International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 4076-4079
Original Article
Comparative Study of Functional Outcome in Closed Extra-Articular Distal One-Third Both-Bone Leg Fractures Treated with Fibular Fixation Versus Without Fibular Fixation
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Feb. 12, 2026
Accepted
March 9, 2026
Abstract

Background: Management of distal one-third tibia-fibula fractures remains challenging due to the risk of malalignment, delayed union, and functional impairment. The role of fibular fixation as an adjunct to tibial intramedullary nailing remains controversial.

Objectives: To compare the radiological and functional outcomes of closed extra-articular distal one-third both-bone leg fractures treated with fibular fixation versus those treated without fibular fixation.

Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, over a period of one year. Twenty skeletally mature patients with closed extra-articular distal one-third tibia-fibula fractures were included. Patients were allocated alternately into two groups: Group A (fibular fixation, n=10) and Group B (without fibular fixation, n=10). Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score.

Results: The mean age was 42.6 ± 11.2 years in Group A and 41.3 ± 10.8 years in Group B. Road traffic accidents were the predominant mechanism of injury in both groups. Mean union time was shorter in the fibular fixation group (16.4 ± 2.1 weeks) compared to the non-fixation group (18.7 ± 2.8 weeks). Mean AOFAS scores at 6 months were significantly higher in the fixation group (88.4 ± 5.3) than in the non-fixation group (80.6 ± 6.9). Malalignment and delayed union were more common in the non-fixation group.

Conclusion: Fibular fixation in distal one-third tibia-fibula fractures resulted in superior alignment, earlier union, and improved functional outcomes. Fibular fixation should be considered as a useful adjunct in the management of these fractures.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Distal tibia and fibula fractures constitute a significant proportion of lower-limb injuries and present considerable therapeutic challenges. Distal one-third tibial fractures account for approximately 37% of all tibial shaft fractures and are associated with increased rates of malunion and delayed healing owing to the metaphyseal anatomy and limited soft tissue coverage.

 

Intramedullary nailing has become a preferred treatment modality because it minimizes soft tissue disruption, reduces infection risk, and facilitates early mobilization. However, the necessity of concomitant fibular fixation remains debated. Proponents argue that fibular fixation improves rotational and coronal plane stability, restores limb length, and decreases malalignment, while others suggest that it may not significantly influence fracture healing.

 

The present study was undertaken to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of distal one-third both-bone leg fractures treated with and without fibular fixation.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

Prospective comparative study.

Study Setting

Department of Orthopaedics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Study Duration

One year.

Study Population

Patients presenting to the Orthopaedic Outpatient Department and Emergency Department with distal one-third both-bone leg fractures.

Sample Size

Twenty patients were enrolled and allocated alternately into two groups:

  • Group A: Tibial fixation with fibular fixation (n=10)
  • Group B: Tibial fixation without fibular fixation (n=10)

 

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age between 18 and 80 years
  • Skeletally mature patients
  • Closed extra-articular distal one-third tibia-fibula fractures

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Open fractures
  • Intra-articular fractures
  • Segmental tibial fractures
  • Pathological fractures
  • Patients medically unfit for surgery
  • Patients unwilling to participate

 

Preoperative Evaluation

All patients underwent:

  • Primary and secondary trauma survey
  • Ultrasonography FAST examination where indicated
  • NCCT brain where required
  • Radiographs of the leg including knee and ankle joints
  • Computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction
  • Routine hematological and biochemical investigations

 

Outcome Measures

Primary outcomes included:

 

  • Time to radiological union
  • Functional outcome using AOFAS score Secondary outcomes included:
  • Malalignment
  • Delayed union
  • Non-union
  • Infection
  • Implant-related complications

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using appropriate comparative statistical methods. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

Demographic Characteristics

Parameter

Fibular Fixation (n=10)

Without Fibular Fixation (n=10)

Mean Age (years)

42.6 ± 11.2

41.3 ± 10.8

Male : Female

7 : 3

6 : 4

Road Traffic Accidents

80%

70%

 

Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups.

 

Fracture Union

Group

Mean Union Time (weeks)

With Fibular Fixation

16.4 ± 2.1

Without Fibular Fixation

18.7 ± 2.8

 

Patients who underwent fibular fixation demonstrated earlier radiological union compared with those treated without fibular fixation.

 

Functional Outcome

 

Follow-up

With Fibular Fixation

Without Fibular Fixation

1 Month

58.2 ± 6.1

52.4 ± 5.8

3 Months

74.6 ± 7.5

68.3 ± 8.2

6 Months

88.4 ± 5.3

80.6 ± 6.9

The fibular fixation group demonstrated superior functional outcomes at all follow-up intervals.

 

Malalignment

 

Type of Malalignment

With Fibular Fixation

Without Fibular Fixation

Varus/Valgus >5°

1

3

Rotational Deformity

0

2

Shortening >1 cm

0

2

Malalignment occurred more frequently in patients who did not undergo fibular fixation.

 

Complications

Complication

With Fibular Fixation

Without Fibular Fixation

Delayed Union

1

3

Non-union

0

1

Infection

1

1

Implant Prominence

1

Nil

 

The non-fixation group experienced a greater number of healing-related complications.

 

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrated superior radiological and functional outcomes among patients treated with fibular fixation. Earlier fracture union, improved AOFAS scores, and lower rates of malalignment were observed in the fixation group.

 

These findings are consistent with the work of Egol et al., who reported reduced late malalignment following fibular plating in distal tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. Morin et al. demonstrated biomechanically that fibular fixation enhances construct stiffness and resistance to rotational and coronal plane deformities.

 

Similarly, Varsalona and Liu highlighted the importance of fibular fixation in restoring limb length and maintaining reduction. Prasad et al. observed a significant reduction in malrotation and malalignment with fibular fixation. More recent studies by Sonkusale et al. and Rawal et al. have further supported the role of fibular fixation in improving alignment and fracture stability.

 

The findings of the current study reinforce the growing body of evidence suggesting that fibular fixation contributes positively to fracture stability and functional recovery without substantially increasing complication rates.

 

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Single-centre study
  • Short follow-up duration
  • Alternate allocation instead of randomized allocation

 

Further multicentric randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are recommended.

 

CONCLUSION

Fibular fixation in closed extra-articular distal one-third tibia-fibula fractures resulted in earlier fracture union, superior maintenance of alignment, and better functional outcomes compared with treatment without fibular fixation. The procedure appears to be a valuable adjunct to tibial fixation and should be considered in suitable cases to optimize patient outcomes.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Egol KA, Weisz R, Hiebert R, Tejwani NC, Koval KJ, Sanders Does fibular plating improve alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(2):94–103.
  2. Morin P, Reindl R, Harvey E, Beckman L, Steffen T. Fibular fixation as an adjuvant to tibial intramedullary nailing in the treatment of combined distal third tibia and fibula fractures: a biomechanical investigation. Can J 2008;51(1):45–50.
  3. Varsalona R, Liu Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: the role of fibular fixation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72(1):86–90.
  4. Prasad M, Yadav S, Sud A, Arora NC, Kumar N, Singh Assessment of the role of fibular fixation in distal-third tibia-fibula fractures and its significance in decreasing malrotation and malalignment. Injury. 2013;44(12):1885–1891.
  5. Li C, Li Z, Wang Q, Shi L, Gao F, Sun The role of fibular fixation in distal tibia-fibula fractures: a meta-analysis. Adv Orthop. 2021;2021:6668467.
  6. Sonkusale A, Jagtap S, Khedekar H, Keswani Necessity of fixation of fibula in distal tibia fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2023;9(2):384–389.
  7. Rawal N, et Functional outcome of distal third both bone leg fracture with and without fibula fixation. J Orthop Trauma Surg Relat Res. 2022;17(7).
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Comparison Of BISAP and Ranson's Scores in Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2777-2782
Research Article Open Access
Elevated CA19-9 in IgG4-Related Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2746-2752
Research Article Open Access
Role of B-Scan Ultrasonography in Detecting Posterior Segment Pathology in Eyes with Opaque Ocular Media: A Prospective Observational Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2708-2713
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Study of Propofol with Ketamine and Propofol with Butorphanol for Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Short Surgical Procedures
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 2720-2726
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 2
Citations
14 Views
6 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved