International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 4856-4863
Research Article
Burden Of Suboptimal Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in Eastern India: Evidence from A Tertiary Care Centre in West Bengal
 ,
 ,
Received
April 30, 2026
Accepted
May 22, 2026
Published
June 30, 2026
Abstract

Introduction: Poor adherence to antihypertensive medications remains a major barrier to achieving optimal blood pressure control, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Evidence regarding determinants of antihypertensive adherence from eastern India remains limited. This study assessed the burden of suboptimal adherence and explored factors associated with adherence among hypertensive patients attending a tertiary care centre in West Bengal, India.

Aims and objectives: To assess the burden of suboptimal adherence to antihypertensive therapy among adult hypertensive patients attending a tertiary care centre in West Bengal and to identify the socio-demographic, clinical, healthcare utilisation, and treatment-related factors associated with medication adherence.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 112 adult hypertensive patients in a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal. Data on socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were collected using a pretested questionnaire. Medication adherence was assessed using the 9-item Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test and one-way ANOVA, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: Among 112 hypertensive patients, 62.50% had suboptimal adherence and 37.50% had good adherence. The mean Hill-Bone adherence score was 24.64±6.43. Adherence was significantly associated with occupation (p=0.030), socio-economic status (p=0.031), duration of hypertension (p<0.001), and out-of-pocket expenditure (p=0.001), while BP control showed no significant association (p=0.759).

Conclusion: Adherence was mainly influenced by socio-economic and treatment-related factors. Longer disease duration and out-of-pocket expenditure reduced adherence. Reducing financial barriers and improving healthcare support may enhance adherence and blood pressure control.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Hypertension remains one of the leading modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and premature mortality worldwide. Despite the availability of effective antihypertensive medications, blood pressure control rates remain suboptimal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of hypertension is rapidly increasing.[1,2] According to recent estimates, more than one billion adults globally live with hypertension, with India contributing substantially to this burden.[3] In India, hypertension affects nearly one-third of the adult population and is responsible for a significant proportion of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[4,5] Although awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of hypertension have improved over the past decade, achieving sustained blood pressure control remains a major challenge.[6] One of the most important determinants of poor blood pressure control is inadequate adherence to prescribed antihypertensive therapy.[7] Medication adherence refers to the extent to which a patient's medication-taking behavior corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider.[8] Suboptimal adherence has been associated with uncontrolled hypertension, increased risk of cardiovascular events, frequent hospitalizations, reduced quality of life, and higher healthcare expenditures.[9,10] Factors influencing adherence are multifactorial and include patient-related, therapy-related, socioeconomic, and health-system-related determinants.[11] Evidence from different regions of India suggests considerable variability in adherence levels owing to cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare-access disparities.[12,13] However, data from eastern India, particularly West Bengal, remain limited. Understanding the burden of suboptimal adherence in this setting is essential for designing targeted interventions to improve treatment outcomes and reduce cardiovascular risk. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate the burden of suboptimal adherence to antihypertensive therapy among patients attending a tertiary care centre in West Bengal, India and factors associated with their adherence.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design: A hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study.

 

Study Place: Prafulla Chandra Sen Government Medical College and Hospital (PCSGMCH), Arambagh, West Bengal.

 

Study Population: The study population comprised adult hypertensive patients aged 18 years or older who had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of hypertension for at least two years and were receiving antihypertensive medication at the time of the survey.

 

Duration of the Study: 2 Years

 

Sample Size: 112 patients

 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years and above.
  • Diagnosed cases of hypertension for at least 2 years by a registered medical practitioner.
  • Currently receiving antihypertensive medication.
  • Attending the outpatient department of the study hospital during the study period.
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.

 

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe illness or medical emergencies requiring immediate treatment.
  • Patients with cognitive impairment, psychiatric illness, or communication difficulties that prevent reliable interview.
  • Pregnant women with gestational hypertension/preeclampsia.
  • Patients unwilling to participate or provide informed consent.
  • Incomplete or unreliable responses to the study questionnaire.

 

Study Variable:

  • Antihypertensive medication adherence status (HB-MAS score)
  • Blood pressure control status (Controlled/Uncontrolled)
  • Duration of hypertension
  • Socio-economic status
  • Out-of-pocket expenditure for treatment
  • Occupation
  • Comorbidities
  • Medication consumption per day (pill burden)
  • Clinical status of hypertension
  • Healthcare-seeking behaviour

 

Statistical Analysis: For statistical analysis data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and then analyzed by SPSS (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Graph Pad Prism version 5. Data had been summarized as mean and standard deviation for numerical variables and count and percentages for categorical variables. Z-test (Standard Normal Deviate) was used to test the significant difference of proportions. Once a t value is determined, a p-value can be found using a table of values from Student's t-distribution. If the calculated p-value is below the threshold chosen for statistical significance (usually the 0.10, the 0.05, or 0.01 level), then the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered for statistically significant.

RESULT

Table 1: Distribution of Socio-demographic and Clinical profile of the study participants (N=112)

 

Categories

Percentage

Age in years

18–40

19 (16.96%)

41–59

46 (41.07%)

≥60

47 (41.97%)

Gender

Male

60 (53.57%)

Female

52 (46.43%)

Marital Status

Currently Married

75 (66.96%)

Never Married

14 (12.50%)

Widow/Widower

23 (20.54%)

Education

Illiterate

43 (38.39%)

Educated up to Secondary

37 (33.05%)

Higher Secondary and Above

32 (28.56%)

Occupation

Labourer

23 (20.54%)

Service/Self-employed

23 (20.54%)

Homemaker

36 (32.14%)

Unemployed/Retired

30 (26.78%)

Socio-economic Status

Class I & II

28 (25.00%)

Class III

20 (17.86%)

Class IV

23 (20.53%)

Class V

41 (36.61%)

Duration of Hypertension

<10 years

81 (72.32%)

≥10 years

31 (27.68%)

Current Clinical Status

Asymptomatic & Controlled

43 (38.39%)

Asymptomatic & Uncontrolled

10 (8.93%)

Symptomatic & Controlled

46 (41.07%)

Symptomatic & Uncontrolled

13 (11.61%)

Care-seeking Behaviour

Public Only

67 (59.82%)

Public + Private

45 (40.18%)

Co-morbidities

None

39 (34.82%)

Present

73 (65.18%)

Smoking Status

Current/Ex-smoker

35 (31.25%)

Non-smoker

77 (68.75%)

Out-of-pocket Expenditure

Yes

47 (41.96%)

No

65 (58.04%)

Knowledge about Complications

Yes

47 (41.96%)

No

65 (58.04%)

Experienced Side Effects

Yes

21 (18.75%)

No

91 (81.25%)

Experienced Hypertension-related Complications

Yes

34 (30.36%)

No

78 (69.64%)

Medication Consumption per Day

1–2

46 (41.07%)

3–5

54 (48.21%)

≥6

12 (10.72%)

 

Table 2: Bivariate analysis showing the association between Socio-demographic and Clinical profile of the study participants and adherence score to antihypertensives (N=112) Top of Form

 

Categories

Adherence Score (Mean ± SD)

Test of Significance

Age in years

18–40

27.58 ± 5.04

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.090)

41–59

24.15 ± 5.66

≥60

23.94 ± 7.37

Gender

Male

23.97 ± 6.70

Independent t-test (p = 0.234)

Female

25.42 ± 6.09

Marital Status

Currently Married

24.15 ± 6.34

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.083)

Never Married

23.07 ± 6.12

Widow/Widower

27.22 ± 6.49

Education

Illiterate

25.05 ± 6.18

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.613)

Educated up to Secondary

24.14 ± 6.87

Higher Secondary and Above

25.89 ± 6.35

Occupation

Labourer

23.65 ± 6.72

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.030)

Service & Self-employed

23.43 ± 6.01

Homemaker

27.25 ± 6.00

Unemployed/Retired

23.20 ± 6.39

Socio-economic Status

Class I & II

26.19 ± 5.76

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.031)

Class III

27.29 ± 6.17

Class IV

23.43 ± 6.24

Class V

22.95 ± 6.62

Duration of Hypertension

<10 years

26.27 ± 5.30

Independent t-test (p < 0.001)

≥10 years

20.39 ± 7.25

Current Clinical Status

Asymptomatic & Controlled

24.09 ± 6.10

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.758)

Asymptomatic & Uncontrolled

24.90 ± 6.84

Symptomatic & Controlled

25.37 ± 6.53

Symptomatic & Uncontrolled

23.69 ± 7.33

Care-seeking Behaviour

Public Only

25.36 ± 5.73

Independent t-test (p = 0.152)

Public + Private

23.58 ± 7.30

Co-morbidities

None

25.28 ± 5.52

Independent t-test (p = 0.445)

Present

24.30 ± 6.88

Smoking Status

Current/Ex-smoker

25.31 ± 6.97

Independent t-test (p = 0.459)

Non-smoker

24.34 ± 6.20

Out-of-pocket Expenditure

Yes

22.40 ± 6.55

Independent t-test (p = 0.001)

No

26.26 ± 5.88

Knowledge about Complications

Yes

23.26 ± 7.02

Independent t-test (p = 0.052)

No

25.65 ± 5.83

Experienced Side Effects

Yes

22.24 ± 6.46

Independent t-test (p = 0.057)

No

25.20 ± 6.34

Experienced Hypertension-related Complications

Yes

23.82 ± 6.37

Independent t-test (p = 0.057)

No

25.00 ± 6.47

Medication Consumption per Day

1–2

25.35 ± 6.33

One-way ANOVA (p = 0.510)

3–5

23.91 ± 6.79

≥6

25.25 ± 5.15

 

Table 3: Distribution of Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scores Among Study Participants (N=112)

Adherence Category

Frequency

Percentage

Good Adherence (Score ≥ 80% of maximum)

42

37.50%

Moderate Adherence

38

33.93%

Poor Adherence

32

28.57%

Suboptimal Adherence (Moderate + Poor)

70

62.50%

 

Table 4: Domain-wise Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale Scores (N=112)

HB-MAS Domain

Mean ± SD

Possible Score Range

Medication-taking Behaviour

13.82 ± 3.44

9–36

Appointment Keeping

6.27 ± 1.83

2–8

Salt Intake Behaviour

4.52 ± 1.41

3–12

Overall HB-MAS Score

24.64 ± 6.43

14–56

 

 

Table 5: Association Between Adherence Category and Blood Pressure Control

Blood Pressure Status

Good Adherence n (%)

Suboptimal Adherence n (%)

p-value

Controlled BP

34 (80.95%)

55 (78.57%)

0.759

Uncontrolled BP

8 (19.05%)

15 (21.43%)

 

Figure 1: Distribution of Socio-demographic and Clinical profile of the study participants (N=112)

 

Figure 2: Comparison of Communication Skill Improvement by Gender

Distribution of Socio-demographic and Clinical Profile of the Study Participants

 

RESULTS

The study included 112 hypertensive patients. The majority belonged to the age groups of 41–59 years (41.07%) and ≥60 years (41.97%). Males constituted 53.57% of the participants. Most participants were currently married (66.96%), while 38.39% were illiterate. Homemakers represented the largest occupational group (32.14%), and 36.61% belonged to socio-economic class V. The majority had hypertension for less than 10 years (72.32%) and sought care exclusively from public health facilities (59.82%). Comorbidities were present in 65.18% of participants, while 41.96% reported out-of-pocket expenditure for treatment.

 

Interpretation

The study population primarily consisted of middle-aged and elderly hypertensive patients with a slight male predominance. Most participants had a relatively shorter duration of hypertension and relied on public healthcare services. A substantial proportion belonged to lower socio-economic classes and had associated comorbidities, indicating a potentially vulnerable patient population requiring sustained long-term care and support.

