International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 1739-1746
Original Article
A cross-sectional analytical study of thyroid dysfunction in metabolic syndrome in a tertiary care center. Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Received
Jan. 10, 2026
Accepted
Jan. 25, 2026
Published
Feb. 13, 2026
Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors linked to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk. Thyroid dysfunction, particularly hypothyroidism, may exacerbate these risks by affecting lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and body weight. Data on this association in India are limited. Aims and objectives: To determine the prevalence and types of thyroid dysfunction in MetS patients and evaluate its association with MetS components in a tertiary care setting. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 85 patients with MetS, diagnosed using International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, at a tertiary care centre in Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh. Thyroid function was assessed by measuring serum T4 and TSH levels. Metabolic parameters, including waist circumference (WC), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), fasting blood sugar (FBS), total cholesterol (TC), HDL, and triglycerides (TGL), were recorded. Fischer’s exact test and Pearson’s correlation were used for statistical analysis. Results: Thyroid dysfunction was observed in18.8%of patients, with subclinical hypothyroidism (14.1%) being the most common, followed by overt hypothyroidism (3.5%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (1.2%). Subclinical hypothyroidism was significantly associated with fulfilling three or more MetS criteria (p=0.002) and was more prevalent in females (83.3%, p=0.049). No significant correlations were found between T4/TSH and MetS components. Conclusion: Sub clinical hypothyroidism is prevalent in Indian MetS patients and is associated with more severe MetS profiles, particularly in females. Routine thyroid screening in MetS patients may aid in early identification of cardiovascular risk factors

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by a constellation of interconnected risk factors, including central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and impaired glucose tolerance, which collectively elevate the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and chronic kidney disease. [1,2] The global prevalence of MetS is rising, with estimates in Indiareaching30% in2020, driven by urbanization, sedentary lifestyles, and dietary shifts. [3,4] Thyroid hormones play a critical role in regulating metabolism, influencing lipid profiles, glucose homeostasis, and cardiovascular function. [5,6] Thyroid dysfunction, particularly hypothyroidism, is implicated in exacerbating MetS components by promoting dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension. [7,8]

 

Hypothyroidism, both overt and subclinical, is associated with increased serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)levels, as well as reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, contributing to atherogenesis. [9,10] Sub clinical hypothyroidism, defined by elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels with normal free thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3), is particularly relevant, as it may represent an early stage of thyroid dysfunction with significant metabolic implications. [11] Previous studies have reported a higher prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in MetS patients, with TSH levels at the upper limit of the normal range correlating with obesity, hyper triglyceridemia, andMet Srisk.[12,13]Further more, thyroid hormones influence blood pressure regulation through effects on cardiac output, vascular resistance, and sympathetic nervous system activity, potentially compounding hypertension in   MetS.[14,15]

 

Aim of the study

Despite these associations, data on thyroid dysfunction in MetS patients in India, particularly in rural and semi-urban populations, are limited. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and types of thyroid dysfunction in MetS patients attending a tertiary care center Kurnool District and to assess their associations with MetS components. By elucidating these relationships, we seek to inform clinical strategies for early detection and management of thyroid dysfunction to reduce cardiovascular risk in MetS patients.

 

METHODOLOGY

Study subjects: Patients visiting Out Patient Department in Department of General Medicine, Viswabharathi Medical College, Kurnool who satisfy the inclusion criteria.

 

Study design: Cross sectional Analytical study.

 

Sampling method: Consecutive sampling method.

 

Study period:18months from January 2024 to June2025

 

Sample size: According to Navin B, K.E. Arumugam et al study 30 considering the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome as 16.7% with a precision of 8% and 95% confidence interval, the sample size is calculated as

N = Z2*p*(1-p)/d2

Z1-α/2-two tailed probability for 95% confidence interval=1.96

p (%) - prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome = 0.167d(%) -precision or allow able error for thyroid dysfunction in patients with MetS =0.08 N = 1.96^2 * 0.167 * (1 - 0.167) / 0.08^2

N=83.5.

Then sample size rounded to 85.

 

Study setting

Department of General Medicine, Viswabharathi Medical College, a tertiary care hospital,

 

Sampling procedure

After ethical approval, eligible participants from the General Medicine OPD were enrolled with informed consent. Medical history, anthropometric measurements (height, weight, waist circumference), and seated blood pressure were recorded. Fasting blood samples were analyzed for glucose, lipid profile, and thyroid function using semi-automated and automated analyzers. Waist circumference was measured midway between the lowest rib and iliac crest during normal expiration. Blood pressure was reassessed after15 minutes of rest in supine position with the cuff at heart level. Laboratory analyses included enzymatic methods for glucose/lipids and chemiluminescence immunoassay for thyroid hormones.

 

Inclusión criteria:

Patients fulfilling the Any three of the following criteria of NCEPATPIII.31

 

Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

Fasting plasma glucose ≥110mg/dl (6.1mmol/L)

Abdominal Obesity

Waist Circumference

>102cm (40 inches) in men

>88 cm(35inches) in women

Hypertriglyceridemia

≥150mg/dl (1.7mmol/L) or drug treatment for high triglycerides

Low levels of HDL

<40 mg/dl (1 mmol/L) in men<50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/L in women or on drug treatment for low HDL

Hypertension

≥130/85mmHg or drug treatment for hypertension

 

Exclusion criteria

  • Age less than 30 and above 70
  • Pregnant
  • Patients with Cardiovascular disorder
  • Iodine deficient
  • Patient taking medications for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, thyroid disorders,
  • Patients who were not giving

 

DataCollection

Demographic data, including age and gender, were recorded. Anthropometric measurements, such as height, weight, and waist circumference, were obtained using standardized techniques. Blood pressure was measured using a calibrated sphygmomanometer. Fasting blood samples were collected to assess fasting blood sugar (FBS),total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and thyroid function tests(T4andTSH).Thyroid function status was categorized as euthyroid (normal T4 and TSH), hypothyroidism (TSH >10 mU/L with low T4), subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH 4.5–10 mU/L with normal T4), or subclinical hyperthyroidism (TSH 0.1–0.4 mU/L with normal T4 [17, 18]

 

StatisticalAnalysis

Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, medians, and percentages, were calculated for continuous and categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess associations between thyroid function status, gender, age categories. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using software SPSS version 25.

 

Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Viswabharathi Medical College a tertiary care hospital. Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, South India. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and data confidentiality was maintained in accordance with ethical guidelines.

 

RESULTS

The study included 85 patients (58.8%male, 41.2%female)

Fig1: Gender distribution among study subjects (N=85)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

Table1: Descriptive statistics of age among study population(N=85)

Parameter

Age in years

Mean

44.13

Median

43.00

Mode

40

Std.Deviation

8.806

Minimum

21

Maximum

67

 

Table no.1shown that mean±SD among study population was 44.13 years±8.81.The minimum age studied was 21 years and maximum 67 years.

Fig 2: Age & gender distribution among study population(N=85)

 

Fig no. 2 shown that 37out of 85(43.5%) study subjects belonged to <40 years of age group out of which 27(73%) were females and 10(27%) were males. 30 of 85 (35.3%) belonged to 41-50 years with 15 males and 15 females. 13 (15%) belonged to 51 to 60 years with 8 females and 5 males. 5 (5.9%) belonged to >61 years and all were males.

 

Table2: Descriptive Statistics of Metabolic Parameters (N=85)

Parameter

Height (cm)

Weight (kg)

Waist Circumference (cm)

Mean

158.46

70.46

96.69

Median

159

70

96

Mode

162

65

92

Standard Deviation

8.39

11.48

7.34

Minimum

142

52

80

Maximum

176

110

116

Tableno.2 shown that mean waist circumference was 96.69±7.34 cm.

 

Table3: Descriptive statistics of SBP,DBP, FBS Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides

Parameter

SBP

DBP

FBS

TC

HDL

TGL

Mean

137.93

88.31

155.16

190.18

43.81

197.55

Median

136

88

144

190

44

154

Mode

140

90

122

198

48

82

Std. Deviation

12.99

6.76

45.81

34.31

6.14

110.15

Minimum

116

78

101

132

32

77

Maximum

180

110

286

300

58

453

 

Table no.3 shown that the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 137.93 mmHg and 88.31 mmHg, respectively, indicating hypertension among the study participants. The mean fasting blood sugar was 155.16 mg/dL, suggesting poor glycaemic control. Mean total cholesterol was 190.18 mg/dL, while mean HDL cholesterol was 43.81 mg/dL, indicating dyslipidaemia. Triglyceride levels were elevated with a mean value of 197.55 mg/dL and wide variability, reflecting a high prevalence of hypertriglyceridaemia.

 

Table 4: Thyroid Function Status(N=85)

Thyroid function status

Frequency

Percentage

Euthyroid

69

81.2

Hypothyroidism

3

3.5

Sub clinical hyperthyroidism

1

1.2

Sub clinical hypothyroidism

12

14.1

Total

85

100.0

Tableno.4 shown that Among 85 study subjects, 69(81.2%) were Euthyroid, 12(14.1%) have sub clinical hypothyroidism, 3(3.5%) were suffering from hypothyroidism and 2(1.2%) had sub clinical hyper thyroidism. 16(18.8%) were having thyroid dysfunction in our study.

 

Table5: Metabolic syndrome parameters among study subjects

No. of metabolic syndrome parameters

Frequency

Percentage

2criteria

13

15.4

3criteria

42

49.4

4criteria

15

17.6

5criteria

15

17.6

Total

85

100.0

 

Table no. 5 shown that Among 85 study subjects, 25(29.4%) fulfilled all metabolic syndrome criteria, 25(29.4%) fulfilled 4 out  of 5metabolicsyndromecriteria, 32(37.6%) fulfilled3outof 5 metabolic syndrome criteria and 3(3.6%) fulfilled 2 criteria.

 

Table 6: Association between gender, age categories and thyroid function status

 

Category

 

Euthyroid

 

Hypothyroid

Sub clinical hyperthyroid

Sub clinical hypothyroid

 

p-value

 

Gender

Male

32(46.4%)

1(33.3%)

0

2(16.7%)

 

0.049*

Female

37(53.6%)

2(66.7%)

1(100%)

10(83.3%)

 

 

 

 

 

Age group

<40

Years

 

29(42%)

 

2(66.7%)

 

0

 

6(50%)

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

41-50

Years

 

26(37.7%)

 

1(33.3%)

 

1(100%)

 

2(16.7%)

51-60

years

 

9(13%)

 

0

 

0

 

4(33.3%)

>61

years

 

5(7.2%)

 

0

 

0

 

0

*Fischer’stest, p=0.049

 

Table no. 6 shown that Subclinical hypothyroidism was significantly more common in females 10(83.3%) than males (p=0.049). Subclinical hypothyroid patients were distributed across age groups(<40years:50%;41–50years:16.7%;51–60years:33.3%),but age was not significantly associated with thyroid dysfunction (p=0.5).

 

Table7:Association Between Thyroid Function and MetS Criteria

Metabolic syndrome criteria

 

Euthyroid

 

hypothyroid

 

Sub clinical hyperthyroid

 

Sub clinical hypothyroid

 

Pvalue

2criteria

13(18.8%)

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

0.002*

3criteria

38(55.1%)

1(33.333%)

0

3(25%)

4criteria

11(15.9%)

1(33.333%)

1(100%)

2(16.7%)

5criteria

7(10.2%)

1(33.333%)

0

7(58.3%)

*Fischer’stest, p=0.002

 

Table no.7 shown that all patients with subclinical hypothyroidism were having >3criteria in metabolicsyndrome.7(58.3%) of subjects with subclinical hypothyroidism were having 5 criteria of metabolic syndrome. This was statistically significant (P value-0.002). All the patients with hypothyroidism were having >3 criteria in metabolic syndrome

 

 

DISCUSSION

This study confirms a significant association between thyroid dysfunction, particularly subclinical hypothyroidism, and MetS, with a prevalence of 18.8% among 85 patients. This finding aligns with previous studies reporting thyroid dysfunction prevalence ranging from 16.7% to 54% in MetS patients. [19,20,22,26] Subclinical hypothyroidism was the most common thyroid abnormality (14.1%), consistent with reports by Abd-El-Hay et al. (21%) and Balakrishna et al. (25.3%). [25,27] The higher prevalence in females (83.3% of subclinical hypothyroid cases) corroborates studies by Rao et al. and Ginnaram et al., which noted a female predominance in thyroid dysfunction among MetS patients. [21,24] This may reflect sex-specific differences in thyroid autoimmunity or hormonal influences, although thyroid antibodies were not assessed in this study.

The significant association between subclinical hypothyroidism and the presence of three or more MetS criteria (p = 0.002) suggests that thyroid dysfunction exacerbates the cardiometabolic burden in MetS. This is supported by Jiaji He et al., who found increased waist circumference, triglycerides, and blood pressure in hypothyroid patients. [26] Thyroid hormones regulate lipid metabolism, and hypothyroidism reduces lipid degradation, leading to elevated triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, which are key components of MetS. [9,28] Furthermore, hypothyroidism impairs endothelial function and increases vascular resistance, contributing to hypertension, as noted by Taddei et al. [29] These mechanisms likely underlie the observed link between thyroid dysfunction and MetS severity.

The lack of significant correlations between T4/TSH and MetS parameters contrasts with the findings of Chakradhar et al., who reported associations with blood sugar and waist circumference. [19] This discrepancy may be attributed to the small sample size and high variability in our study, as well as the absence of data on confounding factors such as thyroid autoantibodies or adipokines (e.g., leptin, resistin). Hospital-based recruitment may have introduced selection bias, as patients with advanced MetS are more likely to seek tertiary care. Additionally, the cross-sectional design limits causal inferences, and the lack of ultrasound or iodine status assessments precludes a comprehensive evaluation of thyroid pathology.

Future studies should employ larger, population-based samples and include longitudinal follow-up to assess the progression of thyroid dysfunction and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes in MetS. Measuring thyroid autoantibodies, adipokines, and iodine status could provide deeper insights into the mechanisms linking thyroid dysfunction and MetS. Routine thyroid screening in MetS patients, particularly females, may facilitate early intervention to mitigate cardiovascular risk, as supported by Deshmukh et al. and Saluja et al. [20,23]

 

Limitations

The study was limited by a small sample size, which restricts generalizability, and its hospital-based design, which may introduce selection bias. Confounding factors such as thyroid autoantibodies, iodine status, and adipokines (e.g., leptin, resistin) were not assessed. Patients on levothyroxine could not be evaluated for prior thyroid status due to incomplete data.

 

Recommendations

Larger, multi-center studies with longitudinal follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and assess the progression of thyroid dysfunction in MetS. Including thyroid autoantibody testing and ultrasonography could clarify the etiology of thyroid dysfunction. Community-based studies in primary care settings would better represent India’s diverse population.

 

CONCLUSION

Thyroid dysfunction, particularly subclinical hypothyroidism, is prevalent among MetS patients in Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, and is associated with more severe MetS profiles, especially in females. Routine thyroid function testing in MetS patients could enable early intervention to reduce cardiovascular and metabolic risks. These findings advocate integrated screening and management strategies in India’s growing MetS population.

Funding: No funding sources.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Ormazabal V, Nair S, Elfeky O, Aguayo C, Salomon C, Zuñiga FA. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2018 Aug 31;17(1):122.
  2. Alshehri AM. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk. J Family Community Med. 2010;17(2):73–8.
  3. Krishnamoorthy Y, Rajaa S, Murali S, Rehman T, Sahoo J, Kar SS. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adult population in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240971
  4. Zimmet P, Magliano D, Matsuzawa Y, Alberti G, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome: a global public health problem and a new definition. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005;12(6):295–300.
  5. Iwen KA, Schröder E, Brabant G. Thyroid hormones and the metabolic syndrome. Eur Thyroid J. 2013 Jun;2(2):83–92.
  6. Gomberg-Maitland M, Frishman WH. Thyroid hormone and cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1998 Feb;135(2 Pt 1):187–96.
  7. Rizos CV, Elisaf MS, Liberopoulos EN. Effects of thyroid dysfunction on lipid profile. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2011 Feb 24;5:76–84.
  8. Wang X, Wang H, Yan L, Yang L, Xue Y, Yang J, et al. The positive association between subclinical hypothyroidism and newly diagnosed hypertension is more explicit in female individuals younger than 65. Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Aug 10;36(4):778–89.
  9. Sinha RA, Singh BK, Yen PM. Direct effects of thyroid hormones on hepatic lipid metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 May;14(5):259–69.
  10. Razvi S, Jabbar A, Pingitore A, Danzi S, Biondi B, Klein I, et al. Thyroid hormones and cardiovascular function and diseases. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018 Apr 24;71(16):1781–96.
  11. Fatourechi V. Subclinical hypothyroidism: An update for primary care physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Jan;84(1):65–71.
  12. Kota SK, Meher LK, Krishna S, Modi K. Hypothyroidism in metabolic syndrome. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Dec;16(Suppl 2):S332–3.
  13. Uzunlulu M, Yorulmaz E, Oguz A. Prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in patients with metabolic syndrome. Endocr J. 2007 Feb;54(1):71–6.
  14. Danzi S, Klein I. Thyroid hormone and blood pressure regulation. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2003 Dec;5(6):513–20.
  15. Colapietro N, Xodo C, Rovina M, Grillo A, Darin A, Giudici F, et al. The effect of thyroid hormone normalization on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypothyroid patients. Journal of Hypertension. 2021 Apr;39:e150.
  16. Alberti G, Magliano D, Matsuzawa Y, Alberti G, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome: a global public health problem and a new definition. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005;12(6):295–300.
  17. Gosi SKY, Garla VV. Subclinical hypothyroidism. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 15].
  18. Biondi B, Cooper DS. The clinical significance of subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Endocrine Reviews. 2008 Feb 1;29(1):76–131.
  19. Chakradhar M, Chakravarthy DJK, Dorapudi BSCH, et al. Thyroid dysfunction in metabolic syndrome patients in a tertiary care hospital. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(30):2103–2108.
  20. Saluja M, Pyarsabadi P, Jelia S, Chittora S, Swami Y, Vimlani H. Study of thyroid dysfunction in metabolic syndrome and association with its components. Current Medicine Research and Practice. 2018 Jan 1;8(1):3–7.
  21. Rao M, Malik N, Singla S, Kumar V. Prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in metabolic syndrome and correlation with its components. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2022 Apr 12;13(2):31–5.
  22. Deshmukh V, Farishta F, Bhole M. Thyroid dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional, epidemiological, pan-India study. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2018 Dec 25;2018:e2930251.
  23. Ginnaram SR, D Sridevi, Dambal AA, Reddy SY, Pingle AR. Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research. 2021 Mar 15;7(3):374–9.
  24. El-Hay GAESA, Argoon SA, Mousa NMMA. Evaluation of the frequency and patterns of thyroid dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome. The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine. 2021 Aug 2;33(1):24.
  25. He J, Lai Y, Yang J, Yao Y, Li Y, Teng W, et al. The relationship between thyroid function and metabolic syndrome and its components: A cross-sectional study in a Chinese population. Frontiers in Endocrinology [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 7].
  26. Nitturkar DRK. Co-relation between metabolic syndrome and hypothyroidism, patients attaining general medicine OPD. International Journal of Medical Science and Diagnosis Research [Internet]. 2019 Feb 27 [cited 2022 Aug 7];3(2). Available from: https://www.ijmsdr.com/index.php/ijmsdr/article/view/287
  27. Barla Krishna, Priya K. Dhas, Bettina J, N. Rama Krishna. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and the pattern of thyroid dysfunction among North Coastal Andhra population. Thyroid Disorders Ther. Nov 2021;10:264. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 7].
  28. Rizos CV, Elisaf MS, Liberopoulos EN. Effects of thyroid dysfunction on lipid profile. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2011 Feb 24;5:76–84.
  29. Taddei S, Caraccio N, Virdis A, Dardano A, Versari D, Ghiadoni L, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in subclinical hypothyroidism: beneficial effect of levothyroxine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Aug;88(8):3731–7.
  30. Navin B, K. E. Arumugam. A study of thyroid dysfunction in metabolic syndrome patients in Chengalpattu District. IAIM. 2020;7(3):41–46. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 7].
  31. Watt K, Charlton M. Metabolic syndrome and liver transplantation: A review and guide to management. Journal of Hepatology. 2010 Jul 1;53:199–206. 
Recommended Articles
Research Article Open Access
Comparative Analgesic Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl versus Intrathecal Midazolam as Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Caesarean Section: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2477-2484
Research Article Open Access
Prevalence of Rifampicin resistance detected by TrueNat assay in suspected pulmonary cases in a teritiary care hospital, Kurnool
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2492-2496
Research Article Open Access
Study of prevalence of haemoglobin subtypes/variants in the ethnic population of Manipur
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2497-2500
Research Article Open Access
Cancer Pattern at a Tertiary Care hospital in Pir Panjal (Rajouri & Poonch) region of Jammu and Kashmir
2026, Volume-7, Issue 1 : 2485-2491
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research journal thumbnail
Volume-7, Issue 1
Citations
30 Views
34 Downloads
Share this article
License
Copyright (c) International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJMPR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Logo
International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
About Us
The International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (IJMPR) is an EMBASE (Elsevier)–indexed, open-access journal for high-quality medical, pharmaceutical, and clinical research.
Follow Us
facebook twitter linkedin mendeley research-gate
© Copyright | International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Research | All Rights Reserved