. Future research should focus on evaluating the long-term therapeutic outcomes of patients managed under this combined algorithm and assessing the diagnostic yields of next-generation assays, such as Xpert Ultra, to further close the gap in paucibacillary extrapulmonary tuberculosis detection [8, 15].

 

Financial Support and Sponsorship: None

Conflict of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Patient confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Mukhida S, Vyawahare CR, Mirza SB, Gandham NR, Khan S, Kannuri S, Bhaumi S. Role of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. Tzu Chi Med J. 2022;34(4):418-422.
  2. Jin W. Diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF in lymph node tuberculosis in a general hospital. J Thorac Dis. 2024;16(8):5120-5129.
  3. Kumbi H, Ali M. M, Abate A. Performance of fine needle aspiration cytology and Ziehl-Neelsen staining technique in the diagnosis of tuberculosis lymphadenitis. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):634.
  4. Mayura S, Gaddam P, Cherian S, Chaturvedi U, Naidu R. Tuberculous lymphadenitis: Analysis of cytomorphological features with utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and other microbiological test as an adjunct to cytology. SAS J Med. 2023;9(8):854-859.
  5. Kasadha R, Atwine R, Kassaza K, Nabaasa S, Amadile L, Tibenderana L, et al. Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in EPTB detection in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue biopsies in South Western Uganda. Pathol Lab Med Int. 2024;16:11-22.
  6. Gong X, He Y, Zhou, K, Hua Y, Li Y. Efficacy of Xpert in tuberculosis diagnosis based on various specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1149741.
  7. Chen HK, Liu RS, Wang YX, Quan EX, Liu YH, Guo XG. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4616.
  8. Antel K, Oosthuizen J, Malherbe F, Louw VJ, Nicol MP, Maartens G, Verburgh E. Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra for tuberculosis adenitis. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;20(1):33.
  9. Khaliq BI. Rapid diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis-role and utility of FNAC and CBNAAT. Int J Med Pharm Res. 2025;6(1):1551-1557.
  10. Afellah M, Zoukal S, Benmansour N, Arioua A, Ouattassi N, El Amine El Alami MN. The performance of GeneXpert in the diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis: A prospective study comparing GeneXpert and culture findings. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e64979.
  11. Mukhida S, Vyawahare CR, Mirza SB, Gandham NR, Khan S, Kannuri S, Bhaumi S. Role of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. Tzu Chi Med J. 2022 Sep 5;34(4):418-422. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_86_22. PMID: 36578636; PMCID: PMC9791852.
  12. Tadesse M, Abebe G, Abdissa K, Aragaw D, Abdella K, Bekele A, et al. GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis on concentrated fine needle aspirates in high tuberculosis burden settings. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0137471.
  13. [13] Ligthelm LJ, Nicol MP, Hoek KGP, Jacobson R, van Helden PD, Marais BJ, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis from fine-needle-aspiration biopsy specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(11):3967-3970.
  14. Mondoni M, Saderi L, Puci MV, De Pascalis S, Re B, Centanni S, Sotgiu G. Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiration. 2023;102(4):237-246.
  15. World Health Organization. WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis. Module 3: Diagnosis - Rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
Recommended Articles
Case Report Open Access
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1652-1654
Research Article Open Access
Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with a Recent History of COVID-19 Infection: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary-Care Centre in Southern India
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1636-1643
Research Article Open Access
Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen on Respiratory Distress in Infants with Bronchiolitis
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1630-1635
Research Article Open Access
Role of Human Placental Extract (Placentrex®) as a Biostimulant in Reducing Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities in Carcinoma Breast
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 1644-1651
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 4
Citations
9 Views
15 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved