International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 2442-2447
Research Article
Antibiotics Utilization in Otorhinolaryngology Department: An Insight from a Cross-sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital
 ,
 ,
Received
March 6, 2026
Accepted
March 20, 2026
Published
April 11, 2026
Abstract

Background: Rational antibiotic use is critical in Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) due to the high prevalence of both viral and bacterial upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Over-prescription contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

Objective: To evaluate the patterns of antibiotic prescription in the ENT outpatient department using WHO prescribing indicators.

Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted over four months. Data from 891 patient encounters were analyzed for drug class, dosage form, and adherence to the WHO AWaRe classification.

Results: Out of 891 patients, 72% were prescribed at least one antibiotic. Beta lactams were the most frequent (54%), followed by macrolides (19%). The percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name was 100%..

Conclusion: There is a significant reliance on broad-spectrum "Watch" group antibiotics. Implementing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs is essential to align prescribing habits with evidence-based guidelines.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic resistance  has become a serious global health threat in recent years due to its inappropriate use, overuse and incorrect use.[1,2] Selection of antibiotic depends upon the infectious organism and its antibacterial susceptibility .[3] Unsafe usage of antibiotic is harmful and also, risky in patients having an impaired immune system.[4] ENT infections being frequent in the community, prudent use of antibiotics is necessary to prevent emergence of drug resistant bacteria.[5] Few studies have found  that, the pediatric and geriatric population are more prone to develop infections associated with ear, nose and throat. Hence, antibiotic prescription rate is high in the extreme age group.[6] Periodic evaluation of  prescribing behavior is essential in recognizing the current trend of practices and  identifying the errors of omission & commission while prescribing a medicine.[7,8] A variety of factors influence the antibiotic prescribing pattern, including physician preference and  cost.[9].Self-evaluation of pattern of antibiotic utilization using ICMR  guideline will not only be helpful in assessing the quality and cost-effectiveness of  antibiotic usage, but also guide us to select the optimal therapy for a patient depending upon the clinical need.[10]

 

With this background, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the antibiotic drug usage pattern in otorhinolaryngology OPD in a tertiary care hospital and to find the prevalence of inappropriate use of antibiotic using WHO guidelines as reference.

 

METHODOLOGY

2.1 Study Design and Setting

This was a prospective, hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital for a period of four months after obtaining IEC permission.

 

2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

  • Inclusion: Patients attending the Otorhinolaryngology OPD with some clinically diagnosed ENT diseases. [11]
  • Exclusion: Patients with co-morbid conditions, and not willing to participate in the study. [12]

.

2.3 Data Collection and Indicators

Prior to collection of data, written informed consent was taken from each patient. The data were recorded in a pre-designed case record form through direct communication with patients and collecting their prescriptions. The demographic profile, clinical diagnosis, drug details and indication of drug usage were noted. [13]

 

The age and gender distribution of patients, types of various ENT diseases, commonly prescribed antibiotics, their routes of administration and frequency of usage were observed.

 

The prevalence of antibiotic use was found by screening the prescriptions for total no of antibiotic used and mean no of antibiotics per prescription.

 

The primary outcomes were measured using WHO Prescribing Indicators. [14]

  1. Average number of drugs per encounter.
  2. Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name.
  3. Percentage of encounters with an antibiotic.
  4. Percentage of encounters with oral drugs
  5. Percentage of encounters with injectable

Descriptive statistics was applied.Data were entered in Microsoft excel and analysed by Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS), version 16.

 

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

A total of 891 patient records were analyzed. The majority of patients were in the age group of 31–40 years (30%).

 

Table 1: Demographic and Clinical Profile of Patients (n=891)

Variable

Category

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Gender

Male

432

48%

 

Female

459

52%

Department

Outpatient (OPD)

891

100%

 

Inpatient (IPD)

0

0%

Diagnosis

Acute Tonsillopharyngitis

234

26%

 

Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media

171

19%

 

Acute Suppurative Otitis Media

153

17%

 

Otitis Externa

108

12%

 

Table 2: WHO Prescribing Indicators

Indicators

 

WHO Ideal Value

Average number of drugs per encounter

2.7

1.6 – 1.8

Percentage of drugs by generic name

100%

100%

Percentage of encounters with antibiotics

72%

20.0% – 26.8%

     

 

Figure1-Percentage of Different drugs prescribed

 

Figure 2-Percentage of Antibiotics prescribed

 

Table 3: Pattern of Antibiotics Prescribed (WHO AWaRe Classification)

Antibiotic Class

Specific Drug

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

AWaRe Category

Penicillins

Amoxicillin + Clavulanate

   

Access/Watch

Macrolides

Azithromycin

   

Watch

Cephalosporins

Cefixime / Ceftriaxone

   

Watch

Fluoroquinolones

Ciprofloxacin / Levofloxacin

   

Watch

Nitroimidazoles

Metronidazole

   

Access

Export to Sheets

 

DISCUSSION

This was an prospective observational study, which was conducted in the ENT department of a tertiary care hospital. The source of data for the current study involved prescriptions of patients suffering from an ENT condition. The present study reveals the general trend of prescribing pattern of antibiotics in the ENT OPD.

 

A total of 891 prescriptions were analyzed. Among them,459(51.51%) were of females and 432(48.48%) were of males. Similar female predominance was also seen by Daniel M et al and Islam B et al.[11,15]This could be attributed to exposure of females to smoke during cooking, making them more sensitive to infection as compared to males. However, according to Bhat GMN et al. [1] maximum ENT infections are seen in males.

 

Maximum no. of patients were seen between 21-40 yrs of age group in our study.Also, Ziaie T et al.[16] have made similar observation in their study.

 

In this study, ear pathologies were predominant among all  ENT conditions followed by throat and nose pathologies. A study done by Yadav et al.[17] shows higher incidence  of ear infection followed by throat and nose, which is similar to our study. In our study, chronic suppurative otitis media was the most common diagnosis among ear pathologies followed by acute suppurative otitis media and otitis externa. Similar observation was also made by Ziaie T et al.[16] Among nose pathologies, allergic rhinitis and URTI cases were common in our study. Cases of pharyngitis and tonsillitis were frequently seen in our study with throat conditions. This finding correlates well with the study carried by Suman RK et al.[18]

 

On analysing all the prescriptions (891), it was found that ,648(72.72%) prescriptions contained antibiotic drug. This is substantially higher than the WHO recommended limit of 20–27% suggesting a regional culture of "defensive prescribing" where clinicians prescribe antibiotics to prevent secondary bacterial infections, even when a viral etiology is suspected In all antibiotic containing prescriptions (100%), monotherapy was used. Ingel SA et al.[19]had found similar observation in 87% prescriptions. In contrast, only 57% prescriptions contained single antibiotic drug in a study done by Islam B et al.[15] Total number of antibiotics prescribed were 648 and average number of antibiotic per prescription was found to be 0.7 in the present study which is less as compared to findings by Khan et al, Pal et al. and Beg et al, that show average number of antibiotic per prescription as 1.38, 1.49 and 1.64, respectively.[12,20,21] .As most of the antibiotics were prescribed empirically multiple antibiotics were not advised to  avoid resistance and side effects .

 

Beta lactam group of drugs were the most common antibiotic prescribed in this study followed by macrolides and floroquinolones. This  corroborates well with the studies done by Sridevi SA et al.[10]  and Pal et al.[20],whereas study conducted by Khan et al.[12] revealed that, most commonly used were beta lactams, followed by aminoglycosides and macrolides. Macrolides were found to be most frequently advised in the studies by Ingle SA et al .[19]  Among the beta lactams, amoxicillin was frequently prescribed followed by amoxiclav and cefixime. Similar prescription pattern was also observed by Ziaie T et al.[16] .Azithromycin was most frequently advised macrolide in our stud. Among fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin was mostly prescribed as topical drop. followed by ofloxacin. This is in accordance to the finding of Islam B et al.[15] Commonly used fixed dose combination drugs in our study were amoxicillin+clavulanic acid followed by cefpodoxime+clavulanicacid. This is in contrast to the finding of Kumari N et al.[15] ,where cefpodoxime combination was frequently used followed by amoxicillin combination. Broad spectrum antibiotics were advised in our study to provide cover to maximum number of causative micro-organisms.

 

In our study, it was observed that most of the antibiotics (72%) were prescribed for oral administration followed by topical route. It aligns with the study done by Kishore Kumar Y et al.[23] As patients were included from OPD, maximum number of drugs were prescribed orally.

 

A total of  2475 drugs were found in 891 prescriptions.Along with antibiotics(26.18%),other drug categories such as analgesics(24.7%), antihistaminics(22.9%), antacids(13%), and nasal drops(13%) were prescribed in our study.Similar concomitant group of drugs were also found to be prescribed in the studies done by Islam B et al.[15] and Suman RK et al.[18] All these drugs play important role in ENT disorders.

 

Antibiotics were the most common prescribed drugs in our study followed by analgesics and antihistaminics. This aligns with the finding of  Rehan HS. .[24] However, Ingles SA et al(19) reported antihistaminic as the most commonly prescribed drug in their study.

 

Polypharmacy is related to adverse drug reaction, drug interaction ,increased cost and development of bacterial resistance. .[25] The average number of drugs per prescription in our study was 2.7,which is consistent with the studies done in Brazil .[26] and Nepal.[27] ,where it was 2.4 and 2.91 respectively. Various other studies have reported average number of drugs per prescription as more than 3. .[5,10,15,18,22,23] It is preferable to keep this value as low as possible to avoid polypharmacy.

 

All the drugs (100%) were prescribed in generic name in this study. Similar trend was found in study done by Isaac. [28] and Silfwerbrand et al.[29] ,where most of drugs were prescribed by its generic name. Generic  drugs are cheaper than branded drugs making them accessible to all patients. This is in contrast to the findings of Rehman et al. [5], Sridevi SA et al.[10] , Daniel M et al.[11] , Begum MM et al.[13], Islam B et al.[15] , Suman RK et al.[18] , Kumari N et al.[22] and Kishore Kumar Y et al(23),.,where brand names were mostly prescribed. This could be due to physician’s trust over brands, better availability and good patient compliance.

 

In our study, percentage encounter with antibiotic was 72.72%. In contrast to this finding ,Rehman et al.[5]  and Suman RK et al.[18] had observed percentage encounter with an antibiotic as 47% and 32% respectively. It could be attributed to increased occurrence of ENT related infections in our geographical area.

 

In our study,79.63% drugs were advised for oral administration and 18.9% drugs for topical application. Only 1.4% injectables were advised. Similar observation was also made by Rehman et al.[5] and Kishore Kumar Y et al.[23]

 

No case of adverse drug reaction was reported in the present study. Format of prescriptions in relation to dose, duration and frequency was complete in 100% prescriptions.

 

Despite providing insights into the various aspects of drug prescribing pattern, quality of use and determinants of use, this study has got few limitations .The quality of diagnosis and appropriateness of drug choices were beyond the scope of the study, Pharmacovigilance could have been noticed, which was nil during the study period.

 

CONCLUSION

From our observation in this study, it may be concluded that, the overall pattern of antibiotic utilization in ENT OPD was appropriate in many aspects as per the guidelines. All efforts were made to  improve the quality of health care.

 

To combat AMR, we recommend:

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS): Implementing "Antibiotic Time-outs" to review therapy after 48 hours.
  • Point-of-Care Testing: Using Rapid Antigen Detection Tests (RADT) for Group A Strep to differentiate viral from bacterial pharyngitis.
  • Continuous Medical Education: Training residents on the WHO AWaRe classification.

 

Acknowledgement

We thank all the patients and their family members for active participation in the study. We also thank all the faculties and staff of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Shri Jagannath Medical College and Hospital, Puri, Odisha for their help during data collection.

 

Conflict of interest

All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work and they have no financial relationships with any organization that might have an interest in the submitted work. There are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

 

Funding source

No financial support was received from any source for the submitted work.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Bhat GMN, Holla R, Shrinath D. Kamath P. A study of prescription pattern in the drug therapy of ear, nose, and throat infections at a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;4(4):686-690.
  2. Kancherla D, M V Satya Sai, HJ Gayathri Devi,Sharma S. A study on prescribing pattern of antibiotics in respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care center. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 2015;6(6):4558-4563.
  3. Kiivet RA, Dahl ML, Llerena A, Maimets M, Wettermark B, Berecz R. Antibiotic use in 3 European university hospitals. Scand J Infect Dis 1998;30:277-80.
  4. Alqenae FA, Steinke D, Keers RN. Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following discharge from hospital to community settings: A systematic review. Drug Saf 2020; 43 : 517-37.
  5. Rehman et al. To evaluate drug utilization pattern among ENT patients in a tertiary care hospital of North Kashmir.World Journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences.2022;11(8):1622-1638.
  6. Chang SC, Chang HJ, Lai MS. Antibiotic usage in primary care units in Taiwan. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 1999;11:23-30.
  7. Yilma Z, Liben M. Assessment of drug prescription pattern in Mekelle General Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia, using World Health Organization prescribing indicators. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:3809157.
  8. Joshi, et al.: Assessment of prescriptions using WHO indicators. Indian Journal of Pharmacology.2022;54(5).
  9. Zulekha, et al.: Antibiotic Utilization in Otitis Media and Otitis Externa.Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice., 2023; 16(3):217-220.
  10. Sridevi SA et al. Drug utilization study in the otorhinolaryngology department in a tertiary care hospital.Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jun;2(3):306-310.
  11. Merin Daniel et.al. Drug Utilization Trends in ENT Outpatients. International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research,2018;3(4).
  12. Khan et al. Patterns of prescription of antimicrobial agents in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary care teaching hospital . Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.2011 ;5(14):1732-1738.
  13. Begum MM et al. Analysis of prescription pattern of antibiotic drugs on patients suffering from ENT infection within Dhaka Metropolis, Bangladesh.Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;6(2):257-264.
  14. Coco AS, Horst MA, Gambler AS. Trends in broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing for children with acute otitis media in the United States, 1998-2004. BMC pediatrics. 2009;9:1.
  15. Islam B et al. Current trends in prescribing antimicrobial drugs on patients suffering from ENT infection. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2018; 27(2) : 155-160.
  16. Ziaie T. et al., Trends of antimicrobial prescription in department of otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Res. Chron., 2015, 2 (1), 44-50.
  17. Yadav P, Kanase V, Lacchiramka P, Jain S. Drug utilization trends in ENT out patient department in a teaching hospital. Int J Pharma Bio Sci 2010;1:153.
  18. Suman RK et al. Drug Usage Patterns in Ent Out Patients Department of Teaching Hospital. IJSR. Jul 2014;7(3)
  19. Ingle SA et al. Determination of the drug utilization patterns of antimicrobial agents used in the department of ear, nose and throat at a tertiary care teaching hospital Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol.Sep 2022 ;11(5):453-459
  20. Pal A, Bhowmick S, Basu J, Chattopadhyay R, Paul SS, Chattopadhyay S. Study on prescribing pattern of antimicrobials in ENT department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Bihar,India. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2015; 4( 8): 1839-1852.
  21. Beg MA, Bawa S, Dutta S, Anjoom M, Vishal S. Study of antimicrobial prescribing pattern in a tertiary care teaching hospital at Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. Dec 2016 ;5(6):2444-2448.
  22. Kumari N et al. Prescription Pattern of Drugs Prescribed in Out Patient Department of ENT and Adverse Drug Reactions Reported from ENT Department in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Bihar. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 2022; 73(2): 178-183.
  23. Kishore Kumar Y et al. Drug utilization pattern in ENT OPD of government tertiary care teaching hospital in Raigarh. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 2017;3(4):1042-1045.
  24. Rehan HS. Pattern of drug utilization in acute tonsillitis in a teaching hospital in Nepal. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;55(3):176.
  25. Charatan F. Family compensated for death after illegible prescription. BMJ. 1999;319:1456.
  26. Acurcio FA, Perini E, Magalhães SMS, Terceiro LGV, Filho JMV, Coutinho KEAO M et al. Analysis of medical prescriptions dispensed at health centers in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro. 2004 jan-fev;20(1):72-79.
  27. Alam K, Mishra P, Prabhu M, Shankar PR, Palaian S, Bhandari RB, et al. A study on rational drug prescribing and dispensing in outpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Western Nepal. Kathmandu University medical journal(KUMJ). 2006;4(4):436–443.
  28. Isaac S, Jayakumari S, Lekshmi RS. A Prospective study on the Drug prescribing pattern of Antibiotics in the Ears, Nose and Throat department of a Tertiary Care Hospital. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019;12(12):6001-6.
  29. Silfwerbrand E, Verma S, Sjökvist C, Stålsby Lundborg C, Sharma M. Diagnose-Specific Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns at Otorhinolaryngology Inpatient Departments of Two Private Sector Healthcare Facilities in Central India: A Five-Year Observational Study. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2019;16(21):4074.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Evaluation of Transdermal Diclofenac Patch Versus Conventional Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 2626-2630
Research Article Open Access
A Retrospective Study of Evaluation of Fetomaternal Outcome of Antenatal Syphilis Treated with three Doses of Injection Benzathine Penicillin in Tertiary Care Centre
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 2604-2608
Research Article Open Access
A Comparative Study on Outcome of Open (Milligan-Morgan) Haemorrhoidectomy and Harmonic Scalpel Haemorrhoidectomy in Management of Grade Iii/Iv Haemorrhoids
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 2506-2514
Research Article Open Access
A Study to Evaluate Levels of Serum Vitamin-D and Testosterone in Patients Admitted to ICU with Sepsis
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 2597-2603
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 2
Citations
10 Views
15 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved