Background: Liver lesions are often found incidentally, and accurate imaging is decisive for determining their nature and guiding treatment. This read aims to compare the characteristic truths of attractive ringing imagery (MRI) and calculated imaging (CT) in inch-big patients presenting with liver lesions, focusing on differentiating kinds from malevolent lesions.Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 120 adult patients (60 males and 60 females) with a mean age of 45 years (range: 25-75 years). Apiece diligent underwent both magnetic resonance imaging and cat imagery. The diagnostic precision sensitivity specificity positive foretelling value (PPV) and negative foretelling value (NPV) of both imaging modalities were calculated and compared.Results: MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 84%-97%). specificity of 88% (95% CI: 79%-93%), PPV of 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), and NPV of 91% (95% CI: 83%-96%). Cat imagery showed amp sensibility of 85% (95% CI: 77%-92%). specificity of 80% (95% CI: 71%-88%), ppv of 86% (95% CI: 78%-92%), and npv of 79% (95% CI: 70%-87%). The overall diagnostic The precision of MRI was 90% compared to CT's 82%. Magnetic resonance imaging is incontestable, and importantly, higher sensibility (p0.05).Conclusion: MRI provides superior diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for characterizing liver lesions in adults, making it a preferred imaging modality. However, CT remains a valuable tool for initial assessment due to its broader availability and faster imaging time.