Background: Septicemia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with complex pathogenesis depending on Virulence and pathogen load, as well as host factors. In addition to antimicrobial therapy it is essential to identify any possible source of sepsis as failure of source control is an important reason for treatment failure and disease progression.
Objectives:
Methods: A Prospective Cross-sectional study was done over a period of 1 year with Predefined Inclusion, Exclusion criteria and sample size of 380. Blood samples collected under strict aseptic precautions processed by automated BACTEC system as per manufacturer’s protocols. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done on Mueller Hinton agar using Modified Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion method. Statistical data analyzed using SPSS software, Chi-square test and odds ratio with 95% Confidence intervals.
Results: Out of the 380 samples, 107 (28%) were positive for Bacterial growth, while 184 (48%) samples showed no growth and 89 (23%) showed mixed growth. Gram positive isolates were (63.5%) predominant over Gram negative isolates (36.4%) and Neonates, Pediatric group predominance over adult group. CONS, S.aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia followed by Pseudomonas, E.coli are predominant isolates.
Conclusion: Early Diagnosis and commencement of antimicrobial therapy and appropriate empirical treatment play a vital role in reducing mortality and morbidity. Blood culture, a Gold standard technique in Diagnosis of Sepsis.
Septicemia is defined as a condition in which bacteria circulate and actively multiply in the bloodstream and produce their products like toxins that cause harm to the host, that may or may not be associated with Bloodstream Infections (BSI).Septicemia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among developing and developed nations with complex pathogenesis depending on Virulence and pathogen load, as well as host factors and neonates particularly vulnerable to septicemia because of their weak immune system 1, 2. Septicemia may be mono or polymicrobial in nature and present with nonspecific signs and symptoms like severe febrile episodes of fever, chills, malaise, tachycardia, mental confusion, hyperventilation, hypotension or shock. Infections causing sepsis could be community acquired or hospital acquired, Pneumonia accounts for 50% of causes of sepsis followed by intraabdominal and genitourinary infections. In Hospital settings gram negative infections predominant with most common organisms being Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1. Aim of the study includes To Diagnose and Treat Sepsis ,a medical emergency in order to minimize severity and degree of organ failure as patients with septic shock have a mortality of >40% in contrast to 10% for sepsis cases. In addition to antimicrobial therapy it is essential to identify any possible source of sepsis such as removal of central line, abscess drainage etc. as failure of source control is an important reason for treatment failure and disease progression.
OBJECTIVES
MATERIALS & METHODS
This Prospective Cross-sectional study was done over a period of 1 year from July 2025 to June 2026 in the Department of Microbiology, Navodaya Medical College, and Raichur.
Sample size of this study is calculated with reference to article 5 by using formulae n = Z2p q/d2
Z=1.96 (95% Confidence level), p=42%=0.42, q=1-p=0.58.
n=3.8416×0.2436/0.0025=374.37. So sample size of this study 380.
METHODOLOGY:
Blood samples collected according to standard operational procedures under strict aseptic precautions by proper skin decontamination, 2 sets of adults and pediatric BACTEC bottles per patient and processed by automated BACTEC system as per manufacturer’s protocols.
Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Chi-square test was applied and odds ratio with 95% Confidence intervals were calculated. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULT
During the study period from July 2025 to January 2026, a total of 380 samples with clinical suspicion of septicemia were investigated. Blood samples were collected under strict aseptic precautions and processed for culture. Out of the 380 samples analyzed, 107 (28%) were positive for bacterial growth, while 184 (48%) samples showed no growth and 89 (23%) showed mixed growth and among Culture positive distribution, Gram positive isolates were (63.5%) predominant over Gram negative isolates (36.4%) and age wise Distribution of isolates shows Neonates , Pediatric group predominance over adult group as shown in Tables 1-5 and Figure 1-5.Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing of Gram positive and Gram negative isolates shown in Table 6-7.
Table 1- sample distribution
|
Culture |
Number |
Percentage (%) |
|
Culture Positive |
107 |
28 % |
|
Culture Negative |
184 |
48 % |
|
Mixed culture |
89 |
23 % |
|
Total |
380 |
100 % |
Table 2: Age-wise distribution of culture positive cases
|
Gender |
Number |
Percentage (%) |
|
Adult |
24 |
22 % |
|
Pediatrics including Neonates |
83 |
78 % |
|
Total |
107 |
100 % |
Figure 1: Distribution of Isolates
Figure 2: Age wise distribution
Table 3: Distribution of Isolates
|
Isolate |
Number of isolates |
Percentage (%) |
|
Gram positive isolates |
68 |
63.5% |
|
Gram Negative isolates |
39 |
36.4% |
|
Total |
107 |
100 % |
Figure 3: Percentage %
Table 4: Distribution of Gram positive isolates
|
S.no |
Gram Positive Isolate |
No of Isolates |
Percentage (%) |
|
1. |
CONS |
33 |
49 % |
|
2. |
S.aureus |
32 |
47 % |
|
3. |
Enterococcus |
03 |
04% |
|
|
Total |
68 |
100 % |
Figure 4 : Distribution of Gram positive isolates (n= 68)
Table 5: Distribution of Gram negative isolates
|
S.no |
Gram Negative Isolate |
No of Isolates |
Percentage (%) |
|
1 |
Klebsiella |
21 |
54% |
|
2 |
Pseudomonas |
9 |
23.07% |
|
3 |
E.coli |
3 |
7.7% |
|
4 |
Acinetobacter |
2 |
5.12% |
|
5 |
Citrobacter |
2 |
5.12% |
|
6 |
Proteus |
1 |
2.5% |
|
7 |
Non fermenter |
1 |
2.5% |
|
|
Total |
39 |
100% |
Figure 5: Distribution of Gram Negative isolates (n= 39)
Table 6: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram negative isolates (n= 39)
|
Isolate (39) |
AK |
CIP |
COT |
DOX |
AMC |
CFS |
PTZ |
MRP |
CTX |
|
Klebsiella lla (21) |
6 (28.6% ) |
8 (38%) |
14 (66.6% ) |
8 (38.09 %) |
19 (90.5% ) |
10 (48%) |
11 (52.3%) |
10 (48%) |
12 (57.1%) |
|
Pseudo monas (9) |
3 (33.3% ) |
6 (66.7% ) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
1 (11%) |
5 (55.5%) |
4 (44.4%) |
5 (55.5%) |
4 (44.4%) |
|
E.coli (3) |
1 (33.3% ) |
1 (33.3% ) |
2 (66.6%) |
2 (66.6%) |
3 (100%) |
1 (33.3%) |
1 (33.3%) |
1 (33.3%) |
2 (66.6%) |
|
Acinet obacter (2) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
0 |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
0 |
|
Citroba cter (2) |
1 (50%) |
0 |
1 (50%) |
1 (50%) |
0 |
1 (50%) |
0 |
1 (50%) |
0 |
|
Proteus (1) |
1 (100%) |
1 (100%) |
0 |
0 |
1 (100%) |
1 (100%) |
0 |
0 |
1 (100%) |
|
Non fermenter (1) |
1 (100%) |
11 (100%) |
0 |
1 (100%) |
1 (100%) |
1 (100%) |
1 (100%) |
0 |
0 |
Table 7: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram positive isolates (n= 68)
|
Isolate (68) |
AMP |
A ZM |
CIP |
COT |
DOX |
E |
CD |
G |
LE |
CX |
VA |
LZ |
|
CONS (33) |
16 (48.5 %) |
6 (18.2 %) |
20 (60.6 %) |
16 (48.5%) |
1 (3%) |
1 (3%) |
3 (9% ) |
3 (9%) |
17 (51. 5%) |
19 (57.6 %) |
2 (6%) |
1 (3%) |
|
S.aureus (32) |
18 (15.6 %) |
5 (15.6 %) |
12 (36.3 %) |
18 (15.6%) |
2 (6%) |
1 (3%) |
1 (3% ) |
1 (3%) |
16 (50 %) |
17 (53.1 %) |
1 (3%) |
1 (3%) |
|
Entero coccus (3) |
3 (100 %) |
1 (33.3 %) |
1 (33.3 %) |
3 (100%) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2(66 .7%) |
1 (33.3 %) |
0 |
0 |
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Early Diagnosis and commencement of antimicrobial therapy can play a vital role in reducing mortality and morbidity and appropriate empirical treatment is based on continuous knowledge of causative agents and their resistance patterns. Our study has provided information about likely pathogens in bloodstream Infections and their resistance patterns in the rural setup and Importance of Blood culture as a Gold standard in Diagnosis which help in Diagnosis, formulating Antibiotic policy and avoid indiscriminate antibiotic use.
REFERENCES