International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 3 : 1-3
Original Article
A cross-sectional study regarding correlation between procrastination and perceived stress among medical students in Badaun, Uttar Pradesh
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
March 12, 2026
Accepted
April 23, 2026
Published
May 3, 2026
Abstract

Background: Procrastination, the act of delaying or postponing tasks, is a common challenge faced by individuals, particularly in high-pressure environments like medical education. Medical education presents demanding and potentially daunting requirements for students globally, which has become a significant concern of stress. This study aimed to explore the relationship between procrastination and perceived stress among medical students in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Government medical college in Uttar Pradesh. The sample comprised 225 MBBS students aged 18 years and above. The Assessments included the Procrastination Assessment Scale-Students (PASS), The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Data were entered in Excel and analyzed using SPSS 23 with descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Spearman’s Correlation for comparisons.

Results: The findings revealed that 90(40%) of the participants exhibited high levels of procrastination, with 80(35.56%) at a moderate level and 55(24.44%) showing low procrastination. Moderate perceived stress was prevalent among 170(75.56%) of students. A statistically significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.18) was observed between procrastination and perceived stress, indicating that students with higher procrastination scores reported increased levels of stress.

Conclusion: This study highlights the detrimental impact of procrastination on the perceived stress levels of medical students, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to manage procrastination and reduce stress in academic settings. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving not only academic performance but also the overall well-being of medical students. Future research should aim to establish causality and include broader demographic samples to further understand this relationship.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Procrastination is commonly conceptualized as an irrational tendency to delay required tasks or assignments despite the negative effects of this postponement on individuals and organisations1. Poets have even written figuratively about procrastination, with such phrases as “Procrastination is the Thief of Time,”2. The current culture in medical schools often demands that medical students be faultless and flawless. Characteristics, such as impeccable performance, high competency in the medical field, and awareness of detail, are generally expected of medical students and physicians. Therefore, medical students may set too perfect standards for academic tasks and it may be difficult to complete tasks that meet high standards, which puts pressure on themselves.

Academic procrastination tends to occur frequently when the absolute amount of academic tasks increases, and the task becomes more complex and stressful3,4.Research has shown that over 70% of university students experience procrastination in relation to their academic tasks and approximately 58% of undergraduate students report procrastinating for three hours or more in a day. Higher frequencies of sadness (46.59%) and procrastination (47.12%) have been observed in medical students5,6. Perceived stress is not about measuring the frequency of stressful events rather it is about how an individual feels about the general stressfulness of his life and the ability to handle such stress7.

 

Medical education has been reported throughout the world as one of the most stressful academic curricula, which negatively affects the physical and mental health of medical students. Fear of examinations, high parental expectations, peer pressure, lack of leisure time, financial problems, relationship disharmony, and aspirations of higher studies are some of the many factors known to contribute to the development of stress in undergraduate medical students8,9.A minor level of stress is beneficial and enables the student to become a more dynamic and better performer. Conversely, persistently high levels of stress may cause considerable psychological and physical glitches like poor academic performance, stress-related anxiety, depression, drug use, and even suicide10,11. The present study investigated Procrastination and the perceived stress level as well as reasons and sources of stress among medical students.

 

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among the students of a government Medical College in Uttar Pradesh. The study was conducted over a three-month study period from June 2023- March 2024. The sample comprised 225 MBBS students from the 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 batches. MBBS students aged 18 years and above were asked to participate in the study and explained about the study’s purpose, voluntary nature of participation, confidentiality of responses, and their right to withdraw at any time without consequences. Students who were willing to participate, with written informed consent obtained prior to participation and those who understood the study’s purpose were included in the study. Students who were absent during data collection, unable to participate due to illness, did not provide consent, or missed any assignment or weekly test were excluded from the study.

 

Measures

Procrastination Assessment Scale-Students (PASS)

Procrastination assessment scale-students (PASS) is extensively used to measure academic procrastination among students (Solomon and Rothblum, 1984). Procrastination Assessment Scale- students (PASS) has two parts, first part has six academic tasks: writing a term paper, studying for exams, and weekly assignments, performing administrative tasks, taking part in meetings and performing academic tasks in general. In six tasks, the participants have to accomplish three rating scales which indicate the frequency with which they procrastinate on that task (1 = Never procrastinate, 5 = Always procrastinate) whether their procrastination on the task is a problem (1 = Not at all a problem, 5 = Always a problem) and in case of to decrease their procrastination on the task (1 = Do not want to decrease 5 = Definitely want to decrease) (Solomon and Rothblum, 1984). The sum of PASS items delivers an overall academic procrastination measure with total scores ranging from 12-60. Higher scores demonstrate a higher level of academic procrastination. The second part of the PASS asks respondents to think about when last time they felt procrastination during writing a term paper and have to identify the reason for procrastination. Self-reported procrastination comprises both frequent delay and stress and it takes time to accomplish a task in this situation. Previous studies describe that higher procrastinators lessen delay only when a person’s stress reaches a peak (Solomon et al., 1983)13.

 

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is the most widely used psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one’s life are appraised as stressful. The questions in the PSS ask about feelings and thoughts during the last month. In each case, respondents are asked how often they felt a certain way. Scoring: PSS scores are obtained by reversing responses (e.g., 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1 & 4 = 0) to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7, & 8) and then summing across all scale items. A short 4 item scale can be made from questions 2, 4, 5 and 10 of the PSS 10 item scale14.

 

Data Analysis-The collected data was analysed through a quantitative technique using SPSS®23.  Chi square test was used to compare the differences in procrastination, PASS and PSS between high and low-procrastination students. Spearman’s Correlationwas conducted to examine the correlation between procrastination and stress. Differences were considered statistically significant if the p-value was less than 0.05.

 

RESULTS

The study included a total sample of 225 medical students, comprising 133 males and 92 females. The participants were categorized based on their procrastination levels (low, moderate, and high) and perceived stress levels (low, moderate, and high). Gender differences in procrastination and stress were analyzed to determine any significant associations.

 

Table 1: Comparison Of Procrastination Level and stress level In Male And Female Students

Gender

Procrastination Level

Total

p-Value

Low

Medium

High

Male

35(26.32%)

45(33.83%)

53(39.85%)

133(100%)

0.69

Female

20(21.74%)

35(38.04%)

37(40.22%)

92(100%)

Total

55(24.44%)

80(35.56%)

90(40.00%)

225(100%)

Gender

Perceived Stress Level

Total

p-Value

Low

Medium

High

Male

18(13.53%)

97(72.93%)

18(13.53%)

133(100%)

0.54

Female

9(9.78%)

73(79.35%)

10(10.87%)

92(100%)

Total

27(12.00%)

170(75.56%)

28(12.44)

225(100%)

 

Table 1 demonstrated that there was no significant association between gender and procrastination level and stress level among the students. 40.2% of students who had high procrastination levels were females compared to 39.8% of males, while 38% of students who had moderate procrastination degrees were female compared to 33.8% males. Regarding perceived stress levels13.5% of students who had high perceived stress levels were males compared to 10.8% females.

Table 2: Comparison Of Procrastination and stress Among Different MBBS Batches

Batch

Procrastination Level

Total

p-Value

Low

Medium

High

2019

14(19.44%)

29(40.28%)

29(40.28%)

72(100%)

0.29

2020

17(33.33%)

15(29.41%)

19(37.26%)

51(100%)

2021

8(17.02%)

21(44.68%)

18(38.30%)

47(100%)

2022

16(29.09%)

15(27.27%)

24(43.64%)

55(100%)

Total

55(24.44%)

80(35.56%)

90(40.00%)

225(100%)

Batch

Perceived Stress Level

Total

p-Value

Low

Medium

High

2019

6(8.33%)

58(80.56%)

8(11.11%)

72(100%)

0.52

2020

5(9.80%)

40(78.43%)

6(11.74%)

51(100%)

2021

5(10.64%)

35(74.47%)

7(14.89%)

47(100%)

2022

11(20.00%)

37(67.27%)

7(12.73%)

55(100%)

Total

27(12.00%)

170(75.56%)

28(12.44%)

225(100%)

 

Table 2 presents the distribution of students among three levels of procrastination and stress level among the four batches (2019-2022) of students. The majority of students (40%) exhibited high procrastination, followed by 35.56% with moderate and 24.44% with low procrastination. Across batches, high procrastination levels fluctuated, decreasing from 40.28% in 2019 to 37.26% in 2020, rising to 38.30% in 2021, and peaking at 43.64% in 2022. A similar trend was observed in moderate procrastination, while low procrastination showed greater variability, ranging from 17.02% (2021) to 33.33% (2020).

Regarding perceived stress, moderate stress was the most prevalent across all batches, with proportions ranging from 67.27% (2022) to 80.56% (2019). High stress peaked in 2021 (14.89%) before declining in 2022 (12.73%), while low stress showed a notable increase in 2022 (20.00%). No significant differences in stress levels between batches.

Table 3.The Correlation Between Procrastination And Perceived Stress In Medical Students

Stress Level

Procrastination Level

Total

Spearman Correlation

p-Value

Low Procrastination

Medium Procrastination

High Procrastination

Low

Stress

13(48.15%)

8(29.63%)

6(22.22%)

27(100%)

 

 

 

0.18

 

 

 

0.009

Moderate Stress

38(22.35%)

61(35.88%)

71(41.76%)

170(100%)

High Stress

4(14.29%)

11(39.28%)

13(46.43%)

28(100%)

Total

55(24.44%)

80(35.56%)

90(40.00%)

225(100%)

 

A statistically significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.18, p = 0.009) was observed between procrastination and perceived stress, indicating that higher procrastination levels are associated with increased stress among medical students.

 

Discussion

The present study found that procrastination is highly prevalent among medical students, with 40% of participants exhibiting high procrastination levels, 35% showing moderate procrastination, and 24% showing low procrastination. These findings suggest that a significant proportion of medical students struggle with delaying academic tasks, which could negatively impact their performance and well-being. A study by Minra Tahir et al. supports this, showing that 52.5% of students exhibited high levels of procrastination and 47.5% having low procrastination level15.

 

When analyzing gender differences, the proportion of high procrastinators was nearly equal among male (39.85%) and female (40.22%) students, indicating that both genders experience similar academic pressures and procrastination tendencies. This contrasts with some previous studies that suggest gender-based variations in procrastination behaviors and stress responses.Based on the results by Hyat et al, there was a significant difference between the male and female students regarding the level of Procrastination, the female ones were less procrastinator than the male students16.

 

The present study depicts that the proportion of students with low procrastination levels,which was 24.44% shows more fluctuation, with the lowest percentageof 17.02%in 2021(IIND) year and the highest percentage of 33.33%in 2020 (IIIRD) year 33.33%, & 29% in 2023 (Ist)year batch of MBBS students. But in a study by Manya Tahir et al., The low procrastinators were 51% in the 1st year, 54% in the 2nd year and 53% in the 3rd year17.

 

The study found that second-year students from the 2021 batch exhibited the greatest prevalence of stress, at 14.89%, followed by first-year students from the 2022 batch at 12.73%, third-year students from the 2020 batch at 11.74%, and final-year students at 11.11%.

 

In another study by Melaku et al The highest prevalence of stress was observed among the first-year students at 58.3%, followed by the second-year students at 57.0%, the third-year students at 48.9%, the fourth-year students at 56.6%, and the fifth-year students at 50.0%.18The high percentage of students in the moderate stress category highlights the demanding nature of medical education. Although some level of stress can be beneficial for motivation and performance, prolonged exposure to high stress may lead to burnout, anxiety, and reduced academic efficiency.

 

A statistically significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.18, p = 0.009) was found between procrastination and perceived stress. This indicates that students who procrastinate more tend to experience higher levels of stress. This relationship may be explained by the fact that procrastination leads to task accumulation, increased workload pressure, and last-minute cramming, which can contribute to heightened stress and anxiety. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing procrastination as a strategy to reduce stress levels among medical students. Similar study by Fuschia M. Sirois et al. has shown that the relationship between chronic procrastination and poor health is largely attributable to increased levels of stress experienced by individuals who engage in chronic procrastination.19Another related study by Laybourn et al. demonstrated that procrastination even among educators is associated with amplified stress among students.20The study found no significant association between gender and procrastination (p = 0.69) or gender and stress levels (p = 0.54).The findings of the current study align with those reported by Johansson et al., which indicate no significant relationship between gender and the procastination.21However, several prior research has demonstrated a pronounced disparity in stress levels among female participants compared to males and other gender.21-23

 

The findings of this study have several important implications. Firstly, the pervasive nature of procrastination and stress among medical students, which could lead to adverse academic and mental health outcomes if left unaddressed. Secondly, the strong positive correlation observed between procrastination and perceived stress underscores the critical need for comprehensive interventions that target both the improvement of time management skills and the development of effective coping strategies among medical students. Given the significant proportion of medical students experiencing high levels of procrastination and stress, it is imperative that educational institutions and policymakers prioritize the development and implementation of comprehensive support programs.

 

Limitations

This study relied on self-reported information from students, which may have introduced reporting bias. Additionally, perceptions of stress levels can vary among individuals and fluctuate throughout the year.

 

CONCLUSION

The study reveals a significant positive correlation between procrastination and perceived stress among medical students, indicating that higher levels of procrastination are associated with increased stress. With 40% of participants exhibiting high procrastination levels and a prevalent moderate stress level reported by 75.56% of the students, the findings highlight the challenging academic environment faced by medical students. This relationship underscores the importance of addressing procrastination not only as a behavioral issue but also as a contributing factor to stress management in educational settings.

Interventions aimed at reducing procrastination could be vital in alleviating stress among medical students, potentially improving their academic performance and overall well-being. Future research is necessary to explore causal relationships and the effects of varying cultural contexts, while also considering larger sample sizes to enhance the validity of the results.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Lay C. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination.  Res. Personal. 20, 474–495. 10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3 
  2. Ferrari J. R., Johnson J. L., McCown W. G. (1995). Procrastination and Task Avoidance: Theory, Research, and Treatment. US: Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0227-6
  3. Steel P. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(1):65–94
  4. Solomon LJ, Rothblum ED. Academic procrastination: frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. J Couns Psychol. 1984;31(4):503–509.
  5. Shah SIA, Mumtaz A, Chughtai AS. Subjective happiness and aca- demic procrastination among medical students: the dilemma of unhappy and lazy pupils. PRAS. 2017;1:008.
  6. Mahasneh AM, Bataineh OT, Al-Zoubi ZH. The relationship between academic procrastination and parenting styles among Jordanian undergraduate university students. Open Psy J. 2016;9(1):25–34. doi:10.2174/1874350101609010025
  7. Varghese RP, Norman T, Thavaraj S. Perceived stress and self efficacy among college students: A global review. Int J Hum Resour Manage Res. 2015;5:15–24.
  8. Gupta S, Choudhury S, Das M, Mondol A, Pradhan R. Factors causing stress among students of a medical college in Kolkata, India. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2015;28:92-5.
  9. Abraham RR, Zulkifli EM, Fan ES, Xin GN, Lin JI. A report on stress among first year students in an Indian medical school. Southeast Asian J Med Educ. 2009;3:78–81.
  10. Gomathi KG, Ahmed S, Sreedharan J. Psychological health of first-year health professional students in a medical university in the United Arab Emirates. SultanQaboos Uni Med J. 2012;12:206–13.
  11. Siddiqui MA, Jahan F, Mitwally M, Al Zubidi NS, Al Zubidi HS. Perception of stress, anxiety, depression and coping strategies among medical students at Oman medical college. Middle East J Family Med. 2016;14:16–23.Return to ref 9 in article
  12. Dafaalla M, Farah A, Bashir S, Khalil A, Abdulhamid R, Mokhtar M, et al. Depression, anxiety, and stress in Sudanese medical students: a cross sectional study on role of quality of life and social support. Am J Educ Res. 2016;4:937–42.
  13. Solomon, L. J., &Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Procrastination Assessment Scale-Students (PASS)1. In J. Fischer & K. Corcoran (Eds.), Measures for clinical practice (pp. 446452). New York: The Free Press.
  14. [Internet].[cited2023Sept8].Availablefrom:https://www.das.nh.gov/wellness/Docs/Percieved%20Stress%20Scale.pdf
  15. Tahir M, Yasmin R, Wajih M, Butt U, Gul S, Aamer S, et al. Introduction Exploring the level of academic procrastination and possible coping strategies among medical students. Available from: https://www.jpma.org.pk/PdfDownload/11197.
  16. Hayat, A. A., Kojuri, J., & Amini, M. (2020). Academic procrastination of medical students: The role of Internet addiction. PubMed, 8(2), 83 89.https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2020.85000.1159.
  17. Manya Tahir, Rahila Yasmin, Muhammad Wajih Uddin Butt, Seema Gul, Sidra Aamer, Nabeela Naeem. Exploring the level of academic procrastination and possible coping strategies among medical students. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2022 Apr 5;72(4):629–33. doi:10.47391/jpma.0710 .
  18. Melaku L, Mossie A, Negash A. Stress among Medical Students and Its Association with Substance Use and Academic Performance. Journal of Biomedical Education. 2015 Dec 2;2015(4):1–9.
  19. Sirois FM, Stride CB, Pychyl TA. Procrastination and health: A longitudinal test of the roles of stress and health behaviours. Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Sep;28(3):860-875. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12658. Epub 2023 Mar 15. PMID: 36919887.
  20. Laybourn S, Frenzel AC, Fenzl T. Teacher Procrastination, Emotions, and Stress: A Qualitative Study. Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 11;10:2325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02325. PMID: 31681115; PMCID: PMC6798067.
  21. Johansson F, Rozental A, Edlund K, Côté P, Sundberg T, Onell C, Rudman A, Skillgate E. Associations Between Procrastination and Subsequent Health Outcomes Among University Students in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249346. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49346. PMID: 36598789; PMCID: PMC9857662.
  22. Sanfui B, Augustine ATV, Pillai RS, Redhu A. Exploring the Stress Landscape: An In-Depth Analysis of Perceived Stress, Contributing Factors and Its Effect on Sleep among Medical Students in Bangalore–A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;16(1):680-4.
  23. Graves BS, Hall ME, Dias-Karch C, Haischer MH, Apter C. Gender differences in perceived stress and coping among college students. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0255634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255634. PMID: 34383790; PMCID: PMC8360537.
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Efficacy of High Thoracic (T2) Erector Spinae Plane Block with Mgso4 as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Shoulder Arthroscopy
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3918-3927
Research Article Open Access
Understanding Social Organization and Dependency of Geriatric Population in Rural Community of East Champaran, Bihar, India: A Cross-Sectional Study
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3910-3917
Research Article Open Access
Retrospective study of Latent Tuberculosis infection among contacts of tuberculosis patients
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3855-3858
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Study between Open CBD Exploration and Laparoscopic CBD Exploration in Choledocholithiasis Patients in a Tertiary Care Centre
2026, Volume-7, Issue 2 : 3847-3854
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 3
Citations
9 Views
13 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved