Background: Cerebral hydatid cysts caused by Echinococcus multilocularis are rare, aggressive parasitic infections that present unique surgical challenges.
Objective: This study aims to report the clinical outcomes of surgical management in a case series of patients with E. multilocularis cerebral hydatid cysts.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 8 patients treated at our institution from 2021 to 2024. Surgical techniques included parieto-occipital craniotomy, cyst aspiration, piecemeal removal, and capsular resection.
Results: Complete cyst removal was achieved in 7 of 8 patients. A significant symptom improvement of 90% was noted, with a mean follow-up of 12.5 months. The recurrence rate was 12.5% (1 patient).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that individualized, aggressive microsurgical strategies yield high rates of cyst clearance and symptomatic improvement in this rare but devastating condition, highlighting the critical role of neurosurgical precision
Cerebral hydatid cysts, primarily associated with Echinococcus granulosus, can also arise from Echinococcus multilocularis, which is responsible for alveolar echinococcosis. While the incidence of cerebral involvement is low, E. multilocularis infections are characterized by their aggressive nature, rapid growth, and increased recurrence rates [1, 2].
The surgical management of these cysts is complicated by their location, size, and potential for rupture, making individualized surgical planning imperative [3]. While hepatic involvement in alveolar echinococcosis is well-documented, cerebral cases remain exceedingly rare and understudied, with no standardized neurosurgical protocols.
Unlike its hepatic counterpart, cerebral alveolar echinococcosis remains an enigma in neurosurgical practice, often masquerading as neoplasms or abscesses and challenging even the most experienced surgeons.
The rarity of cerebral involvement by Echinococcus multilocularis has translated into a paucity of standardized surgical protocols, leaving clinicians reliant on extrapolated strategies and anecdotal experience.
This case series seeks to address this gap by offering both surgical insight and outcome analysis.
By documenting one of the largest single-center experiences in cerebral alveolar echinococcosis, this case series not only addresses a critical gap in current neurosurgical literature but also sets the stage for formulating early diagnostic strategies and safer, standardized surgical protocols.
Echinococcus multilocularis is endemic in parts of Europe, North America, and Asia, with transmission occurring through contact with infected canids or ingestion of contaminated food and water [4]. Although cerebral involvement is rare, regions with higher prevalence of alveolar echinococcosis necessitate heightened awareness among clinicians.
The lifecycle of Echinococcus multilocularis involves definitive hosts, typically canids, and intermediate hosts such as rodents. In humans, the larval form can develop into multilocular cysts, which infiltrate brain tissue and lead to significant neurological complications [5].
Patients may present with various symptoms, including:
This study reports on 8 patients who underwent surgical management for E. multilocularis cerebral hydatid cysts at our institution over a four-year period, employing a modified surgical approach designed to optimize outcomes.
Clinical Implications :
Diagnosis of Cerebral Hydatid Cysts
FIGURES : SHOWING RADIOLOGICAL IMAGES OF THE CYST
This study emphasizes the importance of tailored surgical strategies and aggressive management in cases of E. multilocularis cerebral hydatid cysts, contributing valuable data to the existing literature on this rare condition.
This study presents a retrospective analysis of a uniquely challenging neurosurgical cohort: 8 patients diagnosed with cerebral alveolar echinococcosis caused by Echinococcus multilocularis, managed at our tertiary care neurosurgical center between January 2021 and December 2024.
These cases were neither routine nor predictable , they demanded surgical adaptability, unwavering anatomical precision, and strict anti-parasitic vigilance. Each patient represented an intersection of rare pathology and high-stakes operative risk. Every surgical step was performed with rupture in mind, not just as a complication, but as a catastrophe to be avoided at all costs.
These procedures tested the very limits of microsurgical patience and dexterity. Each surgery demanded a choreography of preoperative precision, intraoperative vigilance, and postoperative foresight , guided by the principle that in parasitic neurosurgery, prevention of rupture is as vital as cyst removal itself.
Our technique was not designed for speed but for control , for precision over pressure , given the known risk of anaphylaxis and dissemination.
Patients were enrolled based on:
We excluded:
All patients had prior exposure risk factors, and serological testing (ELISA for Echinococcus) was performed, though it was not the sole diagnostic criterion due to known false negatives in intracranial disease.
All patients received Albendazole chemotherapy (15 mg/kg/day) for one month prior to surgery. This preoperative anti-parasitic regimen aimed to reduce cyst viability, minimize intraoperative rupture risk, and improve postoperative outcomes.
Each patient underwent:
Preoperative preparation included:
The goal was not merely cyst removal — it was to extract a parasitic invader without rupture, without spill, and without recurrence.
This technique, though longer and more meticulous than traditional hydatid surgery, was adopted to meet the biological aggression of E. multilocularis with equivalent surgical precision.
FIGURE SHOWING : Microscopic excision of the cyst
Figure showing: piecemeal excision of cyst
Unlike classical hydatid surgeries that emphasize swift en bloc removal, our piecemeal yet controlled method was sculpted to handle multiloculated cysts that defy conventional containment. The use of intraoperative ultrasound added a real-time navigational layer, enabling dynamic adaptation during surgery.
Given the small sample size, statistical comparisons were primarily descriptive. The use of non-parametric tests like the Wilcoxon rank-sum provided robustness to the observed trends, though larger, controlled studies are required for validation.
FIGURE : SHOWING BULGING DURA WITH UNDERLYING HYDATID
FIGURE SHOWING : EXCISED CYSTIC WALL
RESULTS
Despite the aggressive nature of the parasite, complete cyst excision was achieved in 90% of cases — a testament to the disciplined execution of our modified protocol. The recurrence rate of 12.5 % was not only within the limits reported in the literature but occurred in the patient with the most infiltrative, multiloculated disease — underlining the need for surgical tailoring.
Table 1: Patient Demographics
|
Demographic |
Value |
|
Mean Age |
35.5 years (Range: 22-55) |
|
Sex |
6 males, 2 females |
|
Mean Symptom Duration |
6.2 months (Range: 2-18) |
Table 2: Clinical Presentation
|
Symptom |
Percentage (n/8) |
|
Headache |
90% (7/8) |
|
Seizures |
50% (4/8) |
|
Focal Neurological Deficits |
40% (3/8) |
|
Cerebral Edema |
80% (6/8) |
Table 3: Radiological Features
|
Feature |
Value |
|
Cyst Location |
Parieto-occipital: 80% (6/8) |
|
Mean Cyst Size |
4.5 cm (Range: 2-7 cm) |
|
Cyst Number |
Single cyst: 80% (6/8) |
Table 4: Surgical Outcomes
|
Outcome |
Value |
|
Complete Cyst Removal |
90% (7/8 patients) |
|
Residual Cyst |
10% (1/8 patients) |
|
Surgical Complications |
20% (2/8 patients) |
|
Recurrence Rate |
12.5% (1/8 patients) at mean follow-up of 12.5 months |
Microscopic analysis of intraoperative hydatid fluid for viable scolices was performed in all patients. Seven of eight patients showed no viable scolices, correlating with favorable outcomes and no recurrence. The one patient with recurrent disease demonstrated the presence of viable scolices on microscopic examination, suggesting either incomplete chemotherapeutic efficacy or a particularly aggressive parasitic strain
Table 5: Postoperative Outcomes
|
Outcome |
Value |
|
Symptom Improvement |
90% (7/9 patients) |
|
Mean Hospital Stay |
7.5 days (Range: 5-14 days) |
|
Mean Follow-Up |
12.5 months (Range: 6-24 months) |
|
Patient ID |
Cyst Location |
Cyst Size (cm) |
Cyst Number |
Surgical Outcome |
Recurrence |
|
1 |
Parieto-occipital |
4.2 |
Single |
Complete removal |
No |
|
2 |
Frontal lobe |
3.5 |
Single |
Complete removal |
No |
|
3 |
Parieto-occipital |
5.1 |
Single |
Complete removal |
No |
|
4 |
Parieto-occipital |
4.8 |
Multiple |
Residual cyst |
Yes |
|
5 |
Parieto-occipital |
3.2 |
Single |
Complete removal |
No |
|
6 |
Frontal lobe |
4.5 |
Single |
Complete removal |
No |
|
7 |
Parieto-occipital |
5.5 |
Multiple |
Complete removal |
No |
|
8 |
Parieto-occipital |
4.1 |
Single |
Complete removal |
No |
|
Patient |
Preoperative Albendazole Duration |
Viable Scolices (Microscopy) |
Recurrence |
Notes |
|
1 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
|
2 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
|
3 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
|
4 |
1 month |
Positive |
Yes |
Multiple cysts |
|
5 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
|
6 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
|
7 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
|
8 |
1 month |
Negative |
No |
— |
Table 8 : Comparison Table with Literature
|
Study |
Year |
No. of Patients |
Complete Removal (%) |
Recurrence (%) |
Comments |
|
Kantarci et al. |
2017 |
35 |
92% |
12% |
Traditional resection |
|
Liu et al. |
2020 |
22 |
95% |
9% |
Used neuronavigation |
|
Our Study |
2024 |
8 |
90% |
12.5% |
Modified piecemeal technique |
Statistical Analysis
DISCUSSION
The management of E. multilocularis cerebral hydatid cysts presents notable challenges due to their anatomical complexity and the potential for intraoperative complications [10]. Our findings indicate that a modified surgical approach can lead to high rates of complete cyst removal and low recurrence rates.
Key findings from our study include:
Previous studies support our findings; Kantarci et al. reported a 92% complete removal rate and a 12% recurrence rate in a larger cohort, while Liu et al. demonstrated enhanced outcomes with individualized surgical approaches [13, 14, 15].
Our experience reinforces that surgical management of E. multilocularis in the brain is not simply about removal — it is about containment, clearance, and long-term control. The absence of viable scolices in most cases highlights the utility of preoperative Albendazole chemotherapy in reducing cyst activity. However, recurrence in the one patient with viable scolices emphasizes the need for individualized duration and possibly intensified anti-parasitic regimens in selected cases.
This study is limited by its retrospective nature, relatively small sample size, and single-surgeon experience, which may introduce selection and technique bias. Additionally, long-term follow-up beyond two years was unavailable for all patients. Despite these limitations, the depth of intraoperative documentation and uniformity in surgical technique strengthen the credibility of the results.
In this series, success was not measured solely by cyst removal, but by preservation of neurological function and prevention of disease resurgence.
Future efforts must move beyond cystectomy to a holistic paradigm that includes early detection, surgical planning, anti-parasitic stewardship, and radiological vigilance.
Future research should explore the utility of endoscopic or minimally invasive approaches in select cases and the role of preoperative immunomodulation in reducing cyst wall friability. Collaborative, multicentric registries could provide deeper epidemiological insight and help validate optimal timing and duration of antiparasitic therapy.
CONCLUSION
Though grounded in a limited cohort, our surgical experience paves a replicable path forward, one that aligns meticulous dissection with parasite biology, ensuring that each intervention not only removes the disease but anticipates its resurgence.
Our approach, though built on just ten patients, offers a reproducible and safe pathway for tackling one of neurosurgery’s most formidable parasitic adversaries.
Declaration:
Conflicts of interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author contribution: All authors have contributed in the manuscript.
Author funding: Nill
REFERENCES