 

Bivariate Analysis Showing Association Between Participant Characteristics and Adherence Score

Results

Significant associations with adherence score were observed for occupation (p=0.030), socio-economic status (p=0.031), duration of hypertension (p<0.001), and out-of-pocket expenditure (p=0.001). Homemakers had the highest mean adherence score (27.25±6.00). Participants with hypertension duration of less than 10 years demonstrated significantly higher adherence scores (26.27±5.30) than those with hypertension for 10 years or more (20.39±7.25). Individuals without out-of-pocket expenditure also showed better adherence (26.26±5.88) compared to those incurring treatment expenses (22.40±6.55). No significant association was observed with age, gender, marital status, education, clinical status, care-seeking behaviour, comorbidities, smoking status, knowledge about complications, side effects, hypertension-related complications, or number of medications consumed per day (p>0.05).

 

Interpretation

The findings suggest that treatment-related and socio-economic factors play an important role in medication adherence. Longer disease duration and financial burden adversely affected adherence, whereas favourable socio-economic conditions and homemaker status were associated with better adherence. These results highlight the importance of addressing economic barriers and providing continued support for patients with longstanding hypertension.

 

Distribution of Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scores Among Study Participants

Results

Among the study participants, 42 (37.50%) demonstrated good adherence to antihypertensive therapy, while 38 (33.93%) showed moderate adherence and 32 (28.57%) exhibited poor adherence. Overall, 70 participants (62.50%) were classified as having suboptimal adherence.

 

Interpretation

The burden of suboptimal adherence was high, affecting nearly two-thirds of the hypertensive patients. This finding indicates that inadequate adherence to antihypertensive therapy remains a major challenge and may contribute to poor long-term disease control and increased risk of complications.

 

Domain-wise Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale Scores

Results

The mean overall Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale score was 24.64±6.43. Among the individual domains, medication-taking behaviour had the highest mean score (13.82±3.44), followed by appointment keeping (6.27±1.83) and salt intake behaviour (4.52±1.41).

 

Interpretation

Medication-taking behaviour contributed most substantially to the overall adherence score, indicating that difficulties in maintaining regular medication use were a major component of adherence-related challenges. The findings suggest that interventions targeting medication-taking practices may yield the greatest improvement in overall adherence.

 

Association Between Adherence Category and Blood Pressure Control

Results

Among participants with good adherence, 34 (80.95%) had controlled blood pressure, whereas 8 (19.05%) had uncontrolled blood pressure. Among those with suboptimal adherence, 55 (78.57%) had controlled blood pressure and 15 (21.43%) had uncontrolled blood pressure. The association between adherence category and blood pressure control was not statistically significant (p=0.759).

 

Interpretation

Although a higher proportion of participants with good adherence had controlled blood pressure, the difference was not statistically significant. This suggests that factors other than medication adherence, such as treatment regimen, disease severity, lifestyle factors, and comorbid conditions, may also influence blood pressure control in this population.

 

 

DISCUSSION

The present hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study evaluated the burden of suboptimal adherence to antihypertensive therapy among 112 adult hypertensive patients attending a tertiary care centre in West Bengal. The findings demonstrate that medication adherence remains a major challenge in hypertension management, with important associations observed between adherence behaviour, socio-economic factors, treatment burden, and duration of disease. In the present study, the majority of participants were middle-aged and elderly, with 41.07% belonging to the 41–59 years age group and 41.97% aged ≥60 years. Similar demographic patterns have been reported in hypertension studies where older adults constitute a major proportion due to increased risk of vascular changes and chronic disease burden with advancing age [14]. A slight male predominance (53.57%) was observed in the present study, which is comparable with findings from several Indian studies showing higher healthcare utilization among male hypertensive patients, although adherence patterns may vary depending on social support and healthcare accessibility [15]. The study showed that comorbidities were present among 65.18% of participants. Hypertension commonly coexists with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic conditions, increasing medication burden and complexity of treatment. Previous studies have demonstrated that multimorbidity and polypharmacy are important contributors to poor adherence due to increased regimen complexity and reduced patient motivation for long-term therapy [16]. A major finding of the present study was the high burden of suboptimal adherence, with 62.50% of participants classified as having moderate or poor adherence. This indicates that nearly two-thirds of hypertensive patients had difficulty maintaining optimal medication-taking behaviour. Similar observations have been reported in previous studies, where non-adherence rates among hypertensive patients ranged widely due to differences in population characteristics and assessment methods [17]. Poor adherence is a significant public health concern as it contributes to inadequate blood pressure control, increased cardiovascular events, and higher healthcare expenditure [18]. The mean overall Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale score in the present study was 24.64±6.43. Among the different domains, medication-taking behaviour showed the highest mean score (13.82±3.44), suggesting that regular medication intake and maintaining daily treatment schedules represent major challenges. The Hill-Bone scale has been widely used to assess adherence-related behaviours, and previous research has emphasized the importance of identifying specific behavioural barriers rather than focusing only on clinical outcomes. In the present analysis, occupation showed a significant association with adherence score (p=0.030). Homemakers demonstrated better adherence compared with other occupational groups. This may be due to greater availability of time, regular daily routines, and better opportunity to incorporate medication schedules into daily activities. Similar studies have reported that lifestyle patterns, work-related stress, and daily responsibilities influence medication-taking behaviour among patients with chronic diseases [19]. Socio-economic status was significantly associated with adherence (p=0.031). Participants from lower socio-economic backgrounds showed comparatively lower adherence scores, which may be related to financial limitations, difficulty accessing medicines, and competing household expenses. The present study also found a significant association between out-of-pocket expenditure and adherence (p=0.001), with patients without additional treatment-related expenses showing better adherence. Financial barriers have been consistently identified as important determinants of poor adherence, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Duration of hypertension showed a strong association with adherence (p<0.001). Patients with hypertension duration of less than 10 years had significantly higher adherence scores compared with those having hypertension for ≥10 years. Longer disease duration may lead to treatment fatigue, reduced perceived benefit of medication, and decreased motivation for lifelong therapy. Similar findings have been reported where chronic disease duration was associated with declining medication adherence over time. Although good adherence was associated with a higher proportion of controlled blood pressure (80.95%) compared with suboptimal adherence (78.57%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.759). This suggests that blood pressure control is influenced by multiple factors, including lifestyle modifications, dietary practices, physical activity, drug regimen, disease severity, and biological response to therapy. Previous studies have also highlighted that adherence alone may not completely explain variations in blood pressure control [20]. Overall, the findings emphasize that suboptimal adherence is a major challenge among hypertensive patients in Eastern India. Interventions focusing on patient education, reduction of financial barriers, simplified treatment regimens, regular follow-up, and behavioural counselling may improve adherence and contribute to better hypertension outcomes.

 

CONCLUSION

The present study concludes that suboptimal adherence to antihypertensive therapy is highly prevalent among patients attending a tertiary care centre in West Bengal, with nearly two-thirds of participants demonstrating moderate to poor adherence. Adherence was significantly influenced by occupation, socio-economic status, duration of hypertension, and out-of-pocket expenditure, highlighting the role of socio-economic and treatment-related barriers in long-term disease management. Although better adherence was associated with a higher proportion of controlled blood pressure, the relationship was not statistically significant, indicating the influence of multiple factors on hypertension control. Strengthening patient counselling, improving medication accessibility, reducing financial barriers, and implementing regular follow-up strategies are essential to improve adherence and reduce the burden of hypertension-related complications.

 

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. Global report on hypertension: the race against a silent killer. World Health Organization; 2023 Sep 19.
  2. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nature reviews nephrology. 2020 Apr;16(4):223-37.
  3. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, Gregg EW, Bennett JE, Solomon B, Singleton RK, Sophiea MK. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. The lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-80.
  4. Gupta R, Xavier D. Hypertension: The most important non communicable disease risk factor in India. Indian heart journal. 2018 Jul 1;70(4):565-72.
  5. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Sharma M, Roth GA, Johnson C, Harikrishnan S, Gupta R, Pandian JD, Naik N, Roy A, Dhaliwal RS. The changing patterns of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. The Lancet Global Health. 2018 Dec 1;6(12):e1339-51.
  6. Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Marcus ME, Ebert C, Zhumadilov Z, Wesseh CS, Tsabedze L, Supiyev A, Sturua L, Bahendeka SK, Sibai AM. The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual-level data from 1· 1 million adults. The Lancet. 2019 Aug 24;394(10199):652-62.
  7. Burnier M, Egan BM. Adherence in hypertension: a review of prevalence, risk factors, impact, and management. Circulation research. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):1124-40.
  8. Sabaté E, editor. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. World health organization; 2003.
  9. Chowdhury R, Khan H, Heydon E, Shroufi A, Fahimi S, Moore C, Stricker B, Mendis S, Hofman A, Mant J, Franco OH. Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences. European heart journal. 2013 Oct 7;34(38):2940-8.
  10. Corrao G, Parodi A, Nicotra F, Zambon A, Merlino L, Cesana G, Mancia G. Better compliance to antihypertensive medications reduces cardiovascular risk. Journal of hypertension. 2011 Mar 1;29(3):610-8.
  11. Krousel-Wood M, Thomas S, Muntner P, Morisky D. Medication adherence: a key factor in achieving blood pressure control and good clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. Current opinion in cardiology. 2004 Jul 1;19(4):357-62.
  12. Teshome DF, Bekele KB, Habitu YA, Gelagay AA. Medication adherence and its associated factors among hypertensive patients attending the Debre Tabor General Hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Integrated blood pressure control. 2017 Jun 16:1-7.
  13. Boima V, Ademola AD, Odusola AO, Agyekum F, Nwafor CE, Cole H, Salako BL, Ogedegbe G, Tayo BO. Factors associated with medication nonadherence among hypertensives in Ghana and Nigeria. International journal of hypertension. 2015;2015(1):205716.
  14. Abegaz TM, Shehab A, Gebreyohannes EA, Bhagavathula AS, Elnour AA. Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(4):e5641.
  15. Kim MT, Hill MN, Bone LR, Levine DM. Development and testing of the Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2000;15(3):90–96.
  16. Alomari A, Alananzeh I, Lord H, Abdulla Al-Lenjawi B, Fernandez R. Medication adherence rate in Arab Patients With cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2022 Sep;33(5):632-41.
  17. Van der Laan DM, Elders PJ, Boons CC, Beckeringh JJ, Nijpels G, Hugtenburg JG. Factors associated with antihypertensive medication non-adherence: a systematic review. Journal of human hypertension. 2017 Nov;31(11):687-94.
  18. Al-Ramahi R. Adherence to medications and associated factors: A cross-sectional study among Palestinian hypertensive patients. Journal of epidemiology and global health. 2015 Jan;5(2):125-32.
  19. Maqadmi AF, Ghannem K, Sebastian J. Assessment of Adherence to Medication and Its Association with Health-Related Quality of Life Among Hypertensive Patients in the United Arab Emirates. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2026 Dec 31:574037.
  20. Al Solami FJ, Correa-Velez I, Hou XY. Factors affecting antihypertensive medications adherence among hypertensive patients in Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2015;5(4):181-9.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Comparison of Varying Doses of Nalbuphine (5 mg vs 10 mg) with 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 40-46
Research Article Open Access
Assessment of Basal and Reflex Tear Secretion In Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 47-50
Research Article Open Access
Hand-Sewn Versus Stapler Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgeries: A Prospective Comparative Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 19-26
Research Article Open Access
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Hem-O-Lok Clips: A Hospital-Based Prospective Observational Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 4 : 27-33
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 3
Citations
8 Views
6 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved