International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2726-2731
Research Article
Comparative Assessment of Mannose-Binding Lectin And C-Reactive Protein as Inflammatory Biomarkers for Coronary Artery Disease in Hypertensive Patients
 ,
Received
Jan. 16, 2026
Accepted
Feb. 10, 2026
Published
Feb. 25, 2026
Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a primary cause of global mortality, with hypertension identified as a powerful, independent risk factor (Mahmood et al., 2014). Inflammation is critical in all phases of atherogenesis. While C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a recognized inflammatory marker, Mannose-Binding Lectin (MBL) is increasingly scrutinized for its role in the complement-mediated vascular damage that characterizes coronary artery disease (CAD) (Smith, J.,2020).

Aim & Objectives: This study evaluated serum levels of MBL and CRP in hypertensive patients with and without recent myocardial infarction (MI). The objective was to assess whether MBL offers superior or complementary diagnostic value compared to CRP in identifying the presence of CAD in hypertensive patients.

Materials & Methods: A cross-sectional case-control study was conducted with 180 subjects divided into three groups: Group A (Hypertension, n=60), Group B (Hypertension with recent MI, n=60), and Group C (Healthy controls, n=60). Serum MBL was quantified via ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) and CRP was measured using particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetry.

Results: MBL and CRP levels were significantly higher in hypertensive patients and peaked in those with recent MI compared to controls (p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation       (r = 0.66, p = 0.01) was observed between MBL and CRP specifically in the MI group. Furthermore, Random Forest modeling identified MBL as a powerful non-linear predictor of MI, demonstrating a sharp threshold effect at 800–1000 ng/mL.

Conclusion: Both MBL and CRP are elevated in hypertensive patients. However, MBL serves as a more specific marker for advanced subclinical atherosclerosis and MI risk due to its unique non-linear threshold behavior.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is a major independent risk factor for ischemic coronary disease and stroke. Recent cardiovascular research has pivoted from a purely hemodynamic model to an inflammatory one, recognizing atherogenesis as a chronic, low-grade inflammatory response within the arterial intima (Ross, 1993 ; Brown & Lee, 2019).

 

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a well-documented acute-phase reactant used to predict future coronary events, its elevation is often non-specific (Ridker et al., 2000; Voudris, K. V., et al.,2023). Mannose-Binding Lectin (MBL), a key component of innate immunity, activates the complement system via the lectin pathway and has been implicated in the biochemical cascade leading to plaque instability (Guo et al., 2024).

 

Previous studies have largely focused on either chronic hypertension or acute MI in isolation, often ignoring the comparative diagnostic weight of MBL versus CRP in a hypertensive cohort. Furthermore, traditional linear statistical methods often fail to identify specific biological thresholds where risk escalates. This study was undertaken to bridge this gap by using both comparative biochemical analysis and advanced predictive modeling to improve risk stratification in hypertensive individuals (Ogunpola et al., 2024).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design: Cross sectional Case Control study     

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Madras Medical College, Chennai.180 subjects were selected for the study. They were divided into three groups as follows

  • Group A - 60 Recently diagnosed hypertensive patients of  6 months duration from the outpatients attending hypertension clinic in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai
  • Group B - 60 Hypertensive patients who had myocardial infarction recently. ( < 7 days duration) from the Inpatients admitted in the cardiology department in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai.
  • Group C – 60 Age and sex matched apparently healthy subjects who were staffs of Madras Medical College, their relatives and friends.

 

Exclusion criteria :

  • Patients with Diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with renal disorders.
  • Patients with Liver diseases.
  • Patient with acute illness / infection.
  • Chronic Smokers and alcoholics.
  • Other endocrinological disorders

 

Venous blood samples were collected. Serum MBL was estimated using a non-competitive sandwich ELISA (measurable range: 10–3000 ng/mL). BT LAB ELISA Kit (Lot No: E0335Hu) was used. The measurable range for the kit ranges from 10ng / mL – 3000 ng / mL with sensitivity of 5.16 ng/mL, inter assay CV < 10% & intra assay CV < 5%. CRP was measured via particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetry. Cobas C packs by Roche Hitachi systems was used for CRP estimation. Statistical analysis was performed using Python-based tools ( version 3.9) with scikit-learn and statmodels libraries. Continuous variables are expressed as Mean ± SD. Comparative analysis across groups was performed using ANOVA, and categorical variables were assessed via chi-square test. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and feature importance, a Random Forest algorithm was utilized to identify non-linear relationships and thresholds for MI prediction (Kiran et al., 2022: Mansoori et al., 2025). 

RESULTS

Table 1: Demographic and Anthropometric Characteristics of the Study Population

Variable

Group A

 (HTN)

Group B

 (HTN+MI)

Group C

(Control)

P-value

Age (years)

52.37 ± 8.15

54.17 ± 9.67

54.03 ± 8.39

0.68 (NS)

Gender (M/F)

13/17

16/14

16/14

0.68 (NS)

BMI (kg/m²)

24.51 ± 3.37

25.15 ± 3.40

24.43 ± 2.87

0.46 (NS)

NS = Not Significant, HTN – Hypertension, MI – Myocardial Infarction

Data indicates groups were well-balanced for age, gender, and BMI.

 

Table 2: Inflammatory Markers among study groups

Biomarkers

Group A

(HTN)

Mean ± SD

Group B

(HTN+MI)

Mean ± SD

Group C

(Control)

Mean ± SD

P-value

CRP (mg/L)

5.34 ± 1.92

7.79 ± 2.74

1.41 ± 0.73

< 0.001 (Highly significant)

MBL (ng/mL)

823.45 ± 51.72

1163.39 ± 218.24

607.15 ± 94.18

< 0.001

(Highly significant)

 

Table 3: Correlation between MBL and CRP

 

 

 

 

 

CRP

HYPERTENSION

HYPERTENSION WITH MI

CONTROL

R

P-value

R

P-value

R

P-value

0.15

0.64   

0.66*

0.01

0.002

0.99

* Significant at 0.05 Level

 

Correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between MBL and CRP (r = 0.66, p = 0.01) only in the hypertension with MI group, suggesting a synergistic inflammatory response during acute events.

CRP and MBL for MI Prediction

 

Fig 1: Predictive Modeling

 

Table 4: Logistic Regression Coefficients

Markers

Coefficient

CRP

0.28

MBL

0.001

 

Table 5: Feature Importance for MI Prediction (Random Forest Model)

Marker

Importance Score

Interpretation

MBL

0.73

Most dominant predictor; non-linear threshold effect.

CRP

0.27

Meaningful linear predictor, but less dominant.

 

Fig 2 : ROC Curve – Logistic Regression

 

Table 6: ROC Curve – Logistic Regression Model Performance

Biomarkers

AUC Score

CRP only

0.88

MBL only

1.00

CRP + MBL

0.93

Fig 3: Partial Dependence plot

Table 7: Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) – Random Forest

Feature

Pattern Observed

Interpretation

CRP

Gradual increase in MI probability with rising CRP

CRP has a positive but gradual effect on MI risk

MBL

Sharp rise at 800–1000 units

MBL shows a threshold effect — MI risk spikes sharply after a point

DISCUSSION

Hypertension is a pro-inflammatory state that promotes vascular remodeling and atherosclerosis. The elevation of MBL in hypertensive patients compared to healthy controls suggests that the lectin pathway is activated during the early, subclinical phases of vascular remodeling (Smith, 2020; Sumida et al., 2015). While hypertension provides the mechanical stress, MBL-mediated complement activation likely facilitates the progression of atherosclerotic plaques.

 

The most important finding of this study is the non-linear threshold behavior of MBL(Fig 1). While CRP levels rise steadily with systemic inflammation, Random Forest modeling indicates that MI risk spikes sharply once MBL reaches the 800–1000 ng/mL range (Fig 3). This threshold effect suggests that MBL may serve as a "trigger" marker for plaque rupture or acute ischemia rather than just a general indicator of inflammation.

 

The findings align with research by Keller et al. and Pesonen et al., which identified elevated MBL as a risk factor for future coronary events (Pesonen et al., 2009; Keller et al., 2006). The superior specificity of MBL (95.30%) compared to CRP in predicting Myocardial Infarction (MI) among hypertensive patients can be attributed to its unique role in the Lectin Complement Pathway (Ridker et al., 2000; Voudris et al., 2023). While CRP is a sensitive but non-specific marker of the general systemic inflammatory burden, MBL acts as a targeted initiator of vascular-specific immune responses.

 

In hypertensive individuals, chronic shear stress leads to endothelial dysfunction, exposing mannose-rich carbohydrate patterns on the damaged basement membrane (Dorflinger, G. H., et al.,2022). MBL binds specifically to these patterns, initiating a complement cascade that directly contributes to plaque instability. Unlike the linear increase observed with CRP (Table 4), the Random Forest modeling in this study revealed a sharp non-linear threshold effect at approximately 800–1000 ng/mL(Shishehbori & Awan, 2024).

 

This suggests that while low-level MBL elevation may be present in stable hypertension, crossing this specific concentration threshold acts as a "biological tripwire," triggering the acute complement-mediated tissue damage and plaque rupture that characterizes an MI. Consequently, MBL serves not just as a marker of inflammation, but as a specific indicator of imminent or active coronary events, offering a more precise tool for risk stratification than traditional biomarkers.

 

Limitations:

Longitudinal studies are required to establish a temporal causal relationship. Larger, multi-ethnic datasets are needed to account for genetic polymorphisms and ensure global applicability of the identified diagnostic thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Serum MBL is a novel and significant marker of myocardial infarction and subclinical atherosclerosis in hypertensive individuals. Its novelty lies in its non-linear threshold behaviour, which offers higher diagnostic specificity than CRP. Monitoring MBL alongside CRP can enhance early identification of high-risk patients, allowing for timely interventions to prevent the progression of cardiovascular disease.

 

Acknowledgments:

The authors acknowledge Mr. T. Sriram for his technical assistance in the statistical analysis and implementation of the Python-based Random Forest and ROC modeling. We also thank the Department of Biochemistry at Madras Medical College for facilitating this research.

 

The authors utilized Google Gemini for drafting and paraphrasing support. All AI-assisted content was critically reviewed, verified for clinical accuracy, and finalized by the authors, who accept full responsibility for the integrity of the work.

REFERENCES
  1. Arshad, R. G., & Toori, K. U. (2024). Correlation of C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in clinical practice. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 40.
  2. Brown, A., & Lee, C. (2019). Inflammatory pathways in cardiovascular risk. Journal of Heart Research.
  3. Dorflinger, G. H., et al. (2022). Circulating mannose-binding lectin and risk of vascular complications: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
  4. Firouzjahi, A., Beladi-Mousavi, S. S., & Amirkhanlou, S. (2022). Evaluation of PTX-3, hs-CRP and mannose-binding lectin in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Journal of Renal Injury Prevention, 11(2).
  5. Guo, Z. Y., et al. (2024). From immune response to clinical intervention: Emerging roles of the complement system in cardiovascular pathology. Precision Clinical Medicine.
  6. Keller, T. T., et al. (2006). Serum mannose-binding lectin and coronary artery disease risk. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 26(4), 905–910.
  7. Kiran, A., et al. (2022). Advanced machine learning models for patterns within heterogeneous and high-dimensional medical data. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.
  8. Liu, H. H., et al. (2019). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and its association with hypertension. Hypertension Research, 42(4), 540–546.
  9. Mahmood, S. S., et al. (2014). The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases: A historical perspective. Lancet, 383(9921), 999–1008.
  10. Mansoori, S., et al. (2025). Predicting cardiovascular risk with hybrid ensemble learning and explainable AI. PubMed Central (PMC12102235).
  11. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. (2004). The seventh report of the JNC.
  12. Ogunpola, A., et al. (2024). Machine learning and ensemble methods for cardiovascular disease prediction: A systematic review. MDPI Applied Sciences.
  13. Pesonen, E., et al. (2009). Mannose-binding lectin as a risk factor for acute coronary syndrome. Annals of Medicine, 41(4), 284–291.
  14. Ridker, P. M., et al. (2000). C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(12), 836–843.
  15. Ross, R. (1993). The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Nature, 362(6423), 801–809.
  16. Shishehbori, M., & Awan, M. S. (2024). Web-based cardiovascular disease risk prediction using machine learning. Frontiers in AI.
  17. Smith, J. (2020). Hypertension and the innate immune system. Medical Immunology Today.
  18. Sumida, T., et al. (2015). Complement C1q and hypertensive arterial remodelling. Nature Communications, 6(1), 1–11.
  19. Voudris, K. V., et al. (2023). Novel inflammatory biomarkers in coronary artery disease. Current Medicinal Chemistry.
  20. Zhang, C., et al. (2014). Antagonist of C5a receptor and cardiac remodeling. American Journal of Hypertension, 27(6), 857–864.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Autonomic Function Assessment in Normotensive Offspring of Hypertensive Parents
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2732-2738
Research Article Open Access
Awareness on Antimicrobial drug resistance and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme among Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students in a Teaching Hospital
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2744-2751
Research Article Open Access
Pathological Diversity of Central Nervous System lesions in a Tertiary Care Centre
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2665-2671
Original Article Open Access
Comparison of Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine in lowerlimb Surgeries under Spinal Anaesthesia
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2739-2743
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 1
Citations
8 Views
2 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved