International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 1427-1430
Research Article
Awareness of Basic Life Support (BLS) Among Medical, Dental, Nursing Students and Practicing Doctors in RKDF Medical College and Research Centre, Bhopal
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Feb. 27, 2026
Accepted
March 18, 2026
Published
March 26, 2026
Abstract

Background: Basic Life Support (BLS) is a critical lifesaving skill that every healthcare professional must possess. Despite its importance, several studies suggest inadequate knowledge and awareness of BLS among healthcare students and professionals.

Aim: To assess and compare the level of awareness and knowledge regarding Basic Life Support among medical, dental, nursing students, and practicing doctors.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among medical students, dental students, nursing students, and doctors at a tertiary care teaching hospital. A pre-validated structured questionnaire consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions based on current BLS guidelines was used. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and comparative analysis.

Results: A total of 400 participants were included. Overall adequate BLS knowledge was observed in 62% of doctors, 48% of medical students, 41% of nursing students, and 29% of dental students. Prior formal BLS training showed a statistically significant association with higher knowledge scores (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The study highlights significant gaps in BLS awareness among healthcare students and professionals, particularly among dental and nursing students. Regular hands-on BLS training and mandatory certification programs should be incorporated into the curriculum to improve preparedness for medical emergencies.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Sudden cardiac arrest remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Immediate recognition and prompt initiation of Basic Life Support (BLS) significantly improve survival outcomes. BLS includes early recognition of cardiac arrest, activation of emergency response systems, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) (1,2)

 

Healthcare professionals are often the first responders in medical emergencies. Therefore, adequate knowledge and practical skills related to BLS are essential not only for doctors but also for medical, dental, and nursing students. Despite being included in medical curricula, BLS training is often inadequate, irregular, or lacks hands-on exposure (3)

 

This study was undertaken to evaluate and compare awareness and knowledge regarding BLS among different healthcare disciplines.

 

Objectives

  1. To assess the level of awareness and knowledge of BLS among medical, dental, nursing students, and doctors.
  2. To compare BLS knowledge among different healthcare groups.
  3. To determine the impact of prior BLS training on knowledge levels.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

 

Study Setting

A tertiary care teaching hospital and associated medical, dental, and nursing colleges.

 

Study Population

  • Medical students (MBBS)
  • Dental students (BDS)
  • Nursing students (GNM/B.Sc Nursing)
  • Practicing doctors (interns, residents, faculty)

 

Sample Size

400 participants (100 from each group).

 

Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing participants
  • Students and doctors actively enrolled or working in the institution

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants who had undergone formal BLS training within the last 6 months
  • Incomplete questionnaire responses

 

Study Tool

A pre-validated structured questionnaire consisting of:

  • Demographic details
  • Previous exposure to BLS training
  • 20 MCQs based on standard BLS guidelines (CPR steps, compression rate, compression-ventilation ratio, AED usage)

 

Data Analysis

  • Descriptive statistics (mean, percentage)
  • Comparison using Chi-square test
  • p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant

 

RESULTS

Demographic Distribution

  • Mean age: 23.6 ± 4.2 years
  • Male: 52%, Female: 48%

 

Overall BLS Knowledge

Group

Adequate Knowledge (%)

Doctors

62%

Medical Students

48%

Nursing Students

41%

Dental Students

29%

 

Effect of Prior BLS Training

Participants with prior BLS training demonstrated significantly higher scores compared to those without training (p < 0.05).

 

Knowledge Gaps Identified

  • Correct compression rate
  • Compression depth
  • AED sequence
  • Management of choking

 

TABLES

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants

Variable

Doctors (n=100)

Medical Students (n=100)

Dental Students (n=100)

Nursing Students (n=100)

Total (n=400)

Mean Age (years)

32.4 ± 6.8

22.1 ± 2.3

21.9 ± 2.1

23.4 ± 3.2

23.6 ± 4.2

Male (%)

58

55

46

49

52

Female (%)

42

45

54

51

48

Prior BLS Training (%)

64

38

22

35

39.7

 

Table 2: Comparison of Overall BLS Knowledge Scores

Group

Mean Knowledge Score (out of 20)

Adequate Knowledge (%)

Inadequate Knowledge (%)

Doctors

14.8 ± 3.1

62

38

Medical Students

12.2 ± 2.9

48

52

Nursing Students

11.4 ± 2.7

41

59

Dental Students

9.6 ± 2.5

29

71

 

Table 3: Knowledge of Individual BLS Components

BLS Component

Doctors (%)

Medical Students (%)

Dental Students (%)

Nursing Students (%)

Correct compression rate

68

51

32

44

Correct compression depth

65

47

29

40

Compression–ventilation ratio

72

54

35

48

AED usage sequence

61

43

26

38

Management of choking

70

56

34

46

 

Table 4: Association Between Prior BLS Training and Knowledge Level

BLS Training Status

Adequate Knowledge (%)

Inadequate Knowledge (%)

p-value

Trained (n=159)

71.6

28.4

<0.001

Not Trained (n=241)

36.9

63.1

 

Chi-square test applied

  • The comparison of BLS knowledge among different healthcare groups revealed that doctors had significantly higher awareness levels compared to students. Medical students performed better than nursing and dental students. Prior exposure to formal BLS training was strongly associated with higher knowledge scores (p < 0.001). Major deficiencies were noted in knowledge regarding compression depth, AED usage, and choking management.

 

DISCUSSION

The findings of the present study reveal moderate awareness of BLS among doctors and medical students, whereas dental and nursing students demonstrated comparatively inadequate knowledge. Similar trends have been reported in previous Indian and international studies, highlighting insufficient structured and repeated BLS training (3,4)

 

Doctors exhibited better knowledge levels, likely due to greater clinical exposure; however, significant gaps were still identified. This is consistent with studies showing that even practicing healthcare professionals may lack adequate retention of BLS knowledge over time (5,6)

 

The results emphasize the need for continuous medical education, periodic re-certification, and hands-on training programs. Incorporation of simulation-based learning and structured training modules has been shown to significantly enhance both knowledge and practical skills in BLS (7,8)

 

CONCLUSION

Awareness and knowledge of Basic Life Support among healthcare students and professionals are suboptimal, particularly among dental and nursing students. Regular, mandatory BLS training programs with hands-on practice should be implemented across all healthcare disciplines to enhance emergency preparedness and patient outcomes.

 

Recommendations

  • Mandatory BLS certification at entry and exit levels of healthcare courses
  • Annual refresher training programs
  • Integration of simulation-based learning
  • Institutional emergency drills

 

Limitations

  • Single-center study
  • Knowledge assessment without skill evaluation
  • Self-reported questionnaire may introduce bias

 

REFERENCES

  1. American Heart Association. 2020 Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
  2. Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes. Circulation. 2013.
  3. Chandrasekaran S, Kumar S, Bhat SA, et al. Awareness of basic life support among medical, dental, nursing students and doctors. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010.
  4. Zaheer H, Haque Z. Awareness about BLS among healthcare professionals. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2009.
  5. Abolfotouh MA, et al. Knowledge and attitude toward BLS among healthcare workers. BMC Health Services Research. 2017.
  6. Oermann MH, et al. CPR knowledge retention among healthcare providers. Resuscitation. 2011.
  7. Perkins GD, et al. Simulation-based training in resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015.
  8. Nasir N, et al. Effectiveness of BLS training programs among students. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019.
  9. Roshana S, et al. Basic life support: knowledge and attitude of medical/paramedical professionals. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012.
  10. Sharma R, Attar NR. Adult basic life support knowledge among healthcare professionals. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012. 
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Effect of Preoperative Pulmonary Function on Surgical Outcomes
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 1431-1440
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Analysis of Body Mass Index and Its Relationship with the Incidence of Cholelithiasis
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 1419-1426
Research Article Open Access
To Compare the Incidence of Postoperative Pain and Nausea/Vomiting in Thyroidectomy Patients Undergoing General Anaesthesia with Or Without USG Guided B/L Superficial Cervical Plexus Block
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 1391-1397
Research Article Open Access
Phenotypic Characterization of Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Critical Care Areas in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern Gujarat
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 1413-1418
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 2
Citations
4 Views
11 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved